Literature DB >> 12215314

Vitrification can be more favorable than slow cooling.

Lilia L Kuleshova1, Alex Lopata.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cryopreservation of embryos and oocytes has become an essential service for infertility treatment. The clinical application of this technology should ensure optimal survival of the embryos and oocytes that are stored and subsequently thawed for transfer. The aim of this review is to compare the widely employed slow cooling procedures with vitrification to evaluate and recommend the more effective and safer procedure.
DESIGN: The review is mainly based on a comparison of the principles, procedures, and results reported in the literature. A historical description of vitrification and personal experiences with this technology are also included.
SETTING: University-based hospitals and private clinics that treat infertility and have published information on cryopreservation. PATIENT(S): Women being treated for infertility and reproductive technology clinics. INTERVENTION(S): The application of slow cooling involving a range of cooling rates is compared with vitrification using rapid and ultrarapid cooling in simple containers. The purpose of both techniques is the induction of a glasslike state in cells to protect them from damage by ice crystals. The early development of vitrification involved the use of long pre-equilibration procedures. Improved methods resulted from the use of mixtures of penetrating and nonpenetrating solutes that are not toxic and a range of cooling rates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Reported number of pregnancies established after transfer of embryos that were cryopreserved by vitrification, or transfer of embryos derived from vitrified oocytes. RESULT(S): Both slow cooling and vitrification procedures have resulted in the successful cryopreservation of human embryos and oocytes. Both procedures have resulted in healthy births, although the slow cooling of oocytes gives very low success rates. Vitrification is a promising novel technique in assisted reproductive technology, but comparative success rates are yet to be established. CONCLUSION(S): Vitrification is a simple procedure that requires less time and is likely to become safer and more cost effective than slow cooling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12215314     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03305-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  33 in total

1.  Can fresh embryo transfers be replaced by cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfers in assisted reproductive cycles? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Abbas Aflatoonian; Homa Oskouian; Shahnaz Ahmadi; Leila Oskouian
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Impact of vitrification on the meiotic spindle and components of the microtubule-organizing center in mouse mature oocytes.

Authors:  Aileen N Tamura; Thomas T F Huang; Yusuke Marikawa
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 4.285

3.  The effect of solution nonideality on modeling transmembrane water transport and diffusion-limited intracellular ice formation during cryopreservation.

Authors:  Gang Zhao; Hiroshi Takamatsu; Xiaoming He
Journal:  J Appl Phys       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Melatonin modulates the expression of BCL-xl and improve the development of vitrified embryos obtained by IVF in mice.

Authors:  Maryam Dehghani-Mohammadabadi; Mohammad Salehi; Fattaneh Farifteh; Sedigheh Nematollahi; Ehsan Arefian; Atena Hajjarizadeh; Kazem Parivar; Zahra Nourmohammadi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Use of the natural cycle and vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer results in better in-vitro fertilization outcomes : cycle regimens of vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer.

Authors:  Eun Mi Chang; Ji Eun Han; You Shin Kim; Sang Woo Lyu; Woo Sik Lee; Tae Ki Yoon
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Modeling and experimental studies of enhanced cooling by medical gauze for cell cryopreservation by vitrification.

Authors:  Yuntian Zhang; Gang Zhao; S M Chapal Hossain; Xiaoming He
Journal:  Int J Heat Mass Transf       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 5.584

7.  Closed-system solid surface vitrification versus slow programmable freezing of mouse 2-cell embryos.

Authors:  Teraporn Vutyavanich; Opas Sreshthaputra; Waraporn Piromlertamorn; Siriporn Nunta
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  The presence of 1 mM glycine in vitrification solutions protects oocyte mitochondrial homeostasis and improves blastocyst development.

Authors:  Deirdre Zander-Fox; Kara S Cashman; Michelle Lane
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  First successful birth of twins in India following the transfer of vitrified oocytes.

Authors:  Priya Selvaraj; Kamala Selvaraj; Kalaichelvi Srinivasan
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2010-01

10.  Cryopreservation of neurospheres derived from human glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Yuk-Kien Chong; Tan-Boon Toh; Norazean Zaiden; Anuradha Poonepalli; Siew Hong Leong; Catherine Ee Ling Ong; Yiting Yu; Patrick B Tan; Siew-Ju See; Wai-Hoe Ng; Ivan Ng; Manoor P Hande; Oi Lian Kon; Beng-Ti Ang; Carol Tang
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.