Literature DB >> 19400673

Detection of a weak somatosensory stimulus: role of the prestimulus mu rhythm and its top-down modulation.

Yan Zhang1, Mingzhou Ding.   

Abstract

The ongoing neural activity in human primary somatosensory cortex (SI) is characterized by field potential oscillations in the 7-13 Hz range known as the mu rhythm. Recent work has shown that the magnitude of the mu oscillation immediately preceding the onset of a weak stimulus has a significant impact on its detection. The neural mechanisms mediating this impact remain not well understood. In particular, whether and how somatosensory mu rhythm is modulated by executive areas prior to stimulus onset for improved behavioral performance has not been investigated. We addressed these issues by recording 128-channel scalp electroencephalogram from normal volunteers performing a somatosensory perception experiment in which they reported the detection of a near-threshold electrical stimulus ( approximately 50% detection rate) delivered to the right index finger. Three results were found. First, consistent with numerous previous reports, the N1 component ( approximately 140 msec) of the somatosensory-evoked potential was significantly enhanced for perceived stimulus compared to unperceived stimulus. Second, the prestimulus mu power and the evoked N1 amplitude exhibited an inverted-U relationship, suggesting that an intermediate level of prestimulus mu oscillatory activity is conducive to stimulus processing and perception. Third, a Granger causality analysis revealed that the prestimulus causal influence in the mu band from prefrontal cortex to SI was significantly higher for perceived stimulus than for unperceived stimulus, indicating that frontal executive structures, via ongoing mu oscillations, exert cognitive control over posterior sensory cortices to facilitate somatosensory processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19400673     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  41 in total

1.  Fluctuations of prestimulus oscillatory power predict subjective perception of tactile simultaneity.

Authors:  Joachim Lange; Johanna Halacz; Hanneke van Dijk; Nina Kahlbrock; Alfons Schnitzler
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Predictability modulates the anticipation and perception of pain in both self and others.

Authors:  Weiwei Peng; Xiaoxuan Huang; Yang Liu; Fang Cui
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Effect of prestimulus alpha power, phase, and synchronization on stimulus detection rates in a biophysical attractor network model.

Authors:  Mikael Lundqvist; Pawel Herman; Anders Lansner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Quantitative analysis and biophysically realistic neural modeling of the MEG mu rhythm: rhythmogenesis and modulation of sensory-evoked responses.

Authors:  Stephanie R Jones; Dominique L Pritchett; Michael A Sikora; Steven M Stufflebeam; Matti Hämäläinen; Christopher I Moore
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Task-dependent modulation of SI physiological responses to targets and distractors.

Authors:  Elsie Spingath; Hyun-Sug Kang; David T Blake
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Prestimulus oscillatory power and connectivity patterns predispose conscious somatosensory perception.

Authors:  Nathan Weisz; Anja Wühle; Gianpiero Monittola; Gianpaolo Demarchi; Julia Frey; Tzvetan Popov; Christoph Braun
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Depicting the inner and outer nose: the representation of the nose and the nasal mucosa on the human primary somatosensory cortex (SI).

Authors:  Mareike Gastl; Yvonne F Brünner; Martin Wiesmann; Jessica Freiherr
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Use of imperceptible wrist vibration to modulate sensorimotor cortical activity.

Authors:  Na Jin Seo; Kishor Lakshminarayanan; Abigail W Lauer; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Brian D Schmit; Colleen A Hanlon; Mark S George; Leonardo Bonilha; Ryan J Downey; Will DeVries; Tibor Nagy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Oscillatory activity in neocortical networks during tactile discrimination near the limit of spatial acuity.

Authors:  Bhim M Adhikari; K Sathian; Charles M Epstein; Bidhan Lamichhane; Mukesh Dhamala
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Shaping functional architecture by oscillatory alpha activity: gating by inhibition.

Authors:  Ole Jensen; Ali Mazaheri
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.