Literature DB >> 23197287

A practical method for assessing nasal skin quality.

M Haluk Ozkul1, Didem Gamze Kocagöz, Hasan Huseyin Balıkcı, Ayşegül Verim, Husamettin Yaşar.   

Abstract

Nasal skin quality is an essential indicator of rhinoplasty outcomes. The objective of this study was to collect data on the nasal skin thickness of randomly selected Turkish men and women. The study involved 50 male and 50 female subjects. We measured the nasal dorsal skin thickness by pinching the sides of the nose upwards to produce a skinfold and then measuring the thickness of this skinfold with a Castroviejo caliper [A&A, Almecon Instruments]. We also measured the thickness of the right and left alar walls with the same caliper. In the male subjects, the mean nasal dorsal thickness and the mean overall, right, and left alar wall thicknesses were 4.02 ± 0.71, 3.99 ± 0.69, 3.98 ± 0.69, and 4.00 ± 0.69 mm, respectively. The corresponding values in the female subjects were 3.38 ± 0.56, 3.45 ± 0.66, 3.43 ± 0.67, and 3.46 ± 0.65 mm. In Turkish men, a nasal dorsum measuring greater than 4 mm can be considered "thick." In Turkish women, the mean nasal dorsal and alar wall thicknesses were 3.38 and 3.45 mm, respectively. Values greater than these are considered "thick." Either nasal dorsal thickness or alar wall thickness may be measured in men, but both must be measured in women scheduled to undergo rhinoplasty. Dark nasal skin and oily nasal skin tend to be thicker.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23197287     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-012-2293-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  9 in total

1.  Primary nasal tip surgery: a conservative approach.

Authors:  Marco Klinger; Fabio Caviggioli; Davide Forcellini; Valeria Bandi; Luca Maione; Valeriano Vinci; Angelo Virgilio Pagliari; Francesco Klinger; Riccardo Francesco Mazzola
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 2.  Grafting in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Michael J Brenner; Peter A Hilger
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.918

3.  The histology of facial aesthetic subunits: implications for common nasal reconstructive procedures.

Authors:  Mark Rahman; Niall Jefferson; David A Stewart; Rema Oliver; William R Walsh; Mark P Gianoutsos
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Anatomy of the nasal profile.

Authors:  K J Anderson; M Henneberg; R M Norris
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Nuances of the nasal tip: rhinoplasty of the thin-skinned nose.

Authors:  Edward H Farrior; John A Ballert
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2012-05-06       Impact factor: 1.446

6.  Predicting the results of rhinoplasty before surgery: Easy noses versus difficult noses.

Authors:  Nabil Fanous; Valérie Julie Brousseau; Naznin Karsan; Amanda Fanous
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2008

7.  Open rhinoplasty for African-American noses.

Authors:  Lucas Gomes Patrocínio; José Antônio Patrocínio
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 1.651

8.  Tutoplast-processed fascia lata for dorsal augmentation in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Yong Ju Jang; Jong Hwan Wang; Vikas Sinha; Hyung Min Song; Bong-Jae Lee
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Fascia lata graft for nasal dorsal contouring in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  M V Karaaltin; K S Orhan; T Demirel
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 2.740

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Does skin thickness affect satisfaction post rhinoplasty? Middle Eastern population as an example.

Authors:  Sami Alharethy; Ahmed Mousa; Ahmed Alharbi; Turki Aldrees; Saleh AlQaryan; Yong Ju Jang
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.484

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.