BACKGROUND: Patients with peanut allergy have highly stable pathologic antibody repertoires to the immunodominant B-cell epitopes of the major peanut allergens Ara h 1 to 3. OBJECTIVE: We used a peptide microarray technique to analyze the effect of treatment with peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT) on such repertoires. METHODS: Measurements of total peanut-specific IgE (psIgE) and peanut-specific IgG(4) (psIgG(4)) were made with CAP-FEIA. We analyzed sera from 22 patients with OIT and 6 control subjects and measured serum specific IgE and IgG(4) binding to epitopes of Ara h 1 to 3 using a high-throughput peptide microarray technique. Antibody affinity was measured by using a competitive peptide microarray, as previously described. RESULTS: At baseline, psIgE and psIgG(4) diversity was similar between patients and control subjects, and there was broad variation in epitope recognition. After a median of 41 months of OIT, polyclonal psIgG(4) levels increased from a median of 0.3 μg/mL (interquartile range [25% to 75%], 0.1-0.43 μg/mL) at baseline to 10.5 μg/mL (interquartile range [25% to 75%], 3.95-45.48 μg/mL; P < .0001) and included de novo specificities. psIgE levels were reduced from a median baseline of 85.45 kU(A)/L (23.05-101.0 kU(A)/L) to 7.75 kU(A)/L (2.58-30.55 kU(A)/L, P < .0001). Affinity was unaffected. Although the psIgE repertoire contracted in most OIT-treated patients, several subjects generated new IgE specificities, even as the total psIgE level decreased. Global epitope-specific shifts from IgE to IgG(4) binding occurred, including at an informative epitope of Ara h 2. CONCLUSION: OIT differentially alters Ara h 1 to 3 binding patterns. These changes are variable between patients, are not observed in control subjects, and include a progressive polyclonal increase in IgG(4) levels, with concurrent reduction in IgE amount and diversity.
BACKGROUND:Patients with peanutallergy have highly stable pathologic antibody repertoires to the immunodominant B-cell epitopes of the major peanut allergens Arah 1 to 3. OBJECTIVE: We used a peptide microarray technique to analyze the effect of treatment with peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT) on such repertoires. METHODS: Measurements of total peanut-specific IgE (psIgE) and peanut-specific IgG(4) (psIgG(4)) were made with CAP-FEIA. We analyzed sera from 22 patients with OIT and 6 control subjects and measured serum specific IgE and IgG(4) binding to epitopes of Arah 1 to 3 using a high-throughput peptide microarray technique. Antibody affinity was measured by using a competitive peptide microarray, as previously described. RESULTS: At baseline, psIgE and psIgG(4) diversity was similar between patients and control subjects, and there was broad variation in epitope recognition. After a median of 41 months of OIT, polyclonal psIgG(4) levels increased from a median of 0.3 μg/mL (interquartile range [25% to 75%], 0.1-0.43 μg/mL) at baseline to 10.5 μg/mL (interquartile range [25% to 75%], 3.95-45.48 μg/mL; P < .0001) and included de novo specificities. psIgE levels were reduced from a median baseline of 85.45 kU(A)/L (23.05-101.0 kU(A)/L) to 7.75 kU(A)/L (2.58-30.55 kU(A)/L, P < .0001). Affinity was unaffected. Although the psIgE repertoire contracted in most OIT-treated patients, several subjects generated new IgE specificities, even as the total psIgE level decreased. Global epitope-specific shifts from IgE to IgG(4) binding occurred, including at an informative epitope of Arah 2. CONCLUSION: OIT differentially alters Arah 1 to 3 binding patterns. These changes are variable between patients, are not observed in control subjects, and include a progressive polyclonal increase in IgG(4) levels, with concurrent reduction in IgE amount and diversity.
Authors: Christina Uermösi; Roger R Beerli; Monika Bauer; Vania Manolova; Klaus Dietmeier; Regula B Buser; Thomas M Kündig; Philippe Saudan; Martin F Bachmann Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2010-07-10 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Andrea Vereda; Doerthe A Andreae; Jing Lin; Wayne G Shreffler; Maria Dolores Ibañez; Javier Cuesta-Herranz; Ludmilla Bardina; Hugh A Sampson Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Kirsten Beyer; Lisa Ellman-Grunther; Kirsi-Marjut Järvinen; Robert A Wood; Jonathan Hourihane; Hugh A Sampson Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: C E Rosenberg; M K Mingler; J M Caldwell; M H Collins; P C Fulkerson; D W Morris; V A Mukkada; P E Putnam; T Shoda; T Wen; M E Rothenberg Journal: Allergy Date: 2018-06-17 Impact factor: 13.146
Authors: Emily C McGowan; Gordon R Bloomberg; Peter J Gergen; Cynthia M Visness; Katy F Jaffee; Megan Sandel; George O'Connor; Meyer Kattan; James Gern; Robert A Wood Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2014-08-13 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Rohina Rubicz; Robert Yolken; Armin Alaedini; Eugene Drigalenko; Jac C Charlesworth; Melanie A Carless; Emily G Severance; Bogdana Krivogorsky; Thomas D Dyer; Jack W Kent; Joanne E Curran; Matthew P Johnson; Shelley A Cole; Laura Almasy; Eric K Moses; John Blangero; Harald H H Göring Journal: Genet Epidemiol Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 2.135
Authors: Brian P Vickery; Amy M Scurlock; Michael Kulis; Pamela H Steele; Janet Kamilaris; Jelena P Berglund; Caitlin Burk; Anne Hiegel; Suzanna Carlisle; Lynn Christie; Tamara T Perry; Robbie D Pesek; Saira Sheikh; Yamini Virkud; P Brian Smith; Mohamed H Shamji; Stephen R Durham; Stacie M Jones; A Wesley Burks Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2013-12-19 Impact factor: 10.793