Literature DB >> 25381622

Survival, re-expansion and cell survival of human blastocysts following vitrification and warming using two vitrification systems.

Ana S Lopes1, Veerle Frederickx, Gunther Van Kerkhoven, Rudi Campo, Patrick Puttemans, Stephan Gordts.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated and compared survival, re-expansion, and percentage of live cells of individual Days 5 and 6 human blastocysts that were vitrified and warmed with the Vit Kit Freeze/Thaw (Irvine Scientific, CA), or with two protocols using the Global Fast Freeze/Thaw Kits (LifeGlobal, Canada).
METHODS: Frozen/thawed Day 2-3 or discarded embryos were cultured to blastocyst (culture day 5-6). Group 1 blastocysts were vitrified with the Vit Kit (n = 29) and High Security Vitrification (HSV) devices. Group 2 (n = 47) and Group 3 (n = 48) blastocysts were cryopreserved with the Global Fast Freeze Kit and 0.25 ml straws, using a direct plunge or a -100 °C holding step, respectively. Group 4 (Controls, n = 30) were not vitrified. Blastocysts were subsequently cultured for 24 h, assessed for survival and expansion, and then stained individually with propidium iodide and Hoechst. Live and total cell number was assessed with ImageJ (NIH), and the percentage of live cells calculated for each blastocyst.
RESULTS: The percentage of live cells was not different between vitrified and control (non-vitrified) blastocysts, thus vitrification did not affect cell survival. Survival (following thawing and after 24 h culture), re-expansion, and percentage of live cells were not different for blastocysts vitrified and warmed between the two vitrification/warming kits, or between the two protocols for the Global Fast Freeze/Thaw Kits.
CONCLUSIONS: Blastocyst vitrification can be achieved with equal success using simplified protocols and cheaper and easy to load freezing straws, providing simultaneously increased safety, and efficiency with lower cost, when compared with vitrification using specialized embryo vitrification devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25381622      PMCID: PMC4294875          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-014-0373-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  24 in total

Review 1.  Slow freezing, vitrification and ultra-rapid freezing of human embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Faten F AbdelHafez; Nina Desai; Ahmed M Abou-Setta; Tommaso Falcone; James Goldfarb
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 3.828

2.  Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination.

Authors:  Masashige Kuwayama; Gábor Vajta; Shoko Ieda; Osamu Kato
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.828

3.  Cryotop vitrification of human oocytes results in high survival rate and healthy deliveries.

Authors:  Monica Antinori; Emanuele Licata; Gianluca Dani; Fabrizio Cerusico; Caterina Versaci; Severino Antinori
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.828

4.  Ultrastructure of preimplantation genetic diagnosis-derived human blastocysts grown in a coculture system after vitrification.

Authors:  María-José Escribá; Carmen Escobedo-Lucea; Amparo Mercader; María-José de los Santos; Antonio Pellicer; José Remohí
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Vitrification of mouse embryos with super-cooled air.

Authors:  Mark G Larman; David K Gardner
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Cytoskeletal analysis of human blastocysts by confocal laser scanning microscopy following vitrification.

Authors:  Katerina Chatzimeletiou; Ewan E Morrison; Yannis Panagiotidis; Pierre Vanderzwalmen; Nikos Prapas; Yannis Prapas; Basil C Tarlatzis; Alan H Handyside
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 7.  Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kalliopi E Loutradi; Efstratios M Kolibianakis; Christos A Venetis; Evangelos G Papanikolaou; George Pados; Ioannis Bontis; Basil C Tarlatzis
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Bovine blastocyst development in vitro: timing, sex, and viability following vitrification.

Authors:  Tshimangadzo L Nedambale; András Dinnyés; Xiangzhong Yang; X Cindy Tian
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 4.285

9.  Design of vitrification solutions for the cryopreservation of embryos.

Authors:  J Ali; J N Shelton
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1993-11

10.  A closed system supports the developmental competence of human embryos after vitrification : Closed vitrification of human embryos.

Authors:  Shu Hashimoto; Ami Amo; Satoko Hama; Kanako Ohsumi; Yoshiharu Nakaoka; Yoshiharu Morimoto
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 3.412

View more
  6 in total

1.  Should the flexibility enabled by performing a day-4 embryo transfer remain as a valid option in the IVF laboratory? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Simopoulou; K Sfakianoudis; P Tsioulou; A Rapani; E Maziotis; P Giannelou; S Grigoriadis; A Pantou; K Nikolettos; N Vlahos; K Pantos; M Koutsilieris
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Pregnancy rates after pre-implantation genetic screening for aneuploidy are only superior when trophectoderm biopsy is performed on hatching embryos.

Authors:  Sonali Singh; Elie Hobeika; Eric S Knochenhauer; Michael L Traub
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Comparison of vitrified outcomes between human early blastocysts and expanded blastocysts.

Authors:  Wen-Yan Song; Xue-Gai Wang; Hai-Xia Jin; Gui-Dong Yao; Xiang-Yang Zhang; Sen-Lin Shi; Hong-Yi Yang; Zhao-Feng Peng; Ying-Pu Sun
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.416

4.  The Vienna consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of art laboratory performance indicators.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2017-08-04

5.  The effect of fresh IVF cycle characteristics on frozen embryo transfer (FET) outcomes.

Authors:  Nayla J Bushaqer; Noor N Alkhudhairy; Ziyad M Alturaigi; Rowaida M Alhamad; Wadha A Mohawesh; Fatema E Alraka; Hisham A Ayyoub; M Dayou Nawal
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2020-05-01

6.  The endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed euploid blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial comparing clinical results from natural modified cycle and exogenous hormone stimulation with GnRH agonist.

Authors:  Ermanno Greco; Katarzyna Litwicka; Cristiana Arrivi; Maria Teresa Varricchio; Alina Caragia; Alessia Greco; Maria Giulia Minasi; Francesco Fiorentino
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.357

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.