Literature DB >> 23197662

Apoptotic susceptibility to DNA damage of pluripotent stem cells facilitates pharmacologic purging of teratoma risk.

Alyson J Smith1, Natalie G Nelson, Saji Oommen, Katherine A Hartjes, Clifford D Folmes, Andre Terzic, Timothy J Nelson.   

Abstract

Pluripotent stem cells have been the focus of bioengineering efforts designed to generate regenerative products, yet harnessing therapeutic capacity while minimizing risk of dysregulated growth remains a challenge. The risk of residual undifferentiated stem cells within a differentiated progenitor population requires a targeted approach to eliminate contaminating cells prior to delivery. In this study we aimed to validate a toxicity strategy that could selectively purge pluripotent stem cells in response to DNA damage and avoid risk of uncontrolled cell growth upon transplantation. Compared with somatic cell types, embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells displayed hypersensitivity to apoptotic induction by genotoxic agents. Notably, hypersensitivity in pluripotent stem cells was stage-specific and consistently lost upon in vitro differentiation, with the mean half-maximal inhibitory concentration increasing nearly 2 orders of magnitude with tissue specification. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting demonstrated that the innate response was mediated through upregulation of the BH3-only protein Puma in both natural and induced pluripotent stem cells. Pretreatment with genotoxic etoposide purged hypersensitive pluripotent stem cells to yield a progenitor population refractory to teratoma formation upon transplantation. Collectively, this study exploits a hypersensitive apoptotic response to DNA damage within pluripotent stem cells to decrease risk of dysregulated growth and augment the safety profile of transplant-ready, bioengineered progenitor cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23197662      PMCID: PMC3659660          DOI: 10.5966/sctm.2012-0066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med        ISSN: 2157-6564            Impact factor:   6.940


  37 in total

1.  Restoration of an absent G1 arrest and protection from apoptosis in embryonic stem cells after ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Yiling Hong; Peter J Stambrook
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Regulation of ES cell differentiation by functional and conformational modulation of p53.

Authors:  K Sabapathy; M Klemm; R Jaenisch; E F Wagner
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Stress defense in murine embryonic stem cells is superior to that of various differentiated murine cells.

Authors:  Gabriele Saretzki; Lyle Armstrong; Alan Leake; Majlinda Lako; Thomas von Zglinicki
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.277

4.  Multipotent hematopoietic cells susceptible to alternative double-strand break repair pathways that promote genome rearrangements.

Authors:  Richard Francis; Christine Richardson
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  P53-dependent and -independent links between DNA-damage, apoptosis and mutation frequency in ES cells.

Authors:  S W Corbet; A R Clarke; S Gledhill; A H Wyllie
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1999-02-25       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 6.  Stem-cell therapy for cardiac disease.

Authors:  Vincent F M Segers; Richard T Lee
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Mouse embryonic stem cells are hypersensitive to apoptosis triggered by the DNA damage O(6)-methylguanine due to high E2F1 regulated mismatch repair.

Authors:  W P Roos; M Christmann; S T Fraser; B Kaina
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 15.828

8.  Analysis of gene targeting and intrachromosomal homologous recombination stimulated by genomic double-strand breaks in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  G Donoho; M Jasin; P Berg
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Adaptation to culture of human embryonic stem cells and oncogenesis in vivo.

Authors:  Duncan E C Baker; Neil J Harrison; Edna Maltby; Kath Smith; Harry D Moore; Pamela J Shaw; Paul R Heath; Hazel Holden; Peter W Andrews
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Selective apoptosis of pluripotent mouse and human stem cells by novel ceramide analogues prevents teratoma formation and enriches for neural precursors in ES cell-derived neural transplants.

Authors:  Erhard Bieberich; Jeane Silva; Guanghu Wang; Kannan Krishnamurthy; Brian G Condie
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Technical approaches to induce selective cell death of pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Ho-Chang Jeong; Seung-Ju Cho; Mi-Ok Lee; Hyuk-Jin Cha
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 2.  Cell replacement therapies: is it time to reprogram?

Authors:  Harald M Mikkers; Christian Freund; Christine L Mummery; Rob C Hoeben
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 5.695

3.  Reply: Translation of regenerative technologies into clinical paradigms.

Authors:  Atta Behfar; Ruben Crespo-Diaz; Andre Terzic; Bernard J Gersh
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  High Basal Levels of γH2AX in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Are Linked to Replication-Associated DNA Damage and Repair.

Authors:  Haritha Vallabhaneni; Patrick J Lynch; Guibin Chen; Kyeyoon Park; Yangtengyu Liu; Rachel Goehe; Barbara S Mallon; Manfred Boehm; Deborah A Hursh
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 6.277

5.  Rbm20-deficient cardiogenesis reveals early disruption of RNA processing and sarcomere remodeling establishing a developmental etiology for dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Rosanna Beraldi; Xing Li; Almudena Martinez Fernandez; Santiago Reyes; Frank Secreto; Andre Terzic; Timothy M Olson; Timothy J Nelson
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  Selection via pluripotency-related transcriptional screen minimizes the influence of somatic origin on iPSC differentiation propensity.

Authors:  Katherine A Hartjes; Xing Li; Almudena Martinez-Fernandez; Alexa J Roemmich; Brandon T Larsen; Andre Terzic; Timothy J Nelson
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 6.277

7.  Inhibition of DNA topoisomerase II selectively reduces the threat of tumorigenicity following induced pluripotent stem cell-based myocardial therapy.

Authors:  Saranya P Wyles; Satsuki Yamada; Saji Oommen; Joseph J Maleszewski; Rosanna Beraldi; Almudena Martinez-Fernandez; Andre Terzic; Timothy J Nelson
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.272

8.  High-risk human papillomavirus E6 protein promotes reprogramming of Fanconi anemia patient cells through repression of p53 but does not allow for sustained growth of induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Timothy M Chlon; Elizabeth E Hoskins; Christopher N Mayhew; Kathryn A Wikenheiser-Brokamp; Stella M Davies; Parinda Mehta; Kasiani C Myers; James M Wells; Susanne I Wells
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 9.  Metabolic regulation of redox status in stem cells.

Authors:  Ester Perales-Clemente; Clifford D L Folmes; Andre Terzic
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 8.401

10.  Natural cardiogenesis-based template predicts cardiogenic potential of induced pluripotent stem cell lines.

Authors:  Almudena Martinez-Fernandez; Xing Li; Katherine A Hartjes; Andre Terzic; Timothy J Nelson
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Genet       Date:  2013-09-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.