| Literature DB >> 23189083 |
Kazuki Uemura1, Takehiko Doi, Hiroyuki Shimada, Hyuma Makizako, Daisuke Yoshida, Kota Tsutsumimoto, Yuya Anan, Takao Suzuki.
Abstract
AIMS: The purpose of this study is to clarify the effects of exercise intervention on vascular risk factors in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).Entities:
Keywords: Cholesterol; Cognitive impairment; Dementia; Metabolic profiles; Physical activity; Rehabilitation; Vascular risk factors
Year: 2012 PMID: 23189083 PMCID: PMC3507268 DOI: 10.1159/000343486
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra ISSN: 1664-5464
Fig. 1Subject flow diagram from the initial contact through to study completion.
Baseline characteristics of the study subjects
| Exercise (n = 50) | Control (n = 50) | p value (t test) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 74.8 ± 7.4 | 75.8 ± 6.1 | 0.46 |
| Men | 25 (50) | 26 (52) | 0.84 |
| BMI | 23.4 ± 3.4 | 22.9 ± 3.1 | 0.52 |
| Educational level, years | 10.9 ± 2.8 | 10.3 ± 2.3 | 0.29 |
| Number of medications | 2.5 ± 2.3 | 2.4 ± 2.2 | 0.89 |
| GDS score | 3.8 ± 3.1 | 3.3 ± 2.8 | 0.38 |
| Physical performance | |||
| Grip strength, kg | 24.7 ± 8.1 | 23.5 ± 7.3 | 0.47 |
| Timed up & go, s | 8.8 ± 2.5 | 9.2 ± 2.1 | 0.37 |
| Cognitive function | |||
| MMSE score | 26.8 ± 2.3 | 26.3 ± 2.7 | 0.30 |
| ADAS-cog score | 6.0 ± 2.7 | 6.5 ± 2.8 | 0.37 |
Values are means ± SD or n (%). GDS = Geriatric Depression Scale; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination; ADAS-cog = Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale.
χ2 test.
Fitness-related measurements according to group before and after the intervention (mean ± SD)
| Before | After | F-value | Partial η2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. time effect | 1. time effect | ||||
| 2. time × group | 2. time × group | ||||
| Body weight, kg | exercise group | 56.2 ± 9.6 | 55.2 ± 8.9 | 19.7 | 0.17 |
| control group | 54.2 ± 8.8 | 53.5 ± 8.7 | 0.6 | 0.006 | |
| BMI | exercise group | 23.4 ± 3.3 | 22.9 ± 3.1 | 19.7 | 0.17 |
| control group | 22.8 ± 3.1 | 22.5 ± 3.0 | 0.4 | 0.004 | |
| Systolic, mm Hg | exercise group | 144.6 ± 21.6 | 138.4 ± 20.3 | 17.8 | 0.15 |
| control group | 142.4 ± 19.4 | 132.5 ± 17.5 | 1.0 | 0.01 | |
| Diastolic, mm Hg | exercise group | 74.6 ± 11.7 | 77.9 ± 11.1 | 0.24 | 0.014 |
| control group | 75.1 ± 11.2 | 74.3 ± 9.2 | 3.7 | 0.036 | |
| TC, mg/dl | exercise group | 211.7 ± 36.2 | 193.6 ± 28.1 | 19.3 | 0.16 |
| control group | 200.5 ± 34.6 | 194.7 ± 31.0 | 5.1 | 0.05 | |
| TC/HDL-C risk ratio | exercise group | 3.9 ± 1.0 | 3.7 ± 1.0 | 10.8 | 0.1 |
| control group | 3.8 ± 0.9 | 3.7 ± 0.8 | 0.38 | 0.008 | |
| HDL cholesterol, mg/dl | exercise group | 57.5 ± 16.0 | 55.6 ± 14.6 | 0.3 | 0.01 |
| control group | 55.1 ± 13.2 | 55.2 ± 12.5 | 0.25 | 0.01 | |
| TG, mg/dl | exercise group | 129.2 ± 64.7 | 131.8 ± 57.4 | 0.007 | 0 |
| control group | 138.5 ± 91.5 | 134.7 ± 69.9 | 0.21 | 0.002 | |
| HbA1c, % | exercise group | 5.6 ± 0.8 | 5.6 ± 0.9 | 1.1 | 0.01 |
| control group | 5.4 ± 0.5 | 5.4 ± 0.4 | 0.05 | 0.001 | |
| 6MWT distance, m | exercise group | 378.0 ± 78.4 | 445.9 ± 97.8 | 81.5 | 0.45 |
| control group | 363.5 ± 63.0 | 402.9 ± 70.7 | 5.7 | 0.06 | |
Significant difference between before and after the training within the group (Bonferroni, p < 0.025).
Significant difference between before and after the training within the group (Bonferroni, p < 0.005).
p < 0.01;
p < 0.05.
Fig. 2The average values of TC (a) and 6MWT distance (b) in the exercise and control groups before and after the intervention. ** Significant difference between before and after the training within the group (Bonferroni post hoc test, p < 0.005).