Literature DB >> 23199959

Modeling preventative strategies against human papillomavirus-related disease in developed countries.

Karen Canfell1, Harrell Chesson, Shalini L Kulasingam, Johannes Berkhof, Mireia Diaz, Jane J Kim.   

Abstract

Over the last 5 years, prophylactic vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) in pre-adolescent females has been introduced in most developed countries, supported by modeled evaluations that have almost universally found vaccination of pre-adolescent females to be cost-effective. Studies to date suggest that vaccination of pre-adolescent males may also be cost-effective at a cost per vaccinated individual of ~US$400-500 if vaccination coverage in females cannot be increased above ~50%; but if it is possible, increasing coverage in females appears to be a better return on investment. Comparative evaluation of the quadrivalent (HPV16,18,6,11) and bivalent (HPV16,18) vaccines centers around the potential trade-off between protection against anogenital warts and vaccine-specific levels of cross-protection against infections not targeted by the vaccines. Future evaluations will also need to consider the cost-effectiveness of a next generation nonavalent vaccine designed to protect against ~90% of cervical cancers. The timing of the effect of vaccination on cervical screening programs will be country-specific and will depend on vaccination catch-up age range and coverage and the age at which screening starts. Initial evaluations suggest that if screening remains unchanged, it will be less cost-effective in vaccinated compared to unvaccinated women but, in the context of current vaccines, will remain an important prevention method. Comprehensive evaluation of new approaches to screening will need to consider the population-level effects of vaccination over time. New screening strategies of particular interest include delaying the start age of screening, increasing the screening interval and switching to primary HPV screening. Future evaluations of screening will also need to focus on the effects of disparities in screening and vaccination uptake, the potential effects of vaccination on screening participation, and the effects of imperfect compliance with screening recommendations. This article forms part of a special supplement entitled "Comprehensive Control of HPV Infections and Related Diseases" Vaccine Volume 30, Supplement 5, 2012.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23199959      PMCID: PMC3783354          DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  81 in total

1.  UK will use Gardasil in its HPV vaccination programme from next September.

Authors:  Zosia Kmietowicz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-11-25

2.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of human papillomavirus-vaccination programs to prevent cervical cancer in Austria.

Authors:  Ingrid Zechmeister; Birgitte Freiesleben de Blasio; Geoff Garnett; Aileen Rae Neilson; Uwe Siebert
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Population effectiveness, not efficacy, should decide who gets vaccinated against human papillomavirus via publicly funded programs.

Authors:  Philip E Castle; Fang-Hui Zhao
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  The health and economic effects of HPV DNA screening in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Johannes Berkhof; Veerle M Coupé; Johannes A Bogaards; Folkert J van Kemenade; Theo J Helmerhorst; Peter J Snijders; Chris J Meijer
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Cost-consequences evaluation between bivalent and quadrivalent HPV vaccines in Italy: the potential impact of different cross-protection profiles.

Authors:  S Capri; R Gasparini; D Panatto; N Demarteau
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccination and screening in Spain.

Authors:  Mireia Diaz; Silvia de Sanjose; Jesse Ortendahl; Meredith O'Shea; Sue J Goldie; F Xavier Bosch; Jane J Kim
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  The potential cost-effectiveness of prophylactic human papillomavirus vaccines in Canada.

Authors:  Marc Brisson; Nicolas Van de Velde; Philippe De Wals; Marie-Claude Boily
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  The epidemiological and economic impact of a quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine (6/11/16/18) in the UK.

Authors:  E J Dasbach; R P Insinga; E H Elbasha
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccination in Belgium: do not forget about cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Nancy Thiry; Chris De Laet; Frank Hulstaert; Mattias Neyt; Michel Huybrechts; Irina Cleemput
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 10.  Global burden of cancers attributable to infections in 2008: a review and synthetic analysis.

Authors:  Catherine de Martel; Jacques Ferlay; Silvia Franceschi; Jérôme Vignat; Freddie Bray; David Forman; Martyn Plummer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 41.316

View more
  31 in total

Review 1.  Present challenges in cervical cancer prevention: Answers from cost-effectiveness analyses.

Authors:  Mireia Diaz; Silvia de Sanjosé; F Xavier Bosch; Laia Bruni
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-04-26

2.  Association between human papillomavirus and chlamydia trachomatis infection risk in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giulia Naldini; Chiara Grisci; Manuela Chiavarini; Roberto Fabiani
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 3.380

Review 3.  Extending the Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Programme to Include Males in High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of the Cost-Effectiveness Studies.

Authors:  Mohamed-Béchir Ben Hadj Yahia; Anaïs Jouin-Bortolotti; Benoît Dervaux
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.859

4.  Impact and Cost-effectiveness of 3 Doses of 9-Valent Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine Among US Females Previously Vaccinated With 4-Valent HPV Vaccine.

Authors:  Harrell W Chesson; Jean-François Laprise; Marc Brisson; Lauri E Markowitz
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 5.  Should human papillomavirus vaccination target women over age 26, heterosexual men and men who have sex with men? A targeted literature review of cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Nyi Nyi Soe; Jason J Ong; Xiaomeng Ma; Christopher K Fairley; Phyu Mon Latt; Jun Jing; Feng Cheng; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Human papillomavirus in high-grade cervical lesions: Austrian data of a European multicentre study.

Authors:  Lucia Rössler; Olaf Reich; Reinhard Horvat; Sabrina Collas de Souza; Katsyarina Holl; Elmar A Joura
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 1.704

7.  Evaluation of the immunogenicity of the quadrivalent HPV vaccine using 2 versus 3 doses at month 21: An epidemiological surveillance mechanism for alternate vaccination schemes.

Authors:  Mauricio Hernández-Ávila; Leticia Torres-Ibarra; Margaret Stanley; Jorge Salmerón; Aurelio Cruz-Valdez; Nubia Muñoz; Rolando Herrero; Ignacio F Villaseñor-Ruíz; Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Too late to vaccinate? The incremental benefits and cost-effectiveness of a delayed catch-up program using the 4-valent human papillomavirus vaccine in Norway.

Authors:  Emily A Burger; Stephen Sy; Mari Nygård; Ivar S Kristiansen; Jane J Kim
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Cost-effectiveness of 2-dose human papillomavirus vaccination for 12-year-old girls in Zhejiang Province: implications for China's expanded program on immunization.

Authors:  Yan Luo; Hanqing He; Xuewen Tang; Shenyu Wang; Jun Zhang; Ting Wu; Zhiping Chen
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Comprehensive control of human papillomavirus infections and related diseases.

Authors:  F Xavier Bosch; Thomas R Broker; David Forman; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Maura L Gillison; John Doorbar; Peter L Stern; Margaret Stanley; Marc Arbyn; Mario Poljak; Jack Cuzick; Philip E Castle; John T Schiller; Lauri E Markowitz; William A Fisher; Karen Canfell; Lynette A Denny; Eduardo L Franco; Marc Steben; Mark A Kane; Mark Schiffman; Chris J L M Meijer; Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan; Xavier Castellsagué; Jane J Kim; Maria Brotons; Laia Alemany; Ginesa Albero; Mireia Diaz; Silvia de Sanjosé
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.641

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.