Literature DB >> 19328758

The histology of facial aesthetic subunits: implications for common nasal reconstructive procedures.

Mark Rahman1, Niall Jefferson, David A Stewart, Rema Oliver, William R Walsh, Mark P Gianoutsos.   

Abstract

Reconstruction of cutaneous nasal defects is often a challenging problem with multiple solutions. Many factors must be considered when deciding on the appropriate reconstructive procedure, including optimally matching donor site skin to the original recipient site skin. To the best of our knowledge no objective study has been undertaken to examine which areas best match the histological features of skin from various nasal cosmetic subunits. We have undertaken a descriptive histological analysis of skin from 25 facial and nasal aesthetic subunits from four male Caucasian cadavers, aged 65-88. The three variables looked at were epidermal thickness, dermal thickness and density of pilosebaceous subunits. Our findings have been plotted on photographs of the face to provide visual maps of facial histological features by cosmetic subunit. Our results show that histologically, the best matched skin for reconstructing a given nasal defect is likely to come from an adjacent nasal subunit. Looking at distant donor sites, the helical root, helical rim and pre-auricular area are closest to nasal skin in terms of dermal thickness. In terms of density of pilosebaceous units, the helical root, pre-auricular area and lateral forehead are the three areas best matched to nasal skin. Copyright (c) 2009 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19328758     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.02.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  6 in total

1.  Reconstruction of small soft tissue nasal defects.

Authors:  Erik M Wolfswinkel; William M Weathers; David Cheng; James F Thornton
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  A practical method for assessing nasal skin quality.

Authors:  M Haluk Ozkul; Didem Gamze Kocagöz; Hasan Huseyin Balıkcı; Ayşegül Verim; Husamettin Yaşar
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Factors affecting outcomes of second intent healing of nasal defects after Mohs micrographic surgery.

Authors:  David Nam-Woo Kim; Nour Kibbi; Sean R Christensen; David J Leffell; Kathleen C Suozzi
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 3.017

4.  Management of congenital midline nasofrontal masses: case report and review of literature.

Authors:  A C Volck; G A Suárez; A J Tasman
Journal:  Case Rep Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-25

5.  Refinement of Nasal Reconstruction with a V/Y-alar-perforator Flap.

Authors:  Dominik L Feinendegen; Martin F Langer; J Camilo Roldán
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-01-30

6.  Aesthetic subunit reconstruction facilitated with v-y island advancement flaps on the face: a case report.

Authors:  Jaime Eduardo Pachón Suárez; Parviz Lionel Sadigh; Seng-Feng Jeng
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-06-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.