Literature DB >> 16131264

Dynamic averaging and foraging decisions in horses (Equus callabus).

Jill A Devenport1, Megan R Patterson, Lynn D Devenport.   

Abstract

The variability of most environments taxes foraging decisions by increasing the uncertainty of the information available. One solution to the problem is to use dynamic averaging, as do some granivores and carnivores. Arguably, the same strategy could be useful for grazing herbivores, even though their food renews and is more homogeneously distributed. Horses (Equus callabus) were given choices between variable patches after short or long delays. When patch information was current, horses returned to the patch that was recently best, whereas those without current information matched choices to the long-term average values of the patches. These results demonstrate that a grazing species uses dynamic averaging and indicate that, like granivores and carnivores, they can use temporal weighting to optimize foraging decisions. Copyright 2005 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16131264     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.119.3.352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  6 in total

1.  Behavioral momentum and accumulation of mass in multiple schedules.

Authors:  Andrew R Craig; Paul J Cunningham; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Extinction from a rationalist perspective.

Authors:  C R Gallistel
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Sampling and tracking a changing environment: persistence and reward in the foraging decisions of bumblebees.

Authors:  Aimee S Dunlap; Daniel R Papaj; Anna Dornhaus
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Tracking a changing environment: optimal sampling, adaptive memory and overnight effects.

Authors:  Aimee S Dunlap; David W Stephens
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  The effects of the previous outcome on probabilistic choice in rats.

Authors:  Andrew T Marshall; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2012-12-03

6.  Horses wait for more and better rewards in a delay of gratification paradigm.

Authors:  Désirée Brucks; Anna Härterich; Uta König von Borstel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.