| Literature DB >> 20890449 |
Michelle W Voss1, Ruchika S Prakash, Kirk I Erickson, Chandramallika Basak, Laura Chaddock, Jennifer S Kim, Heloisa Alves, Susie Heo, Amanda N Szabo, Siobhan M White, Thomas R Wójcicki, Emily L Mailey, Neha Gothe, Erin A Olson, Edward McAuley, Arthur F Kramer.
Abstract
Research has shown the human brain is organized into separable functional networks during rest and varied states of cognition, and that aging is associated with specific network dysfunctions. The present study used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine low-frequency (0.008 < f < 0.08 Hz) coherence of cognitively relevant and sensory brain networks in older adults who participated in a 1-year intervention trial, comparing the effects of aerobic and non-aerobic fitness training on brain function and cognition. Results showed that aerobic training improved the aging brain's resting functional efficiency in higher-level cognitive networks. One year of walking increased functional connectivity between aspects of the frontal, posterior, and temporal cortices within the Default Mode Network and a Frontal Executive Network, two brain networks central to brain dysfunction in aging. Length of training was also an important factor. Effects in favor of the walking group were observed only after 12 months of training, compared to non-significant trends after 6 months. A non-aerobic stretching and toning group also showed increased functional connectivity in the DMN after 6 months and in a Frontal Parietal Network after 12 months, possibly reflecting experience-dependent plasticity. Finally, we found that changes in functional connectivity were behaviorally relevant. Increased functional connectivity was associated with greater improvement in executive function. Therefore the study provides the first evidence for exercise-induced functional plasticity in large-scale brain systems in the aging brain, using functional connectivity techniques, and offers new insight into the role of aerobic fitness in attenuating age-related brain dysfunction.Entities:
Keywords: aerobic fitness; aging; default mode network; executive function; exercise; fMRI; functional connectivity
Year: 2010 PMID: 20890449 PMCID: PMC2947936 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2010.00032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.750
Participant demographics.
| Randomly assigned | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Young adult control | FTB control | Walkers | Young-old | FTB-walk |
| 32 | 35 | 30 | |||
| Age (SD) | 23.91 (4.44) | 65.37 (5.24) | 67.30 (5.80) | *** | NS |
| % Female | 85 | 71 | 73 | NS | NS |
| Education | 16.80 (2.12) | 15.87 (2.73) | 15.93 (2.84) | NS | NS |
| mMMSE | na | 54.83 (1.87) | 55.23 (1.43) | na | NS |
.
.
Fitness, BMI, and adherence for exercise groups.
| Mean (SD) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Baseline | 6 months | 12 months |
| 21.40 (4.13) | 21.28 (4.55) | 21.30 (4.39) | |
| BMI | 28.35 (4.10) | 28.45 (4.39) | 28.49 (4.50) |
| Adherence | 83.38 (13.46) | 80.28 (13.50) | |
| 21.20 (4.13) | 21.53 (4.64) | 22.17 (5.05) | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 28.48 (4.42) | 28.10 (4.39) | 28.30 (4.66) |
| Adherence | 78.13 (14.31) | 76.00 (14.87) | |
.
Regions with increased functional connectivity for Young compared to Elderly adults in top-down and default mode networks.
| Region | ROI abbreviation | MNI coordinates ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Posterior cingulate cortex | PCC | 8, −56, 30 | Initial seed |
| Frontal medial cortex | FMC | −2, 54, −12 | 6.38 |
| Left middle temporal gyrus | LMTGa | −52, −18, −18 | 6.00 |
| Left middle frontal gyrus | LMFG | −30, 20, 50 | 5.90 |
| Right middle temporal gyrus | RMTGa | 58, −10, −18 | 5.11 |
| Left parahippocampal gyrus | LPHGb | −24, −26, −20 | 4.03 |
| Left lateral parietal cortex | LLOCc | −44, −72, 34 | 3.63 |
| Right parahippocampal cortex | RPHGb | 24, −26, −20 | 3.25 |
| Right lateral parietal cortex | RLOCc | 54, −62, 32 | 2.82 |
| Right anterior prefrontal cortex | RALPFC | 32, 40, 28 | Initial seed |
| Right insular cortex | RINSd | 38, 4, −2 | 5.38 |
| Left prefrontal cortex | LPFCe | −36, 34, 28 | 4.90 |
| Right prefrontal cortex | RPFCe | 32, 42, 36 | 4.69 |
| Left insular cortex | LINSd | −38, 8, −4 | 4.59 |
| Right inferior frontal cortex | RIFGf | 34, 48, −6 | 4.35 |
| Left inferior frontal cortex | LIFGf | −38, 48, 8 | 3.29 |
| Right inferior parietal sulcus | RIPS | 25, −62, 53 | Initial seed |
| Right ventral visual cortex | RVVISg | 36, −62, 0 | 6.94 |
| Left ventral visual cortex | LVVISg | −44, −62, −6 | 5.82 |
| Right frontal opercular/insular cortex | RFOI | 28, 26, 8 | 5.12 |
| Right supramarginal gyrus | RSMG | 32, −38, 38 | 3.58 |
| Right lateral occipital cortex | RLOC | 26, −64, 54 | 3.51 |
ROIs with like subscripts were combined to make bilateral ROIs. See Figure .
