Literature DB >> 23182509

Cost-effectiveness of CT colonography.

Cesare Hassan1, Perry J Pickhardt.   

Abstract

Simulation modeling is extensively applied to CT colonography (CTC) to define its long-term efficacy and cost-effectiveness for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. CTC is effective in reducing CRC incidence and mortality (40%-77% and 58%-84%, respectively). Several factors may explain this variability. CTC is cost-effective compared with no screening, indicating that it represents an attractive test noncompliance with the available options. CTC needs to achieve a higher attendance rate or cost less than colonoscopy to be cost-effective relative to colonoscopy. Fortunately, both conditions appear to be achievable if CTC becomes a widely utilized and reimbursed screening tool.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23182509      PMCID: PMC5604859          DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2012.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0033-8389            Impact factor:   2.303


  38 in total

1.  Is virtual colonoscopy a cost-effective option to screen for colorectal cancer?

Authors:  A Sonnenberg; F Delcò; P Bauerfeind
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Extracolonic findings at CT colonography: evaluation of prevalence and cost in a screening population.

Authors:  Thomas M Gluecker; C Daniel Johnson; Lynn A Wilson; Robert L Maccarty; Timothy J Welch; David J Vanness; David A Ahlquist
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; J Richard Choi; Inku Hwang; James A Butler; Michael L Puckett; Hans A Hildebrandt; Roy K Wong; Pamela A Nugent; Pauline A Mysliwiec; William R Schindler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection--systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Cesare Hassan; Steve Halligan; Riccardo Marmo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Esther M Stoop; Margriet C de Haan; Thomas R de Wijkerslooth; Patrick M Bossuyt; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; C Yung Nio; Marc J van de Vijver; Katharina Biermann; Maarten Thomeer; Monique E van Leerdam; Paul Fockens; Jaap Stoker; Ernst J Kuipers; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Frequency and impact of extracolonic findings detected at computed tomographic colonography in a symptomatic population.

Authors:  K Y Khan; T Xiong; I McCafferty; P Riley; T Ismail; R J Lilford; D G Morton
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; J O Chamberlain; M H Robinson; S M Moss; S S Amar; T W Balfour; P D James; C M Mangham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Meredith A Goldwasser; Lawrence F Paszat; Refik Saskin; David R Urbach; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Colorectal neoplasia screening with virtual colonoscopy: when, at what cost, and with what national impact?

Authors:  Uri Ladabaum; Kenneth Song; A Mark Fendrick
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  Computed tomographic colonography to screen for colorectal cancer, extracolonic cancer, and aortic aneurysm: model simulation with cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Cesare Hassan; Perry J Pickhardt; Perry Pickhardt; Andrea Laghi; Daniel H Kim; Daniel Kim; Angelo Zullo; Franco Iafrate; Lorenzo Di Giulio; Sergio Morini
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-04-14
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Screening and Surveillance of Colorectal Cancer Using CT Colonography.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar; Brooks D Cash
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03

Review 2.  Computed tomography colonography in 2014: an update on technique and indications.

Authors:  Andrea Laghi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  CT colonography for population screening: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Colorectal Polyps Missed with Optical Colonoscopy Despite Previous Detection and Localization with CT Colonography.

Authors:  B Dustin Pooler; David H Kim; Jennifer M Weiss; Kristina A Matkowskyj; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  CT colonography for population screening of colorectal cancer: hints from European trials.

Authors:  Lapo Sali; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Medicare cost of colorectal cancer screening: CT colonography vs. optical colonoscopy.

Authors:  Bruce Pyenson; Perry J Pickhardt; Tia Goss Sawhney; Michele Berrios
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-10

7.  Population screening for colorectal cancer by flexible sigmoidoscopy or CT colonography: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial.

Authors:  Daniele Regge; Gabriella Iussich; Carlo Senore; Loredana Correale; Cesare Hassan; Alberto Bert; Stefania Montemezzi; Nereo Segnan
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Computed tomography colonography: a well-known but poorly utilized screening method.

Authors:  Antonio Carlos Maciel; Luciano Carone Maciel
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2014 May-Jun

9.  Computed tomography colonography versus colonoscopy for detection of colorectal cancer: a diagnostic performance study.

Authors:  Junping Sha; Jun Chen; Xuguang Lv; Shaoxin Liu; Ruihong Chen; Zhibing Zhang
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 1.930

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.