| Literature DB >> 23203065 |
Chunhui Ma1, Lei Yang, Fengjian Yang, Wenjie Wang, Chunjian Zhao, Yuangang Zu.
Abstract
In this work, a multivariate study based on Box-Behnken Design was used to evaluate the influence of three major variables affecting the performance of the extraction process of Schisandra chinensis anthocyanins. The optimum parameters were 5.5 h extraction time; 1:19 solid-liquid ratio and 260 r/min stirring rate, respectively. The extraction yield of anthocyanins was 29.06 mg/g under the optimum conditions. Moreover, many factors on the impact of heating, ultrasound, microwave treatment and ultraviolet irradiation on content and color stability of anthocyanins from Schisandra chinensis fruit were investigated. The results show that thermal degradation reaction of anthocyanins complies with the first order reaction kinetics, and the correlation coefficient is greater than 0.9950 at 40-80°C. Ultrasound and microwave treatment has little effect on the stability of anthocyanins, and the extraction time of ultrasound and microwave should be no more than 60 min and 5 min, respectively. The anthocyanins degradation effect of UVC ultraviolet radiation is greater than UVA and UVB; after 9 h ultraviolet radiation, the anthocyanins content degradation of UVC is 23.9 ± 0.7%, and the ∆E* was changed from 62.81 to 76.52 ± 2.3. Through LC-MS analysis, the major composition of Schisandra chinensis anthocyanins was cyanidin-3-O-xylosylrutinoside.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23203065 PMCID: PMC3509581 DOI: 10.3390/ijms131114294
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Spectral character of S. chinensis fruit anthocyanin at different pH values.
Experimental design matrix to screen important variables for extraction yield of anthocyanins.
| Run | Factor A | Factor B | Factor C | Response |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Extraction time (h) | Solid-liquid ratio (g/mL) | Stirring rate (r/min) | Extraction yield (mg/g) | |
| 1 | 3.0 | 1:20 | 240 | 26.43 |
| 2 | 3.0 | 1:15 | 180 | 23.86 |
| 3 | 3.0 | 1:10 | 240 | 20.37 |
| 4 | 5.0 | 1:20 | 300 | 29.13 |
| 5 | 5.0 | 1:15 | 240 | 28.61 |
| 6 | 7.0 | 1:10 | 240 | 28.33 |
| 7 | 7.0 | 1:15 | 300 | 28.92 |
| 8 | 7.0 | 1:20 | 240 | 29.30 |
| 9 | 5.0 | 1:15 | 240 | 28.60 |
| 10 | 5.0 | 1:10 | 300 | 27.97 |
| 11 | 5.0 | 1:20 | 180 | 28.84 |
| 12 | 5.0 | 1:10 | 180 | 25.66 |
| 13 | 5.0 | 1:15 | 240 | 28.60 |
| 14 | 5.0 | 1:15 | 240 | 28.67 |
| 15 | 5.0 | 1:15 | 240 | 28.65 |
| 16 | 3.0 | 1:15 | 300 | 24.25 |
| 17 | 7.0 | 1:15 | 180 | 28.77 |
Test of significance for regression coefficient a.
| Source | Sum of squares | Df | Mean square | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 95.74 | 9 | 10.64 | 45.56 | <0.0001 |
| A | 52.07 | 1 | 52.07 | 223.02 | <0.0001 |
| B | 16.16 | 1 | 16.16 | 69.21 | <0.0001 |
| C | 1.23 | 1 | 1.23 | 5.28 | 0.0552 |
| AB | 6.48 | 1 | 6.48 | 27.74 | 0.0012 |
| AC | 0.014 | 1 | 0.014 | 0.062 | 0.8110 |
| BC | 1.02 | 1 | 1.02 | 4.37 | 0.0749 |
| A2 | 16.58 | 1 | 16.58 | 71.00 | <0.0001 |
| B2 | 1.20 | 1 | 1.02 | 5.15 | 0.0576 |
| C2 | 0.15 | 1 | 0.15 | 0.66 | 0.4423 |
| Linear | 27.91 | 9 | 3.10 | 3010.56 | <0.0001 |
| 2FI | 20.40 | 6 | 3.40 | 3300.38 | <0.0001 |
| Quadratic | 1.63 | 3 | 0.54 | 527.60 | <0.0001 |
| Cubic | 0.00 | 0 | - | - | - |
| Residual | 1.63 | 7 | 0.23 | - | - |
| Lack of fit | 1.63 | 3 | 0.54 | 527.60 | <0.0001 |
| Pure Error | 4.12 × 10−3 | 4 | 1.03 × 10−3 | - | - |
| Cor Total | 97.38 | 16 | - | - | - |
The results were obtained with the Design Expert 7.0 software;
A is extraction time (h), B is solid-liquid ratio (g/mL) and C is stirring rate (r/min).
