OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of aerobic exercise training on neurocognitive performance. Although the effects of exercise on neurocognition have been the subject of several previous reviews and meta-analyses, they have been hampered by methodological shortcomings and are now outdated as a result of the recent publication of several large-scale, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review of RCTs examining the association between aerobic exercise training on neurocognitive performance between January 1966 and July 2009. Suitable studies were selected for inclusion according to the following criteria: randomized treatment allocation; mean age > or =18 years of age; duration of treatment >1 month; incorporated aerobic exercise components; supervised exercise training; the presence of a nonaerobic-exercise control group; and sufficient information to derive effect size data. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies met inclusion criteria and were included in our analyses, representing data from 2049 participants and 234 effect sizes. Individuals randomly assigned to receive aerobic exercise training demonstrated modest improvements in attention and processing speed (g = 0.158; 95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.055-0.260; p = .003), executive function (g = 0.123; 95% CI, 0.021-0.225; p = .018), and memory (g = 0.128; 95% CI, 0.015-0.241; p = .026). CONCLUSIONS: Aerobic exercise training is associated with modest improvements in attention and processing speed, executive function, and memory, although the effects of exercise on working memory are less consistent. Rigorous RCTs are needed with larger samples, appropriate controls, and longer follow-up periods.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of aerobic exercise training on neurocognitive performance. Although the effects of exercise on neurocognition have been the subject of several previous reviews and meta-analyses, they have been hampered by methodological shortcomings and are now outdated as a result of the recent publication of several large-scale, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review of RCTs examining the association between aerobic exercise training on neurocognitive performance between January 1966 and July 2009. Suitable studies were selected for inclusion according to the following criteria: randomized treatment allocation; mean age > or =18 years of age; duration of treatment >1 month; incorporated aerobic exercise components; supervised exercise training; the presence of a nonaerobic-exercise control group; and sufficient information to derive effect size data. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies met inclusion criteria and were included in our analyses, representing data from 2049 participants and 234 effect sizes. Individuals randomly assigned to receive aerobic exercise training demonstrated modest improvements in attention and processing speed (g = 0.158; 95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.055-0.260; p = .003), executive function (g = 0.123; 95% CI, 0.021-0.225; p = .018), and memory (g = 0.128; 95% CI, 0.015-0.241; p = .026). CONCLUSIONS: Aerobic exercise training is associated with modest improvements in attention and processing speed, executive function, and memory, although the effects of exercise on working memory are less consistent. Rigorous RCTs are needed with larger samples, appropriate controls, and longer follow-up periods.
Authors: A F Kramer; S Hahn; N J Cohen; M T Banich; E McAuley; C R Harrison; J Chason; E Vakil; L Bardell; R A Boileau; A Colcombe Journal: Nature Date: 1999-07-29 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Ronald A Cohen; Athena Poppas; Daniel E Forman; Karin F Hoth; Andreana P Haley; John Gunstad; Angela L Jefferson; David F Tate; Robert H Paul; Lawrence H Sweet; Mokato Ono; Beth A Jerskey; Marie Gerhard-Herman Journal: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol Date: 2008-06-16 Impact factor: 2.475
Authors: C D Mulrow; M B Gerety; D Kanten; J E Cornell; L A DeNino; L Chiodo; C Aguilar; M B O'Neil; J Rosenberg; R M Solis Journal: JAMA Date: 1994-02-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Brian A Gordon; Elena I Rykhlevskaia; Carrie R Brumback; Yukyung Lee; Steriani Elavsky; James F Konopack; Edward McAuley; Arthur F Kramer; Stanley Colcombe; Gabriele Gratton; Monica Fabiani Journal: Psychophysiology Date: 2008-07-04 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Ross Andel; Michael Crowe; Nancy L Pedersen; Laura Fratiglioni; Boo Johansson; Margaret Gatz Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Joan Lindsay; Danielle Laurin; René Verreault; Réjean Hébert; Barbara Helliwell; Gerry B Hill; Ian McDowell Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2002-09-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Brian M Sandroff; Rachel E Klaren; Lara A Pilutti; Deirdre Dlugonski; Ralph H B Benedict; Robert W Motl Journal: J Neurol Date: 2013-12-10 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Regina L Leckie; Stephen B Manuck; Neha Bhattacharjee; Matthew F Muldoon; Janine M Flory; Kirk I Erickson Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: James A Blumenthal; Patrick J Smith; Stephanie Mabe; Alan Hinderliter; Kathleen Welsh-Bohmer; Jeffrey N Browndyke; Pao-Hwa Lin; William Kraus; P Murali Doraiswamy; James Burke; Andrew Sherwood Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2017 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Prativa Sherchan; Fayth Miles; Michael Orlich; Gary Fraser; John H Zhang; Konrad Talbot; Penelope J Duerksen-Hughes Journal: Transl Stroke Res Date: 2020-02-15 Impact factor: 6.829