Literature DB >> 25780241

Experimental illumination of natural habitat--an experimental set-up to assess the direct and indirect ecological consequences of artificial light of different spectral composition.

Kamiel Spoelstra1, Roy H A van Grunsven2, Maurice Donners3, Phillip Gienapp4, Martinus E Huigens5, Roy Slaterus6, Frank Berendse2, Marcel E Visser4, Elmar Veenendaal2.   

Abstract

Artificial night-time illumination of natural habitats has increased dramatically over the past few decades. Generally, studies that assess the impact of artificial light on various species in the wild make use of existing illumination and are therefore correlative. Moreover, studies mostly focus on short-term consequences at the individual level, rather than long-term consequences at the population and community level-thereby ignoring possible unknown cascading effects in ecosystems. The recent change to LED lighting has opened up the exciting possibility to use light with a custom spectral composition, thereby potentially reducing the negative impact of artificial light. We describe here a large-scale, ecosystem-wide study where we experimentally illuminate forest-edge habitat with different spectral composition, replicated eight times. Monitoring of species is being performed according to rigid protocols, in part using a citizen-science-based approach, and automated where possible. Simultaneously, we specifically look at alterations in behaviour, such as changes in activity, and daily and seasonal timing. In our set-up, we have so far observed that experimental lights facilitate foraging activity of pipistrelle bats, suppress activity of wood mice and have effects on birds at the community level, which vary with spectral composition. Thus far, we have not observed effects on moth populations, but these and many other effects may surface only after a longer period of time.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cascading effects; citizen science; daily timing; experimental lighting; population dynamics; seasonal timing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25780241      PMCID: PMC4375369          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  20 in total

1.  Light masking in the field: an experiment with nocturnal and diurnal spiny mice under semi-natural field conditions.

Authors:  Shay Rotics; Tamar Dayan; Ofir Levy; Noga Kronfeld-Schor
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.877

2.  Nocturnal light exposure impairs affective responses in a wavelength-dependent manner.

Authors:  Tracy A Bedrosian; Celynn A Vaughn; Anabel Galan; Ghassan Daye; Zachary M Weil; Randy J Nelson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  The dark side of light at night: physiological, epidemiological, and ecological consequences.

Authors:  Kristen J Navara; Randy J Nelson
Journal:  J Pineal Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 13.007

4.  Shedding light on light: benefits of anthropogenic illumination to a nocturnally foraging shorebird.

Authors:  Ross G Dwyer; Stuart Bearhop; Hamish A Campbell; David M Bryant
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Melatonin: a possible link between the presence of artificial light at night and reductions in biological fitness.

Authors:  Therésa M Jones; Joanna Durrant; Ellie B Michaelides; Mark P Green
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Street lighting disturbs commuting bats.

Authors:  Emma Louise Stone; Gareth Jones; Stephen Harris
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Cone-based vision of rats for ultraviolet and visible lights.

Authors:  G H Jacobs; J A Fenwick; G A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Bat eyes have ultraviolet-sensitive cone photoreceptors.

Authors:  Brigitte Müller; Martin Glösmann; Leo Peichl; Gabriel C Knop; Cornelia Hagemann; Josef Ammermüller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Reducing the ecological consequences of night-time light pollution: options and developments.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston; Thomas W Davies; Jonathan Bennie; John Hopkins
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 6.528

10.  Long-term effects of chronic light pollution on seasonal functions of European blackbirds (Turdus merula).

Authors:  Davide M Dominoni; Michael Quetting; Jesko Partecke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  24 in total

1.  Stressful colours: corticosterone concentrations in a free-living songbird vary with the spectral composition of experimental illumination.

Authors:  Jenny Q Ouyang; Maaike de Jong; Michaela Hau; Marcel E Visser; Roy H A van Grunsven; Kamiel Spoelstra
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Artificial light at night as a new threat to pollination.

Authors:  Eva Knop; Leana Zoller; Remo Ryser; Christopher Gerpe; Maurin Hörler; Colin Fontaine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Response of bats to light with different spectra: light-shy and agile bat presence is affected by white and green, but not red light.

Authors:  Kamiel Spoelstra; Roy H A van Grunsven; Jip J C Ramakers; Kim B Ferguson; Thomas Raap; Maurice Donners; Elmar M Veenendaal; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Effects of nocturnal illumination on life-history decisions and fitness in two wild songbird species.

Authors:  Maaike de Jong; Jenny Q Ouyang; Arnaud Da Silva; Roy H A van Grunsven; Bart Kempenaers; Marcel E Visser; Kamiel Spoelstra
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Effects of the colour of photophase light on locomotor activity in a nocturnal and a diurnal South African rodent.

Authors:  Ingrid van der Merwe; Nigel C Bennett; Abraham Haim; Maria K Oosthuizen
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 6.  Artificial light at night alters behavior in laboratory and wild animals.

Authors:  Kathryn L G Russart; Randy J Nelson
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol       Date:  2018-05-28

Review 7.  Light at night, clocks and health: from humans to wild organisms.

Authors:  Davide M Dominoni; Jeremy C Borniger; Randy J Nelson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  The biological impacts of artificial light at night: the research challenge.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston; Marcel E Visser; Franz Hölker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 6.671

9.  Do Wild Great Tits Avoid Exposure to Light at Night?

Authors:  Maaike de Jong; Jenny Q Ouyang; Roy H A van Grunsven; Marcel E Visser; Kamiel Spoelstra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Density dependence of daily activity in three ungulate species.

Authors:  Juan Ignacio Ramirez; Joeri A Zwerts; Marijke van Kuijk; Palma Iacobelli; Xuqing Li; Natalie Herdoiza; Patrick A Jansen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.