Credibility analysis of the regression equations.
| Index mark | Values |
|---|---|
| Std. Dev. | 0.48 |
| Mean | 27.35 |
| C.V. % | 1.77 |
| PRESS | 26.09 |
| R-Squared | 0.9832 |
| Adjust R-Squared | 0.9616 |
| Predicted R-Squared | 0.7321 |
| Adequacy Precision | 23.128 |
The results were obtained with the Design Expert 7.0 software.
Figure 2Response surface for the effect of independent variables on extraction yield of S. chinensis fruit anthocyanin.
Figure 3Effect of heating on content (a) and color (b) stability of S. chinensis fruit anthocyanins.
Thermal degradation kinetic parameters of S. chinensis anthocyanin.
| Temperature (°C) | First-order kinetic equation | Kinetic constant ( | Correlation coefficient ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40 | 0.0057 | 0.9988 | |
| 50 | 0.0148 | 0.9982 | |
| 60 | 0.0248 | 0.9989 | |
| 70 | 0.0298 | 0.9969 | |
| 80 | 0.0604 | 0.9974 |
Effect of extraction time on content and color stability of S. chinensis anthocyanins.
| Treat time of ultrasonication (min) | C/C0 | Δ |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1.000 | 62.81 |
| 10 | 98.0 ± 0.7 | 65.17 ± 2.5 |
| 20 | 97.0 ± 0.7 | 65.82 ± 2.6 |
| 30 | 96.0 ± 0.5 | 66.35 ± 1.7 |
| 40 | 96.0 ± 0.4 | 66.45 ± 2.5 |
| 50 | 96.0 ± 0.7 | 66.54 ± 2.4 |
| 60 | 95.0 ± 0.6 | 66.95 ± 1.7 |
| 70 | 94.0 ± 0.6 | 67.38 ± 2.4 |
| 80 | 94.0 ± 0.6 | 67.86 ± 2.6 |
| 90 | 93.0 ± 0.4 | 67.88 ± 2.7 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| 0 | 1.000 | 62.81 |
| 5 | 95.0 ± 0.6 | 67.79 ± 2.6 |
| 10 | 94.0 ± 0.7 | 67.92 ± 2.4 |
| 15 | 93.0 ± 0.8 | 68.57 ± 2.7 |
| 20 | 93.0 ± 0.4 | 68.90 ± 2.7 |
| 25 | 92.0 ± 0.4 | 69.07 ± 2.4 |
| 30 | 91.0 ± 0.5 | 69.26 ± 2.4 |
| 35 | 91.0 ± 0.6 | 69.86 ± 1.7 |
| 40 | 90.0 ± 0.7 | 70.49 ± 1.5 |
| 45 | 90.0 ± 0.8 | 70.65 ± 2.5 |
C/C0: the ratio of degradation concentration and initial concentration;
SD: standard deviation;
ΔE*: total color difference.
Figure 4Effect of ultraviolet irradiation on content (a) and color (b) stability of S. chinensis fruit anthocyanins.
Figure 5HPLC-MS Chromatograms of Cyanidin-3-O-xylosylrutinoside. (a) MS1 chromatograms of cyanidin-3-O-xylosylrutinoside under ESI-MS in positive mode; (b) MS2 chromatograms of cyanidin-3-O-xylosylrutinoside under ESI-MS in positive mode; (c) MS1 chromatograms of cyanidin-3-O-xylosylrutinoside under ESI-MS in negative mode; (d) MS2 chromatograms of cyanidin-3-O-xylosylrutinoside under ESI-MS in negative mode.