Literature DB >> 23186285

Early results of a European multicentre experience with a new self-anchoring adjustable transobturator system for treatment of stress urinary incontinence in men.

M Raschid Hoda1, Günter Primus, Katja Fischereder, Burkhard Von Heyden, Nasreldin Mohammed, Norbert Schmid, Volker Moll, Amir Hamza, Johannes J Karsch, Clemens Brössner, Paolo Fornara, Wilhelm Bauer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report our experience with a new self-anchoring adjustable transobturator male system (ATOMS®; AMI, Vienna, Austria) for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in men. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 99 men, in a number of centres, were treated for SUI with the new ATOMS® device. The device was implanted in all patients using an outside-in technique by passing the obturator foramen and anchoring the device to the inferior pubic ramus. The titanium port was placed s.c. on the left symphysis region. Adjustments were performed via port access. Postoperative evaluation consisted of physical examination, 24-h pad test, and 24 h-pad count. Preoperatively and at 6-month follow-up, patients completed a validated quality-of-life questionnaire. Two-way ANOVA was used to analyse changes over time. Within-group effects for time were tested using post hoc Dunnett's contrasts of baseline values vs subsequent measurements.
RESULTS: The most common indication was SUI after radical prostatectomy (92.9%). Failure of previous surgeries was present in 34.3% patients and 31.3% patients had undergone secondary radiation. The mean (SD; range) surgery time was 47 (13.8; 29-112) min. Temporary urinary retention occurred in two patients (2%) and transient perineal/scrotal dysaesthesia or pain was reported by 68 patients (68.7%) and resolved after 3-4 weeks of non-opioid analgesics. There were four (4%) cases of wound infection at the site of the titanium port leading to explantation. No urethral or bladder injuries related to the device or erosions occurred. The mean (SD; range) number of adjustments to reach the desired result (dryness, improvement and/or patient satisfaction) was 3.8 (1.3; 1-6). After a mean (SD; range) follow-up time of 17.8 (1.6; 12-33) months, the overall success rate was 92% and the mean pad use decreased from 7.1 to 1.3 pads/24 h (P < 0.001). Overall, 63% were considered dry and 29% were improved.
CONCLUSION: Treatment of male SUI with this self-anchored adjustable system is safe and effective.
© 2012 BJU International.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23186285     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11482.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  26 in total

1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing Adjustable Transobturator Male System (ATOMS) and male Readjustment Mechanical External (REMEEX) system for post-prostatectomy incontinence.

Authors:  Javier C Angulo; Sonia Ruiz; Martín Lozano; Ignacio Arance; Miguel Virseda; David Lora
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Incontinence after radical prostatectomy: Anything new in its management?

Authors:  Romain Caremel; Jacques Corcos
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Review of surgical implant procedures for male incontinence after radical prostatectomy according to IDEAL framework.

Authors:  Dimitri Barski; Holger Gerullis; Thomas Otto
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-05-06

Review 4.  [Incontinence after radical prostatectomy : Male Sling or "best option" first?]

Authors:  J F Gerhard; M S Aragona; R Olianas
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  [Diagnosis and surgical treatment of postprostatectomy stress incontinence: recommendation of the working group Urologische Funktionsdiagnostik und Urologie der Frau].

Authors:  R M Bauer; C Hampel; A Haferkamp; K Höfner; W Hübner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  [Urogynecology II: urinary incontinence in men and women: surgical treatment of urinary incontinence and prolapse].

Authors:  M F Hamann; C M Naumann; S Knüpfer; K P Jünemann; R Bauer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Five-year experience with the adjustable transobturator male system for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: a single-center evaluation.

Authors:  Sandra Mühlstädt; Alexander Friedl; Nasreldin Mohammed; André Schumann; Karl Weigand; Felix Kawan; Christian Göllert; Christin Kahlert; Gerit Theil; Kersten Fischer; Paolo Fornara
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Patient satisfaction with adjustable transobturator male system in the Iberian multicenter study.

Authors:  Javier C Angulo; Ignacio Arance; Antonio Ojea; Manuel Carballo; Andrés Rodríguez; Javier Pereira; Miguel Rebassa; Antoine Teyrouz; Gregorio Escribano; Fernando Teba; Blanca Madurga; Francisco E Martins; Francisco Cruz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  [Modern operative treatment possibilities in male stress urinary incontinence].

Authors:  R M Bauer; A Kretschmer; W Hübner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  [Therapy of persistent or recurrent stress urinary incontinence].

Authors:  A Soave; O Engel; M Rink; M Fisch; R Dahlem
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.