Literature DB >> 23190422

Shedding light on light: benefits of anthropogenic illumination to a nocturnally foraging shorebird.

Ross G Dwyer1, Stuart Bearhop, Hamish A Campbell, David M Bryant.   

Abstract

Intertidal habitats provide important feeding areas for migratory shorebirds. Anthropogenic developments along coasts can increase ambient light levels at night across adjacent inter-tidal zones. Here, we report the effects of elevated nocturnal light levels upon the foraging strategy of a migratory shorebird (common redshank Tringa totanus) overwintering on an industrialised estuary in Northern Europe. To monitor behaviour across the full intertidal area, individuals were located by day and night using VHF transmitters, and foraging behaviour was inferred from inbuilt posture sensors. Natural light was scored using moon-phase and cloud cover information and nocturnal artificial light levels were obtained using geo-referenced DMSP/OLS night-time satellite imagery at a 1-km resolution. Under high illumination levels, the commonest and apparently preferred foraging behaviour was sight-based. Conversely, birds feeding in areas with low levels of artificial light had an elevated foraging time and fed by touch, but switched to visual rather than tactile foraging behaviour on bright moonlit nights in the absence of cloud cover. Individuals occupying areas which were illuminated continuously by lighting from a large petrochemical complex invariably exhibited a visually based foraging behaviour independently of lunar phase and cloud cover. We show that ambient light levels affect the timing and distribution of foraging opportunities for redshank. We argue that light emitted from an industrial complex improved nocturnal visibility. This allowed sight-based foraging in place of tactile foraging, implying both a preference for sight-feeding and enhanced night-time foraging opportunities under these conditions. The study highlights the value of integrating remotely sensed data and telemetry techniques to assess the effect of anthropogenic change upon nocturnal behaviour and habitat use.
© 2012 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2012 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial light; DMSP/OLS; foraging strategy; moonlight; shorebirds

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23190422     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  21 in total

1.  Experimental illumination of natural habitat--an experimental set-up to assess the direct and indirect ecological consequences of artificial light of different spectral composition.

Authors:  Kamiel Spoelstra; Roy H A van Grunsven; Maurice Donners; Phillip Gienapp; Martinus E Huigens; Roy Slaterus; Frank Berendse; Marcel E Visser; Elmar Veenendaal
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Reduced light avoidance in spiders from populations in light-polluted urban environments.

Authors:  Tomer J Czaczkes; Ana María Bastidas-Urrutia; Paolo Ghislandi; Cristina Tuni
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2018-10-30

3.  Does light pollution alter daylength? A test using light loggers on free-ranging European blackbirds (Turdus merula).

Authors:  Davide M Dominoni; Jesko Partecke
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Chronobiology of interspecific interactions in a changing world.

Authors:  Noga Kronfeld-Schor; Marcel E Visser; Lucia Salis; Jan A van Gils
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Artificial light at night shifts daily activity patterns but not the internal clock in the great tit (Parus major).

Authors:  Kamiel Spoelstra; Irene Verhagen; Davy Meijer; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Artificial light at night increases growth and reproductive output in Anolis lizards.

Authors:  Christopher J Thawley; Jason J Kolbe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Light at Night and Disrupted Circadian Rhythms Alter Physiology and Behavior.

Authors:  Jacob R Bumgarner; Randy J Nelson
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 3.392

Review 8.  Light at night, clocks and health: from humans to wild organisms.

Authors:  Davide M Dominoni; Jeremy C Borniger; Randy J Nelson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Long-term exposure to artificial light at night in the wild decreases survival and growth of a coral reef fish.

Authors:  Jules Schligler; Daphne Cortese; Ricardo Beldade; Stephen E Swearer; Suzanne C Mills
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  The biological impacts of artificial light at night: the research challenge.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston; Marcel E Visser; Franz Hölker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 6.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.