Literature DB >> 23811737

Two-phase strategy of neural control for planar reaching movements: II--relation to spatiotemporal characteristics of movement trajectory.

Miya K Rand1, Yury P Shimansky.   

Abstract

In the companion paper utilizing a quantitative model of optimal motor coordination (Part I, Rand and Shimansky, in Exp Brain Res 225:55-73, 2013), we examined coordination between X and Y movement directions (XYC) during reaching movements performed under three prescribed speeds, two movement amplitudes, and two target sizes. The obtained results indicated that the central nervous system (CNS) utilizes a two-phase strategy, where the initial and the final phases correspond to lower and higher precision of information processing, respectively, for controlling goal-directed reach-type movements to optimize the total cost of task performance including the cost of neural computations. The present study investigates how two different well-known concepts used for describing movement performance relate to the concepts of optimal XYC and two-phase control strategy. First, it is examined to what extent XYC is equivalent to movement trajectory straightness. The data analysis results show that the variability, the movement trajectory's deviation from the straight line, increases with an increase in prescribed movement speed. In contrast, the dependence of XYC strength on movement speed is opposite (in total agreement with an assumption of task performance optimality), suggesting that XYC is a feature of much higher level of generality than trajectory straightness. Second, it is tested how well the ballistic and the corrective components described in the traditional concept of two-component model of movement performance match with the initial and the final phase of the two-phase control strategy, respectively. In fast reaching movements, the percentage of trials with secondary corrective submovement was smaller under larger-target shorter-distance conditions. In slower reaching movements, meaningful parsing was impossible due to massive fluctuations in the kinematic profile throughout the movement. Thus, the parsing points determined by the conventional submovement analysis did not consistently reflect separation between the ballistic and error-corrective components. In contrast to the traditional concept of two-component movement performance, the concept of two-phase control strategy is applicable to a wide variety of experimental conditions.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23811737     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3626-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

1.  Effects of accuracy constraints on reach-to-grasp movements in cerebellar patients.

Authors:  M K Rand; Y Shimansky; G E Stelmach; V Bracha; J R Bloedel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Role of cocontraction in arm movement accuracy.

Authors:  Paul L Gribble; Lucy I Mullin; Nicholas Cothros; Andrew Mattar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Optimality principles in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Determining movement onsets from temporal series.

Authors:  N Teasdale; C Bard; M Fleury; D E Young; L Proteau
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Control of aperture closure during reach-to-grasp movements in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  M K Rand; A L Smiley-Oyen; Y P Shimansky; J R Bloedel; G E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Limb stiffness is modulated with spatial accuracy requirements during movement in the absence of destabilizing forces.

Authors:  Jeremy Wong; Elizabeth T Wilson; Nicole Malfait; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Origins of submovements during pointing movements.

Authors:  Laetitia Fradet; Gyusung Lee; Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2008-06-11

8.  Two-phase strategy of controlling motor coordination determined by task performance optimality.

Authors:  Yury P Shimansky; Miya K Rand
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Movement accuracy constraints in Parkinson's disease patients.

Authors:  M K Rand; G E Stelmach; J R Bloedel
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  3 in total

1.  Delay of gaze fixation during reaching movement with the non-dominant hand to a distant target.

Authors:  Miya K Rand; Shannon D R Ringenbach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Eye-hand coordination during visuomotor adaptation with different rotation angles.

Authors:  Sebastian Rentsch; Miya K Rand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Characterizing and predicting submovements during human three-dimensional arm reaches.

Authors:  James Y Liao; Robert F Kirsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.