Literature DB >> 23205915

The effects of the previous outcome on probabilistic choice in rats.

Andrew T Marshall1, Kimberly Kirkpatrick.   

Abstract

This study examined the effects of previous outcomes on subsequent choices in a probabilistic-choice task. Twenty-four rats were trained to choose between a certain outcome (1 or 3 pellets) versus an uncertain outcome (3 or 9 pellets), delivered with a probability of .1, .33, .67, and .9 in different phases. Uncertain outcome choices increased with the probability of uncertain food. Additionally, uncertain choices increased with the probability of uncertain food following both certain-choice outcomes and unrewarded uncertain choices. However, following uncertain-choice food outcomes, there was a tendency to choose the uncertain outcome in all cases, indicating that the rats continued to "gamble" after successful uncertain choices, regardless of the overall probability or magnitude of food. A subsequent manipulation, in which the probability of uncertain food varied within each session as a function of the previous uncertain outcome, examined how the previous outcome and probability of uncertain food affected choice in a dynamic environment. Uncertain-choice behavior increased with the probability of uncertain food. The rats exhibited increased sensitivity to probability changes and a greater degree of win-stay/lose-shift behavior than in the static phase. Simulations of two sequential choice models were performed to explore the possible mechanisms of reward value computations. The simulation results supported an exponentially decaying value function that updated as a function of trial (rather than time). These results emphasize the importance of analyzing global and local factors in choice behavior and suggest avenues for the future development of sequential-choice models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23205915      PMCID: PMC3906648          DOI: 10.1037/a0030765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  36 in total

1.  Effects of lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex on sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic reinforcement.

Authors:  S Mobini; S Body; M-Y Ho; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi; J F W Deakin; I M Anderson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2002-01-25       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Gambling rats: insight into impulsive and addictive behavior.

Authors:  Catharine A Winstanley
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Risk-sensitive neurons in macaque posterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  Allison N McCoy; Michael L Platt
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-08-14       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Dynamic response-by-response models of matching behavior in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Brian Lau; Paul W Glimcher
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  A modular theory of learning and performance.

Authors:  Paulo Guilhardi; Linun Yi; Russell M Church
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

7.  Dynamic averaging and foraging decisions in horses (Equus callabus).

Authors:  Jill A Devenport; Megan R Patterson; Lynn D Devenport
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Preferences for fixed and variable food sources: variability in amount and delay.

Authors:  M Bateson; A Kacelnik
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The integration of reinforcements over time.

Authors:  S E Lea; S M Dow
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Balancing variable patch quality with predation risk.

Authors:  Michael F Winterrowd; Lynn D Devenport
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2004-07-30       Impact factor: 1.777

View more
  11 in total

1.  Individual differences in impulsive and risky choice: effects of environmental rearing conditions.

Authors:  Kimberly Kirkpatrick; Andrew T Marshall; Aaron P Smith; Juraj Koci; Yoonseong Park
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Resurrecting the individual in behavioral analysis: Using mixed effects models to address nonsystematic discounting data.

Authors:  Kimberly Kirkpatrick; Andrew T Marshall; Catherine C Steele; Jennifer R Peterson
Journal:  Behav Anal (Wash D C)       Date:  2018-06-18

3.  Reinforcement learning models of risky choice and the promotion of risk-taking by losses disguised as wins in rats.

Authors:  Andrew T Marshall; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.478

4.  Modeling risky decision-making in nonhuman animals: shared core features.

Authors:  Sarah R Heilbronner
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2017-08

5.  Effects of SKF-83566 and haloperidol on performance on progressive ratio schedules maintained by sucrose and corn oil reinforcement: quantitative analysis using a new model derived from the Mathematical Principles of Reinforcement (MPR).

Authors:  C M Olarte-Sánchez; L Valencia-Torres; H J Cassaday; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Mechanisms of Individual Differences in Impulsive and Risky Choice in Rats.

Authors:  Kimberly Kirkpatrick; Andrew T Marshall; Aaron P Smith
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2015

7.  Fractionating choice: A study on reward discrimination, preference, and relative valuation in the rat (Rattus norvegicus).

Authors:  Joshua M Ricker; Justin D Hatch; Daniel D Powers; Howard Casey Cromwell
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Budget Constraints Affect Male Rats' Choices between Differently Priced Commodities.

Authors:  Marijn van Wingerden; Christine Marx; Tobias Kalenscher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Relative gains, losses, and reference points in probabilistic choice in rats.

Authors:  Andrew T Marshall; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Probability Distortion Depends on Choice Sequence in Rhesus Monkeys.

Authors:  Simone Ferrari-Toniolo; Philipe M Bujold; Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.