PURPOSE: To apply physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling to investigate the consequences of reduction in activity of hepatic and intestinal uptake and efflux transporters by cyclosporine and its metabolite AM1. METHODS: Inhibitory potencies of cyclosporine and AM1 against OATP1B1, OATP1B3 and OATP2B1 were investigated in HEK293 cells +/- pre-incubation. Cyclosporine PBPK model implemented in Matlab was used to assess interaction potential (+/- metabolite) against different processes (uptake, efflux and metabolism) in liver and intestine and to predict quantitatively drug-drug interaction with repaglinide. RESULTS: Cyclosporine and AM1 were potent inhibitors of OATP1B1 and OATP1B3, IC(50) ranging from 0.019-0.093 μM following pre-incubation. Cyclosporine PBPK model predicted the highest interaction potential against liver uptake transporters, with a maximal reduction of >70% in OATP1B1 activity; the effect on hepatic efflux and metabolism was minimal. In contrast, 80-97% of intestinal P-gp and CYP3A4 activity was reduced due to the 50-fold higher cyclosporine enterocytic concentrations relative to unbound hepatic inlet. The inclusion of AM1 resulted in a minor increase in the predicted maximal reduction of OATP1B1/1B3 activity. Good predictability of cyclosporine-repaglinide DDI and the impact of dose staggering are illustrated. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the application of PBPK modeling for quantitative prediction of transporter-mediated DDIs with concomitant consideration of P450 inhibition.
PURPOSE: To apply physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling to investigate the consequences of reduction in activity of hepatic and intestinal uptake and efflux transporters by cyclosporine and its metabolite AM1. METHODS: Inhibitory potencies of cyclosporine and AM1 against OATP1B1, OATP1B3 and OATP2B1 were investigated in HEK293 cells +/- pre-incubation. Cyclosporine PBPK model implemented in Matlab was used to assess interaction potential (+/- metabolite) against different processes (uptake, efflux and metabolism) in liver and intestine and to predict quantitatively drug-drug interaction with repaglinide. RESULTS:Cyclosporine and AM1 were potent inhibitors of OATP1B1 and OATP1B3, IC(50) ranging from 0.019-0.093 μM following pre-incubation. Cyclosporine PBPK model predicted the highest interaction potential against liver uptake transporters, with a maximal reduction of >70% in OATP1B1 activity; the effect on hepatic efflux and metabolism was minimal. In contrast, 80-97% of intestinal P-gp and CYP3A4 activity was reduced due to the 50-fold higher cyclosporine enterocytic concentrations relative to unbound hepatic inlet. The inclusion of AM1 resulted in a minor increase in the predicted maximal reduction of OATP1B1/1B3 activity. Good predictability of cyclosporine-repaglinide DDI and the impact of dose staggering are illustrated. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the application of PBPK modeling for quantitative prediction of transporter-mediated DDIs with concomitant consideration of P450 inhibition.
Authors: C Weber; R Schmitt; H Birnboeck; G Hopfgartner; H Eggers; J Meyer; S van Marle; H W Viischer; J H Jonkman Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Kathleen M Giacomini; Shiew-Mei Huang; Donald J Tweedie; Leslie Z Benet; Kim L R Brouwer; Xiaoyan Chu; Amber Dahlin; Raymond Evers; Volker Fischer; Kathleen M Hillgren; Keith A Hoffmaster; Toshihisa Ishikawa; Dietrich Keppler; Richard B Kim; Caroline A Lee; Mikko Niemi; Joseph W Polli; Yuichi Sugiyama; Peter W Swaan; Joseph A Ware; Stephen H Wright; Sook Wah Yee; Maciej J Zamek-Gliszczynski; Lei Zhang Journal: Nat Rev Drug Discov Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 84.694
Authors: Felix Stader; Gudrun Wuerthwein; Andreas H Groll; Joerg-Janne Vehreschild; Oliver A Cornely; Georg Hempel Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2014-12-19 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: X Chu; K Korzekwa; R Elsby; K Fenner; A Galetin; Y Lai; P Matsson; A Moss; S Nagar; G R Rosania; J P F Bai; J W Polli; Y Sugiyama; K L R Brouwer Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2013-04-10 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: M J Zamek-Gliszczynski; C A Lee; A Poirier; J Bentz; X Chu; H Ellens; T Ishikawa; M Jamei; J C Kalvass; S Nagar; K S Pang; K Korzekwa; P W Swaan; M E Taub; P Zhao; A Galetin Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2013-02-25 Impact factor: 6.875