| Literature DB >> 23202962 |
Barbara M van Amerongen1, François Feron.
Abstract
Mounting evidence correlate vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) supplementation or higher serum levels of vitamin D (25(OH)D) with a lower risk of developing multiple sclerosis (MS), reduced relapse rate, slower progression or fewer new brain lesions. We present here the case of a woman who was diagnosed with MS in 1990. From 1980 to 2000, her ability to walk decreased from ~20 to 1 km per day. Since January 2001, a vitamin D3 supplement was ingested daily. The starting dose was 20 mcg (800 IU)/day and escalated to 100 mcg (4000 IU)/day in September 2004 and then to 150 mcg (6000 IU)/day in December 2005. Vitamin D3 intake reduced muscular pain and improved ambulation from 1 (February 2000) to 14 km/day (February 2008). Vitamin D intake over 10 years caused no adverse effects: no hypercalcaemia, nephrolithiasis or hypercalciuria were observed. Bowel problems in MS may need to be addressed as they can cause malabsorption including calcium, which may increase serum PTH and 1,25(OH)2D levels, as well as bone loss. We suggest that periodic assessment of vitamin D3, calcium and magnesium intake, bowel problems and the measurement of serum 25(OH)D, PTH, Ca levels, UCa/Cr and bone health become part of the integral management of persons with MS.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23202962 PMCID: PMC3497336 DOI: 10.3390/ijms131013461
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Biochemical assessment (n = 1).
| Date | 5 December 2001 | 4 October 2004 | 29 September 2005 | 24 March 2006 | 5 October 2006 | 17 October 2007 | 28 January 2009 | 28 July 2009 | 23 June 2010 | 7 June 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||||
| Hospital | a | b | b | b | b | b | c | b | b | d | ||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Blood test | Unit | NR | ||||||||||
| 25(OH)D | nmol/L | >50 | 102 | 84 | 102 | 84 | 138 | 142 | 145 | 201 | 204 | 135 |
| 1,25(OH)2D | pmol/L | 50–180 | 147 | 164 | 172 | 119 | nd | 55 | ||||
| PTH | pmol/L | 7.9 | 4.1 | 4.5 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 4.3 | 5.4 | 3.7 | 6.3 | 3.2 | |
| PTH | %URL | < 30 | 72 | 75 | 82 | 66 | 64 | 63 | 79 | 54 | 93 | 72 |
| Calcium | mmol/L | 2.2–2.6 | 2.25 | 2.34 | 2.34 | 2.29 | 2.32 | 2.38 | 2.37 | 2.42 | 2.32 | 2.34 |
| Magnesium | mmol/L | 0.7–1.0 | nd | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0,8 | nd | nd | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Phosphate | mmol/L | 0.7–1.4 | 0.87 | 1.20 | 1.10 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.30 | nd | 1.20 | 1.17 |
| Creatinine | mmol/L | 60–110 | 85 | 75 | 74 | 64 | 70 | 76 | 70 | nd | 73 | 67 |
| Albumin | g/L | 35–50 | nd | 40 | 41 | 39 | 40 | 38 | 42 | nd | 39 | 44 |
| ALP | IU/L | 40–120 | 65 | 79 | 74 | 79 | 80 | 63 | nd | nd | 73 | 47 |
a: VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; b: BovenIJ Hospital, Amsterdam; c: Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; d: Onze Lieve VrouwenGasthuis, Amsterdam; ALP: Alkaline Phosphatase; NR: normal rang [13]; PTH was analysed by different assay methods. For this reason the NR of PTH is not provided. The PTH values are expressed as a percentage of the corresponding upper reference limit (%URL) provided by the hospitals; 1,25(OH)2D values out of the NR are in bold font; nd: no data.
Figure 1Dose escalation of vitamin D3 (mcg/day) and calcium (cg/day) supplementation, serum levels of 25(OH)D in nmol/L (endpoint 25(OH)D level > 85 nmol/L), PTH in % upper reference limit (URL) (endpoint PTH level < 30 %URL) and 1,25(OH)2D in pmol/L (NR 1,25(OH)2D 50–180 pmol/L). (a) Vitamin D3 supplementation (mcg/day), serum levels of 25(OH)D in nmol/L, serum levels of PTH in %URL and serum levels of 1,25(OH)2D in pmol/L; (b) Calcium supplementation (cg/day), serum levels of 25(OH)D in nmol/L, serum levels of PTH in %URL and serum levels of 1,25(OH)2D in pmol/L.
Figure 2Ambulation, walking distance expressed in km/day and vitamin D3 supplementation (mcg/day).
Bone Mineral Index and Bone Mineral Density for Lumbar Spine and Left Proximal Femur.
| Date | Supplementation | Hospital | BMI | Location | BMD g/cm2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VD3 mcg/day | Ca mg/day | Mg mg/day | |||||||
| 1 January 1980 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 22 November 1999 | 0 | 0 | - | a | 21.6 | LS | 0.990 | -0.5 | nd |
| 9 January 2001 | 20 | 240/1day | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 4 September 2004 | 100 | 240/1day | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 21 December 2005 | 150 | 240/1day | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 28 January 2009 | 150 | 240/1day | - | b | 22.8 | LS | 0.873 | −1.6 | −0.2 |
| 10 March 2009 | 150 | 333/4day | 133/4day | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 27 July 2009 | 150 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 22 June 2010 | 150 | 0 | - | c | 20.8 | LS L2 t/m 4 | 0.962 | −2.0 | −0.7 |
| 16 May 2011 | 150 | 0 | - | c | 20.5 | LS L2 t/m 4 | 0.966 | −2.0 | −0.6 |
| 5 July 2011 | 150 | 145/4day | 237/4day | - | - | - | - | - | - |
a: VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam; b: Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; c: Onze Lieve VrouwenGasthuis, Amsterdam; LS: Lumbar Spine; LPF: Left Proximal Femur.