Literature DB >> 30377809

Reduced light avoidance in spiders from populations in light-polluted urban environments.

Tomer J Czaczkes1, Ana María Bastidas-Urrutia2, Paolo Ghislandi3, Cristina Tuni2.   

Abstract

Increased urbanisation is leading to a rise in light pollution. Light pollution can disrupt the behaviour and physiology of animals resulting in increased mortality. However, animals may also benefit from artificial light sources, as these may aggregate prey or signal suitable environments. For example, spiders are commonly seen congregating around artificial light sources. Changes in selective pressures engendered by urban environments are driving changes in urban organisms, driving better adaptation to these environments. Here, we ask whether urban populations of the synanthropic spider Steatoda triangulosa show different responses to light compared to rural populations. Egg-sacs from urban and rural populations were collected and incubated in a common garden setting, and the emerging spiderlings tested for light preference. While rural spiderlings avoided light (37% built webs in the light), urban spiderlings were indifferent to it (49% built webs in the light). Reduced light avoidance may benefit spiders through increased prey capture, increased movement into suitable habitats, or due to a release from selection pressure from visually hunting predators which do not enter buildings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anthropogenic selection; Artificial light at night; Light pollution; Steatoda triangulosa; Urban evolution; Urbanisation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30377809     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-018-1589-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  9 in total

1.  Using the UNOS/SRTR and PHTS Databases to Improve Quality in Pediatric Cardiac Transplantation.

Authors:  Ryan R Davies; Christian Pizarro
Journal:  World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg       Date:  2012-10-01

2.  Artificial light at night as a new threat to pollination.

Authors:  Eva Knop; Leana Zoller; Remo Ryser; Christopher Gerpe; Maurin Hörler; Colin Fontaine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Shedding light on light: benefits of anthropogenic illumination to a nocturnally foraging shorebird.

Authors:  Ross G Dwyer; Stuart Bearhop; Hamish A Campbell; David M Bryant
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 4.  The ecological impacts of nighttime light pollution: a mechanistic appraisal.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston; Jonathan Bennie; Thomas W Davies; John Hopkins
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2013-04-08

5.  Reduced flight-to-light behaviour of moth populations exposed to long-term urban light pollution.

Authors:  Florian Altermatt; Dieter Ebert
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Laparoscopic cytoreductive nephrectomy: a three-center retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Christopher Blick; Simon Bott; Asif Muneer; Neil J Barber; Richard Hindley; Christopher Eden; Mark Sullivan
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 7.  Evolution of life in urban environments.

Authors:  Marc T J Johnson; Jason Munshi-South
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Artificial night light alters nocturnal prey interception outcomes for morphologically variable spiders.

Authors:  Suet Wai Yuen; Timothy C Bonebrake
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 9.  How ecological communities respond to artificial light at night.

Authors:  Dirk Sanders; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol       Date:  2018-04-14
  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Cities as evolutionary experiments: As cities and other man-made environments encroach on natural settings, species evolve to cope.

Authors:  Karl F Gruber
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Orb-weaving spiders are fewer but larger and catch more prey in lit bridge panels from a natural artificial light experiment.

Authors:  Dylan G E Gomes
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 2.984

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.