Literature DB >> 23188411

Comparison of the clinical outcomes between fresh blastocyst and vitrified-thawed blastocyst transfer.

Pei-Yun Ku1, Robert Kuo-Kuang Lee, Shyr-Yeu Lin, Ming-Huei Lin, Yuh-Ming Hwu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes between fresh and vitrified-thawed day 5 blastocyst transfers.
DESIGN: Retrospective case control study.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENT(S): Patients 38 years of age or less who underwent IVF/ICSI cycles with fresh or frozen-thawed blastocysts transferred from June 1, 2009 to November 30, 2011 INTERVENTION(S): Vitrification and thawing of day 5 blastocysts using the Cryotop method. (Kitazato BioPharma Co., Ltd., Fuji city, Shizuoka, Japan) MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, and multiple pregnancy rates.
RESULTS: Of the 118 cycles in the fresh transfer group, 234 blastocysts were transferred. The clinical pregnancy rate was 66.1 % and implantation rate was 50.9 %. The ongoing pregnancy rate was 56.8 % and the rates for singleton and twin pregnancies were 53.7 % and 44.8 %. Of the 59 cycles in the vitrified-thawed group, 111 blastocysts were transferred. The clinical pregnancy rate was 59.3 % and implantation rate was 43.2 %. The ongoing pregnancy rate was 47.5 % and the rates for singleton and twin pregnancies were 60.7 % and 39.3 %. The clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy rate did not differ significantly between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The implantation rates were not significantly different between the fresh and the vitrified-thawed groups. Thus, single embryo transfer may be considered in fresh cycles to decrease multiple pregnancy rates. The surplus embryos should be vitrified for the frozen embryo transfer to improve the cumulative pregnancy rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23188411      PMCID: PMC3528874          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-012-9874-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  14 in total

1.  Can fresh embryo transfers be replaced by cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfers in assisted reproductive cycles? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Abbas Aflatoonian; Homa Oskouian; Shahnaz Ahmadi; Leila Oskouian
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Vitrification vs. slow cooling protocol using embryos cryopreserved in the 5th or 6th day after oocyte retrieval and IVF outcomes.

Authors:  Paweł Kuć; Agnieszka Kuczyńska; Bozena Stankiewicz; Piotr Sieczyński; Joanna Matysiak; Waldemar Kuczyński
Journal:  Folia Histochem Cytobiol       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 1.698

Review 3.  Choosing between day 3 and day 5 embryo transfers.

Authors:  David K Gardner; Basak Balaban
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.190

4.  Cryopreserved human blastocysts after vitrification result in excellent implantation and clinical pregnancy rates.

Authors:  Seung Wook Hong; Vicken Sepilian; Hyung Min Chung; Thomas Jin Kim
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009.

Authors:  F Zegers-Hochschild; G D Adamson; J de Mouzon; O Ishihara; R Mansour; K Nygren; E Sullivan; S Vanderpoel
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at -196 degrees C by vitrification.

Authors:  W F Rall; G M Fahy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Feb 14-20       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Analysis of global gene expression following mouse blastocyst cryopreservation.

Authors:  M G Larman; M G Katz-Jaffe; B McCallie; J A Filipovits; D K Gardner
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Cryopreserved-thawed human embryo transfer: spontaneous natural cycle is superior to human chorionic gonadotropin-induced natural cycle.

Authors:  Human Mousavi Fatemi; Dimitra Kyrou; Claire Bourgain; Etienne Van den Abbeel; Georg Griesinger; Paul Devroey
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 9.  Vitrification can be more favorable than slow cooling.

Authors:  Lilia L Kuleshova; Alex Lopata
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Gene expression profile of human endometrial receptivity: comparison between natural and stimulated cycles for the same patients.

Authors:  D Haouzi; S Assou; K Mahmoud; S Tondeur; T Rème; B Hedon; J De Vos; S Hamamah
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  10 in total

1.  Human chorionic gonadotropin levels are equally predictive for pregnancy outcome after fresh and vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer.

Authors:  Milan Reljič; Jure Knez; Veljko Vlaisavljević
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Peri-implantation hormonal milieu: elucidating mechanisms of abnormal placentation and fetal growth.

Authors:  Monica A Mainigi; Devvora Olalere; Irina Burd; Carmen Sapienza; Marisa Bartolomei; Christos Coutifaris
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 3.  Comparison of pregnancy outcomes after vitrification at the cleavage and blastocyst stage: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  MeiFang Zeng; SuQin Su; LiuMing Li
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Predictive value of spindle retardance in embryo implantation rate.

Authors:  Sabela García-Oro; María Isabel Rey; Marta Rodríguez; Ángel Durán; Roque Devesa; Diana Valverde
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Survival, re-expansion and cell survival of human blastocysts following vitrification and warming using two vitrification systems.

Authors:  Ana S Lopes; Veerle Frederickx; Gunther Van Kerkhoven; Rudi Campo; Patrick Puttemans; Stephan Gordts
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Accumulation of oocytes and/or embryos by vitrification: a new strategy for managing poor responder patients undergoing pre implantation diagnosis.

Authors:  Alexia Chatziparasidou; Martine Nijs; Martha Moisidou; Oraiopoulou Chara; Christina Ioakeimidou; Christos Pappas; Nicos Christoforidis
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2013-11-12

7.  Assessment of clinical application of preimplantation genetic screening on cryopreserved human blastocysts.

Authors:  Min Liu; Yu Su; Wei-Hua Wang
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 5.211

8.  Impact of elective frozen vs. fresh embryo transfer strategies on cumulative live birth: Do deleterious effects still exist in normal & hyper responders?

Authors:  Fazilet Kubra Boynukalin; Niyazi Emre Turgut; Meral Gultomruk; Selen Ecemis; Zalihe Yarkiner; Necati Findikli; Mustafa Bahceci
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  15 years of transcriptomic analysis on endometrial receptivity: what have we learnt?

Authors:  Soumaya Messaoudi; Imane El Kasmi; Amelie Bourdiec; Kimberley Crespo; Laurence Bissonnette; Cecile Le Saint; François Bissonnette; Isaac-Jacques Kadoch
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2019-08-05

10.  Comparison of pregnancy rate between fresh embryo transfers and frozen-thawed embryo transfers following ICSI treatment.

Authors:  Zahra Basirat; Hajar Adib Rad; Sedigheh Esmailzadeh; Seyed Gholam Ali Jorsaraei; Karimollah Hajian-Tilaki; Hajar Pasha; Faeze Ghofrani
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd)       Date:  2016-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.