Literature DB >> 23193320

Finite state control of a variable impedance hybrid neuroprosthesis for locomotion after paralysis.

Thomas C Bulea1, Rudi Kobetic, Musa L Audu, John R Schnellenberger, Ronald J Triolo.   

Abstract

We have previously reported on a novel variable impedance knee mechanism (VIKM). The VIKM was designed as a component of a hybrid neuroprosthesis to regulate knee flexion. The hybrid neuroprosthesis is a device that uses a controllable brace to support the body against collapse while stimulation provides power for movement. The hybrid neuroprosthesis requires a control system to coordinate the actions of the VIKM with the stimulation system; the development and evaluation of such a controller is presented. Brace mounted sensors and a baseline open loop stimulation pattern are utilized as control signals to activate the VIKM during stance phase while simultaneously modulating muscle stimulation in an on-off fashion. The objective is twofold: reduce the amount of stimulation necessary for walking while simultaneously restoring more biologically correct knee motion during stance using the VIKM. Custom designed hardware and software components were developed for controller implementation. The VIKM hybrid neuroprosthesis (VIKM-HNP) was evaluated during walking in one participant with thoracic level spinal cord injury. In comparison to walking with functional neuromuscular stimulation alone, the VIKM-HNP restored near normal stance phase knee flexion during loading response and pre-swing phases while decreasing knee extensor stimulation by up to 40%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23193320      PMCID: PMC3830532          DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2227124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1534-4320            Impact factor:   3.802


  30 in total

1.  Contributions of muscle forces and toe-off kinematics to peak knee flexion during the swing phase of normal gait: an induced position analysis.

Authors:  Frank C Anderson; Saryn R Goldberg; Marcus G Pandy; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  A clinical comparison of variable-damping and mechanically passive prosthetic knee devices.

Authors:  Jennifer L Johansson; Delsey M Sherrill; Patrick O Riley; Paolo Bonato; Hugh Herr
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.159

3.  Feasibility of a hybrid-FES system for gait restoration in paraplegics.

Authors:  Hugo A Quintero; Ryan J Farris; William K Durfee; Michael Goldfarb
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2010

4.  Design and Control of a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis.

Authors:  Frank Sup; Amit Bohara; Michael Goldfarb
Journal:  Int J Rob Res       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.703

Review 5.  Paraplegic locomotion: a review.

Authors:  A V Nene; H J Hermens; G Zilvold
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.772

6.  Hybrid assistive system--the motor neuroprosthesis.

Authors:  D Popovic; R Tomović; L Schwirtlich
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Energy cost of walking: comparison of "intelligent prosthesis" with conventional mechanism.

Authors:  J G Buckley; W D Spence; S E Solomonidis
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Preliminary evaluation of a controlled-brake orthosis for FES-aided gait.

Authors:  Michael Goldfarb; Kurt Korkowski; Brent Harrold; William Durfee
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  Functional electrical stimulation for walking in paraplegia: 17-year follow-up of 2 cases.

Authors:  Sanjeev Agarwal; Rudi Kobetic; Sanjay Nandurkar; E B Marsolais
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.985

10.  Functional electrical stimulation control of standing and stepping after spinal cord injury: a review of technical characteristics.

Authors:  Gustavo P Braz; Michael Russold; Glen M Davis
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2009-07
View more
  8 in total

1.  Powered Lower-Limb Exoskeletons to Restore Gait for Individuals with Paraplegia - a Review.

Authors:  Sarah R Chang; Rudi Kobetic; Musa L Audu; Roger D Quinn; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  Case Orthop J       Date:  2015

2.  Forward stair descent with hybrid neuroprosthesis after paralysis: Single case study demonstrating feasibility.

Authors:  Thomas C Bulea; Rudi Kobetic; Musa L Audu; John R Schnellenberger; Gilles Pinault; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2014

3.  A Nonlinear Dynamics-Based Estimator for Functional Electrical Stimulation: Preliminary Results From Lower-Leg Extension Experiments.

Authors:  Marcus Allen; Qiang Zhong; Nicholas Kirsch; Ashwin Dani; William W Clark; Nitin Sharma
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Stance controlled knee flexion improves stimulation driven walking after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Thomas C Bulea; Rudi Kobetic; Musa L Audu; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  A muscle-driven approach to restore stepping with an exoskeleton for individuals with paraplegia.

Authors:  Sarah R Chang; Mark J Nandor; Lu Li; Rudi Kobetic; Kevin M Foglyano; John R Schnellenberger; Musa L Audu; Gilles Pinault; Roger D Quinn; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Supplemental Stimulation Improves Swing Phase Kinematics During Exoskeleton Assisted Gait of SCI Subjects With Severe Muscle Spasticity.

Authors:  Andrew Ekelem; Michael Goldfarb
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  An adaptive reflexive control strategy for walking assistance system based on functional electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Hongtao Dong; Jie Hou; Zhaoxi Song; Rui Xu; Lin Meng; Dong Ming
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 5.152

8.  Improving stand-to-sit maneuver for individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Sarah R Chang; Mark J Nandor; Rudi Kobetic; Kevin M Foglyano; Roger D Quinn; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 4.262

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.