Literature DB >> 23183371

Does flexion of the femoral implant in total knee arthroplasty increase knee flexion: a randomised controlled trial.

Michael Murphy1, Simon Journeaux2, Julie Hides3, Trevor Russell4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Prosthetic and operative modifications in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been proposed to maximise post-operative knee flexion as it is essential in routine functional activities.
METHODS: We performed a double blind randomised controlled trial to compare clinical outcomes of primary cruciate-retaining TKA for osteoarthritis with the femoral component implanted in either 4° flexion in the sagittal plane (F) or in a neutral position (C). The primary outcome of knee flexion and secondary outcomes knee extension, quadriceps strength, WOMAC, SF-12v2, timed stand test, stair climb test and satisfaction were assessed at 1 year. Knee flexion and extension were also assessed intra-operatively. Implant flexion was measured from true lateral radiographs.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine participants (40 knees) were recruited, 20 knees per group. Three subjects from the control group and two from the flexed group were lost to 1 year follow-up but numbers were sufficient to satisfy the sample size calculation. Significant differences were found between the groups in knee flexion (F: 113.6±8.8° pre-operative, 122.4±6.0° intra-operative, 110.2±7.5° 1 year, C: 117.4±11.7°, 117.4±7.6°, 103.5±10.7°. p=0.031) and mental component score of the SF12-v2 (F 53.3±13.2, C 61.1±7.3, p=0.009) but there were no significant differences in other outcomes and patients were equally satisfied.
CONCLUSION: Flexing the femoral implant in this cruciate retaining TKA system provided a significant difference in knee flexion compared to a neutral position. The improvement appears to occur predominantly at surgery and was not associated with a clinical or functional benefit at 1 year. (ACTRN12606000325505). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1; randomised controlled trial.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Implant flexion; Knee flexion; Randomised controlled trial; Total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23183371     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.10.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  9 in total

1.  Morphological evaluation of the sagittal plane femoral load-bearing surface in computer-simulated virtual total knee arthroplasty implantation at different flexion angles.

Authors:  Shichang Chen; Yiming Zeng; Mengning Yan; Bing Yue; Jun Zhang; You Wang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Appropriate sagittal femoral component alignment cannot be ensured by intramedullary alignment rods.

Authors:  Günther Maderbacher; Jens Schaumburger; Clemens Baier; Florian Zeman; Hans-Robert Springorum; Anne-Maria Birkenbach; Joachim Grifka; Armin Keshmiri
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Bone-femoral component interface gap after sagittal mechanical axis alignment is filled with new bone after cementless total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shinichi Kuriyama; Katsufumi Hyakuna; Satoshi Inoue; Yasutsugu Kawai; Yasuyuki Tamaki; Hiromu Ito; Shuichi Matsuda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Is high flexion total knee arthroplasty a rewarding procedure? An updated meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ting Lei; Hu Qian; Long Hua; Guilherme Moreira de Abreu E Silva; Yihe Hu; Pengfei Lei
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Influence of sagittal plane component alignment on kinematics after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joyce Antony; Kevin Tetsworth; Erik Hohmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Flexing and downsizing the femoral component is not detrimental to patellofemoral biomechanics in posterior-referencing cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Marco A Marra; Marta Strzelczak; Petra J C Heesterbeek; Sebastiaan A W van de Groes; Dennis Janssen; Bart F J M Koopman; Nico Verdonschot; Ate B Wymenga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Influence of the femoral entry point for intramedullary alignment in total knee arthroplasty: A computer-aided design approach.

Authors:  Christoph Stotter; Erich Reiter; Werner Schretter; Philippe Reuter; Stefan Nehrer; Thomas Klestil
Journal:  Jt Dis Relat Surg       Date:  2022-07-06

Review 8.  What is the optimal alignment of the tibial and femoral components in knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Kirill Gromov; Mounim Korchi; Morten G Thomsen; Henrik Husted; Anders Troelsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  An innovative three-dimensional method for identifying a proper femoral intramedullary entry point in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lu-Yao Ma; Hong-Yu Wei; Fu-Yin Wan; Wan-Shou Guo; Jin-Hui Ma
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 2.628

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.