Literature DB >> 20112339

The health and economic effects of HPV DNA screening in The Netherlands.

Johannes Berkhof1, Veerle M Coupé, Johannes A Bogaards, Folkert J van Kemenade, Theo J Helmerhorst, Peter J Snijders, Chris J Meijer.   

Abstract

We studied the health and economic effects of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing in cervical screening using a simulation model. The key data source was a Dutch longitudinal screening trial. We compared cytological testing with repeat cytology (for borderline/mildly abnormal smears) to HPV testing with cytology triage (for HPV-positive smears), combination testing (combined HPV and cytology) and cytological testing with HPV triage (for borderline/mildly abnormal smears). We varied the screening interval from 5 to 10 years. The main outcome measures were the number of cervical cancer cases, the number of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The base-case estimates were accompanied with ranges across 118 calibrated parameter settings (calibration criteria: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3, cancer and mortality rates). In comparison to 5-yearly cytology, 5-yearly HPV testing with cytology triage gave a reduction in the number of cancer cases of 23% (range, 9-27%). The reduction was 26% (range, 10-29%) for combination testing and 3% (range, -1 to 8%) for cytology with HPV triage. For strategies with primary HPV testing, the model also estimated a reduction in cancer cases when the screening interval was extended to 7.5 years. Five-yearly cytology with HPV triage and 5 to 7.5-yearly HPV testing with cytology triage were cost effective for the base-case settings and the majority of calibrated parameter settings (ICER below Dutch willingness-to-pay threshold of euro20,000/QALY). Our model indicates that HPV testing with cytology triage is likely to be cost effective. An extension of the screening interval may be considered to control costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20112339     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  19 in total

1.  Cost-Effectiveness of Primary HPV Testing, Cytology and Co-testing as Cervical Cancer Screening for Women Above Age 30 Years.

Authors:  Xian Wen Jin; Laura Lipold; Julie Foucher; Andrea Sikon; Jennifer Brainard; Jerome Belinson; Sarah Schramm; Kelly Nottingham; Bo Hu; Michael B Rothberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Using the Cancer Risk Management Model to evaluate the health and economic impacts of cytology compared with human papillomavirus DNA testing for primary cervical cancer screening in Canada.

Authors:  C Popadiuk; C L Gauvreau; M Bhavsar; C Nadeau; K Asakawa; W M Flanagan; M C Wolfson; A J Coldman; S Memon; N Fitzgerald; J Lacombe; A B Miller
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Optimizing technology for cervical cancer screening in high-resource settings.

Authors:  Lyndsay A Richardson; Joseph Tota; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-05

4.  Comparison of Hybrid capture 2 testing at different thresholds with cytology as primary cervical screening test.

Authors:  D C Rijkaart; V M H Coupe; F J van Kemenade; D A M Heideman; A T Hesselink; W Verweij; L Rozendaal; R H Verheijen; P J Snijders; J Berkhof; C J L M Meijer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 5.  Modeling preventative strategies against human papillomavirus-related disease in developed countries.

Authors:  Karen Canfell; Harrell Chesson; Shalini L Kulasingam; Johannes Berkhof; Mireia Diaz; Jane J Kim
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening: cytology versus human papillomavirus DNA testing.

Authors:  J van Rosmalen; I M C M de Kok; M van Ballegooijen
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 7.  Human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening and the cut-off level for hybrid capture 2 tests: systematic review.

Authors:  Matejka Rebolj; Jesper Bonde; Sisse Helle Njor; Elsebeth Lynge
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-05-23

8.  Primary screening for human papillomavirus compared with cytology screening for cervical cancer in European settings: cost effectiveness analysis based on a Dutch microsimulation model.

Authors:  Inge M C M de Kok; Joost van Rosmalen; Joakim Dillner; Marc Arbyn; Peter Sasieni; Thomas Iftner; Marjolein van Ballegooijen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-03-05

9.  HPV-DNA testing for cervical cancer precursors: from evidence to clinical practice.

Authors:  M Origoni; P Cristoforoni; S Costa; L Mariani; P Scirpa; A Lorincz; M Sideri
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2012-06-18

10.  Disagreement between human papillomavirus assays: an unexpected challenge for the choice of an assay in primary cervical screening.

Authors:  Matejka Rebolj; Sarah Preisler; Ditte Møller Ejegod; Carsten Rygaard; Elsebeth Lynge; Jesper Bonde
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.