Literature DB >> 6538386

Hazards and benefits of elective induction of labor.

L P Smith, B A Nagourney, F H McLean, R H Usher.   

Abstract

Labor, delivery, and newborn course were studied in 621 pregnancies in which labor was electively induced at or after 39 weeks, and in 3,851 control pregnancies in which the onset of labor was spontaneous. Induced labors were not prolonged, nor was the duration of ruptured membranes. Fetal distress and birth asphyxia were not more frequent after induction, and release of meconium occurred much less frequently (9.3% for induced labor versus 16.7% for spontaneous). There was greater use of epidural analgesia and of forceps delivery in induced labor. Among primiparous patients, cesarean delivery for "failure to progress" was performed in 14% of electively induced labors and 7% of spontaneous control labors, a difference not noted among multiparous patients who had a primary cesarean birth rate of less than 2%. Iatrogenic prematurity was not a problem; none of the 621 infants who was born after elective induction developed respiratory distress syndrome, and only one weighed less than 2,500 gm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6538386     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(84)90752-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  3 in total

1.  Is elective induction safe? A prospective analysis.

Authors:  Vidya Ramasamy; Suchitra Thunga; S R Nayak
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2012-02-14

2.  Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management among Obese Women at ≥39 Weeks.

Authors:  Anna Palatnik; Michelle A Kominiarek
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Risk factors for cesarean delivery following labor induction in multiparous women.

Authors:  Corine J Verhoeven; Cedric T van Uytrecht; Martina M Porath; Ben Willem J Mol
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2013-01-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.