Literature DB >> 23197458

Task-dependent modulation of SI physiological responses to targets and distractors.

Elsie Spingath1, Hyun-Sug Kang, David T Blake.   

Abstract

Selective attention experimental designs have shown that neural responses to stimuli in primary somatosensory cortex are stronger when the sensory stimuli are task relevant. Other studies have used animals under no task demands for data collection. The relationship between neural responses in the brain during behavior, and while an animal has no task demands, remains underexplored. We trained two animals to perform somatosensory detection for several weeks, followed by somatosensory discrimination for several weeks. Data in response to physically identical stimuli were collected from cortical implants while the animal was under no task demands before each behavioral session and also during that behavioral session. The Fourier spectra of the field potentials during detection or discrimination compared with the no task condition demonstrated suppression of the somatosensory μ-rhythm that is associated with readiness and anticipation of cognitive use of somatosensory and motor inputs. Responses to the task target were stronger during detection and discrimination than in the no task condition. The amplitude normalized time course of the target evoked response was similar in both cases. Evoked responses to the task distractor were not significantly stronger during behavior than in recordings under no task demands. The normalized time course of the distractor responses showed a suppression that peaks 30-35 ms after the onset of the response. The selectivity of this within trial suppression is the same as the selectivity of enduring suppression evident in studies of sensory cortical plasticity, which suggests the same neural process may be responsible for both.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23197458      PMCID: PMC3569122          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00385.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  45 in total

1.  Time course of attention reveals different mechanisms for spatial and feature-based attention in area V4.

Authors:  Benjamin Y Hayden; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Independent controls of attentional influences in primary and secondary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  C Elaine Chapman; El-Mehdi Meftah
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Learning to see the difference specifically alters the most informative V4 neurons.

Authors:  Steven Raiguel; Rufin Vogels; Santosh G Mysore; Guy A Orban
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Mu rhythm (de)synchronization and EEG single-trial classification of different motor imagery tasks.

Authors:  G Pfurtscheller; C Brunner; A Schlögl; F H Lopes da Silva
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Experience-dependent adult cortical plasticity requires cognitive association between sensation and reward.

Authors:  David T Blake; Marc A Heiser; Matthew Caywood; Michael M Merzenich
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Neural correlates of tactile detection: a combined magnetoencephalography and biophysically based computational modeling study.

Authors:  Stephanie R Jones; Dominique L Pritchett; Steven M Stufflebeam; Matti Hämäläinen; Christopher I Moore
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Detection of a weak somatosensory stimulus: role of the prestimulus mu rhythm and its top-down modulation.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Mingzhou Ding
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Perceptual learning directs auditory cortical map reorganization through top-down influences.

Authors:  Daniel B Polley; Elizabeth E Steinberg; Michael M Merzenich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Cued spatial attention drives functionally relevant modulation of the mu rhythm in primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Stephanie R Jones; Catherine E Kerr; Qian Wan; Dominique L Pritchett; Matti Hämäläinen; Christopher I Moore
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Different neuroplasticity for task targets and distractors.

Authors:  Elsie Y Spingath; Hyun Sug Kang; Thane Plummer; David T Blake
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Reversible deactivation of higher-order posterior parietal areas. II. Alterations in response properties of neurons in areas 1 and 2.

Authors:  Adam B Goldring; Dylan F Cooke; Mary K L Baldwin; Gregg H Recanzone; Adam G Gordon; Tingrui Pan; Scott I Simon; Leah Krubitzer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The most sensitive inputs to cutaneous representing regions of primary somatosensory cortex do not change with behavioral training.

Authors:  David T Blake; Elsie Spingath
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2015-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.