Regions with increased functional connectivity for Young compared to Elderly adults in sensorimotor and auditory cortex.
| Region | ROI Abbreviation | MNI coordinates ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Right precentral gyrus | RMOT | 32, −10, 52 | Initial seed |
| Left occipital fusiform gyrus | LFG | −30, −68, 0 | 5.71 |
| Left inferior temporal gyrus | LITG | −42, −46, −16 | 4.60 |
| Right insular cortex | RIC | 34, −4, 10 | 4.57 |
| Right temporal fusiform cortex | RTF | 40, −26, −20 | 4.43 |
| Left putamen | LPUT | −28, −4, 14 | 4.41 |
| Right heschl's gyrus | RAUD | 46, −18, 8 | Initial seed |
| Left central opercular cortex/heschl's gyrus | LCO | −50, −20, 14 | 5.63 |
| Left cingulate gyrus | LCG | −4, −16, 44 | 4.80 |
| Right heschl's gyrus | RHG | 54, −20, 12 | 4.50 |
| Left insular cortex | LIC | −34, −4, 12 | 4.37 |
| Left superior frontal gyrus | LSFG | −24, −8, 64 | 4.29 |
Age-related disruption in these ROIs was not sensitive to fitness intervention.
Figure 1Mean statistical maps for the average of old and young subjects, for cognitive networks, are illustrated in Figure .
Regions with increased functional connectivity for Olders compared to Young adults in top-down and default mode networks.
| Region | ROI abbreviation | MNI coordinates ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Posterior Cingulate Cortex | PCC | 8, −56, 30 | Initial seed |
| Left insular cortex | LINSa | −32, 12, 4 | 5.43 |
| Right insular cortex | RINSa | 30, 14, 4 | 5.01 |
| Right parietooccipital sulcus | RPS | 14, −82, 48 | 4.69 |
| Left occipital fusiform gyrus | LFGb | −16, −80, −8 | 4.53 |
| Right occipital fusiform gyrus | RFGb | 26, −62, −8 | 4.41 |
| Right supramarginal gyrus | RSMG | 62, −34, 44 | 4.23 |
| Right precentral gyrus | RPCG | 40, −4, 38 | 3.99 |
| Right anterior prefrontal cortex | RALPFC | 32, 40, 28 | Initial seed |
| Left temporal pole | LTP | −44, 20, −24 | 5.54 |
| Right middle temporal gyrus | RMTGa | 70, −14, −16 | 5.27 |
| Left hippocampus/anterior parahippocampal gyrus | LHC/PHGa | −16, −8,24 | 5.24 |
| Left hippocampus | LHC | −24, −22, −18 | 4.94 |
| Ventral frontal medial cortex | FMCv | −8, 54, -18 | 4.82 |
| Anterior frontal medial cortex | FMCa | −12, 66, 18 | 4.66 |
| Left middle temporal gyrus | LMTGa | −56, −10, −22 | 4.03 |
| Right inferior parietal sulcus | RIPS | 25, −62, 53 | Initial seed |
| Left lateral occipital cortex | LLOCa | −56, −68, 36 | 5.93 |
| Right subcallosal frontal medial cortex | FMCsc | 2, 20, −22 | 5.69 |
| Right lateral occipital cortex | RLOCa | 58, −60, 38 | 5.32 |
| Cingulate gyrus | CG | 0, −10, 32 | 5.16 |
| Posterior cingulate gyrus | PCC | −10, −54, 36 | 5.04 |
| Frontal medial cortex | FMC | 2, 44, 18 | 4.94 |
| Ventral frontal medial cortex | FMCv | 0, 48, 0 | 4,85 |
ROIs with like subscripts were combined to make bilateral ROIs; see Figure .
Figure 2Significant effects in favor of the FTB group, in regions reflecting age-related network disruption, in the DMN. (A, B) and the FP network (C), are visualized by plotting marginal group means from the analysis at the corresponding time point (error bars represent 1 ± standard error of the marginal mean); *p < 0.05. Refer to Table 3 for anatomical description and MNI coordinates of ROIs represented by black circles. For all brains, R = R and L = L.
Figure 3Significant effects in favor of the walking group, in regions reflecting age-related network disruption, in the DMN. (A–C) and the FE network (D), are visualized by plotting marginal group means from the analysis at the corresponding time point (error bars represent 1 ± standard error of the marginal mean); *p < 0.05. Refer to Table 3 for anatomical description and MNI coordinates of ROIs represented by black circles. For all brains, R = R and L = L.
Figure 4Exercise training-related changes in functional connectivity in regions where old started greater than young. Significant effects, from FE network, visualized by plotting marginal group means from the analysis at the corresponding time point (error bars represent 1 + standard error of the marginal mean); *p < 0.05. Refer to Table 4 for anatomical description and MNI coordinates of ROIs represented by black circles. For all brains, R = R and L = L.
Principle component loadings of primary cognitive measures at baseline assessment; only component loadings > 0.40 are shown.
| Component 1 | Component 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Forward span | 0.872 | |
| Backward span | 0.816 | |
| Spatial working memory | 0.715 | |
| Local switch cost | 0.660 | |
| Perseverative errors | 0.734 |