Literature DB >> 24033787

Combining the 'bottom up' and 'top down' approaches in pharmacokinetic modelling: fitting PBPK models to observed clinical data.

Nikolaos Tsamandouras1, Amin Rostami-Hodjegan, Leon Aarons.   

Abstract

Pharmacokinetic models range from being entirely exploratory and empirical, to semi-mechanistic and ultimately complex physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models. This choice is conditional on the modelling purpose as well as the amount and quality of the available data. The main advantage of PBPK models is that they can be used to extrapolate outside the studied population and experimental conditions. The trade-off for this advantage is a complex system of differential equations with a considerable number of model parameters. When these parameters cannot be informed from in vitro or in silico experiments they are usually optimized with respect to observed clinical data. Parameter estimation in complex models is a challenging task associated with many methodological issues which are discussed here with specific recommendations. Concepts such as structural and practical identifiability are described with regards to PBPK modelling and the value of experimental design and sensitivity analyses is sketched out. Parameter estimation approaches are discussed, while we also highlight the importance of not neglecting the covariance structure between model parameters and the uncertainty and population variability that is associated with them. Finally the possibility of using model order reduction techniques and minimal semi-mechanistic models that retain the physiological-mechanistic nature only in the parts of the model which are relevant to the desired modelling purpose is emphasized. Careful attention to all the above issues allows us to integrate successfully information from in vitro or in silico experiments together with information deriving from observed clinical data and develop mechanistically sound models with clinical relevance.
© 2013 The British Pharmacological Society.

Keywords:  Bayesian analysis; PBPK; identifiability; middle-out approach; parameter estimation; population variability

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24033787      PMCID: PMC4294076          DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  60 in total

1.  A mechanistic pharmacokinetic model to assess modified oral drug bioavailability post bariatric surgery in morbidly obese patients: interplay between CYP3A gut wall metabolism, permeability and dissolution.

Authors:  Adam S Darwich; Devendra Pade; Basil J Ammori; Masoud Jamei; Darren M Ashcroft; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan
Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.765

Review 2.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetics joined with in vitro-in vivo extrapolation of ADME: a marriage under the arch of systems pharmacology.

Authors:  A Rostami-Hodjegan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling: a sound mechanistic basis is needed.

Authors:  L Aarons
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Diazepam pharamacokinetics from preclinical to phase I using a Bayesian population physiologically based pharmacokinetic model with informative prior distributions in WinBUGS.

Authors:  Ivelina Gueorguieva; Leon Aarons; Malcolm Rowland
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 2.745

5.  Optimal design for multivariate response pharmacokinetic models.

Authors:  Ivelina Gueorguieva; Leon Aarons; Kayode Ogungbenro; Karin M Jorga; Trudy Rodgers; Malcolm Rowland
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 2.745

6.  Data-based identifiability analysis of non-linear dynamical models.

Authors:  S Hengl; C Kreutz; J Timmer; T Maiwald
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 7.  Methods for predicting in vivo pharmacokinetics using data from in vitro assays.

Authors:  J Brian Houston; Aleksandra Galetin
Journal:  Curr Drug Metab       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.731

8.  Identifiable pharmacokinetic models: the role of extra inputs and measurements.

Authors:  K R Godfrey; R P Jones; R F Brown
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1980-12

9.  Parameter and structural identifiability concepts and ambiguities: a critical review and analysis.

Authors:  C Cobelli; J J DiStefano
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1980-07

10.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling to predict transporter-mediated clearance and distribution of pravastatin in humans.

Authors:  Takao Watanabe; Hiroyuki Kusuhara; Kazuya Maeda; Yoshihisa Shitara; Yuichi Sugiyama
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 4.030

View more
  82 in total

Review 1.  Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling and Simulation Approaches: A Systematic Review of Published Models, Applications, and Model Verification.

Authors:  Jennifer E Sager; Jingjing Yu; Isabelle Ragueneau-Majlessi; Nina Isoherranen
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.922

2.  Population pharmacokinetic reanalysis of a Diazepam PBPK model: a comparison of Stan and GNU MCSim.

Authors:  Periklis Tsiros; Frederic Y Bois; Aristides Dokoumetzidis; Georgia Tsiliki; Haralambos Sarimveis
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  Pharmacometrics: so much mathematics and why planes achieve their destinations with almost perfect results ….

Authors:  Geoffrey K Isbister; Robert Bies
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  A "middle-out" approach to human pharmacokinetic predictions for OATP substrates using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling.

Authors:  Rui Li; Hugh A Barton; Phillip D Yates; Avijit Ghosh; Angela C Wolford; Keith A Riccardi; Tristan S Maurer
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 2.745

5.  Prediction of drug disposition in diabetic patients by means of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model.

Authors:  Jia Li; Hai-Fang Guo; Can Liu; Zeyu Zhong; Li Liu; Xiao-Dong Liu
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Can Population Pharmacokinetics of Antibiotics be Extrapolated? Implications of External Evaluations.

Authors:  Yu Cheng; Chen-Yu Wang; Zi-Ran Li; Yan Pan; Mao-Bai Liu; Zheng Jiao
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Selection and Qualification of Simplified QSP Models When Using Model Order Reduction Techniques.

Authors:  Chihiro Hasegawa; Stephen B Duffull
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.009

8.  Well-tempered MCMC simulations for population pharmacokinetic models.

Authors:  Frederic Y Bois; Nan-Hung Hsieh; Wang Gao; Weihsueh A Chiu; Brad Reisfeld
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 2.745

9.  Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Macitentan: Prediction of Drug-Drug Interactions.

Authors:  Ruben de Kanter; Patricia N Sidharta; Stéphane Delahaye; Carmela Gnerre; Jerome Segrestaa; Stephan Buchmann; Christopher Kohl; Alexander Treiber
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Toward a robust tool for pharmacokinetic-based personalization of treatment with tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation: A model-based meta-analysis approach.

Authors:  Tom M Nanga; Thao T P Doan; Pierre Marquet; Flora T Musuamba
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.