Literature DB >> 23178808

Post-replicative repair involves separase-dependent removal of the kleisin subunit of cohesin.

Alexandra McAleenan1, Andres Clemente-Blanco, Violeta Cordon-Preciado, Nicholas Sen, Miguel Esteras, Adam Jarmuz, Luis Aragón.   

Abstract

DNA double-strand break repair is critical for cell viability and involves highly coordinated pathways to restore DNA integrity at the lesion. An early event during homology-dependent repair is resection of the break to generate progressively longer 3' single-strand tails that are used to identify suitable templates for repair. Sister chromatids provide near-perfect sequence homology and are therefore the preferred templates during homologous recombination. To provide a bias for the use of sisters as donors, cohesin--the complex that tethers sister chromatids together--is recruited to the break to enforce physical proximity. Here we show that DNA breaks promote dissociation of cohesin loaded during the previous S phase in budding yeast, and that damage-induced dissociation of cohesin requires separase, the protease that dissolves cohesion in anaphase. Moreover, a separase-resistant allele of the gene coding for the α-kleisin subunit of cohesin, Mcd1 (also known as Scc1), reduces double-strand break resection and compromises the efficiency of repair even when loaded during DNA damage. We conclude that post-replicative DNA repair involves cohesin dissociation by separase to promote accessibility to repair factors during the coordinated cellular response to restore DNA integrity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23178808     DOI: 10.1038/nature11630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  19 in total

1.  Sister chromatid gene conversion is a prominent double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian cells.

Authors:  R D Johnson; M Jasin
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-07-03       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  L C Kadyk; L H Hartwell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 and Ku proteins regulate association of Exo1 and Dna2 with DNA breaks.

Authors:  Eun Yong Shim; Woo-Hyun Chung; Matthew L Nicolette; Yu Zhang; Melody Davis; Zhu Zhu; Tanya T Paull; Grzegorz Ira; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Postreplicative formation of cohesion is required for repair and induced by a single DNA break.

Authors:  Lena Ström; Charlotte Karlsson; Hanna Betts Lindroos; Sara Wedahl; Yuki Katou; Katsuhiko Shirahige; Camilla Sjögren
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  A recombination execution checkpoint regulates the choice of homologous recombination pathway during DNA double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Suvi Jain; Neal Sugawara; John Lydeard; Moreshwar Vaze; Nicolas Tanguy Le Gac; James E Haber
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing.

Authors:  Eleni P Mimitou; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-09-21       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The kleisin subunit of cohesin dictates damage-induced cohesion.

Authors:  Jill M Heidinger-Pauli; Elçin Unal; Vincent Guacci; Douglas Koshland
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 8.  Cohesin: a catenase with separate entry and exit gates?

Authors:  Kim Nasmyth
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 28.824

9.  Systematic reduction of cohesin differentially affects chromosome segregation, condensation, and DNA repair.

Authors:  Jill M Heidinger-Pauli; Ozlem Mert; Carol Davenport; Vincent Guacci; Douglas Koshland
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Distinct targets of the Eco1 acetyltransferase modulate cohesion in S phase and in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Jill M Heidinger-Pauli; Elçin Unal; Douglas Koshland
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 17.970

View more
  25 in total

1.  H2A.Z-dependent regulation of cohesin dynamics on chromosome arms.

Authors:  Claudia Tapia-Alveal; Su-Jiun Lin; Aaron Yeoh; Omar J Jabado; Matthew J O'Connell
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Overexpression and constitutive nuclear localization of cohesin protease Separase protein correlates with high incidence of relapse and reduced overall survival in glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Malini Mukherjee; Tiara Byrd; Vita S Brawley; Kevin Bielamowicz; Xiao-Nan Li; Fatima Merchant; Saurabh Maitra; Pavel Sumazin; Greg Fuller; Yvonne Kew; David Sun; Suzanne Z Powell; Nabil Ahmed; Nenggang Zhang; Debananda Pati
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 3.  Cohesin dynamic association to chromatin and interfacing with replication forks in genome integrity maintenance.

Authors:  Sara Villa-Hernández; Rodrigo Bermejo
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 3.886

4.  Degradation of the Separase-cleaved Rec8, a Meiotic Cohesin Subunit, by the N-end Rule Pathway.

Authors:  Yu-Jiao Liu; Chao Liu; ZeNan Chang; Brandon Wadas; Christopher S Brower; Zhen-Hua Song; Zhi-Liang Xu; Yong-Liang Shang; Wei-Xiao Liu; Li-Na Wang; Wen Dong; Alexander Varshavsky; Rong-Gui Hu; Wei Li
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Role of CTCF in DNA damage response.

Authors:  Vinay Singh Tanwar; Cynthia C Jose; Suresh Cuddapah
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 5.657

Review 6.  Structure and Function of the Separase-Securin Complex.

Authors:  Shukun Luo; Liang Tong
Journal:  Subcell Biochem       Date:  2021

7.  The sister chromatid cohesion pathway suppresses multiple chromosome gain and chromosome amplification.

Authors:  Shay Covo; Christopher M Puccia; Juan Lucas Argueso; Dmitry A Gordenin; Michael A Resnick
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Polymer perspective of genome mobilization.

Authors:  Colleen J Lawrimore; Josh Lawrimore; Yunyan He; Sergio Chavez; Kerry Bloom
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.433

9.  Local activation of mammalian separase in interphase promotes double-strand break repair and prevents oncogenic transformation.

Authors:  Susanne Hellmuth; Cristina Gutiérrez-Caballero; Elena Llano; Alberto M Pendás; Olaf Stemmann
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  A role for the budding yeast separase, Esp1, in Ty1 element retrotransposition.

Authors:  Krystina L Ho; Lina Ma; Stephanie Cheung; Savrina Manhas; Nancy Fang; Kaiqian Wang; Barry Young; Christopher Loewen; Thibault Mayor; Vivien Measday
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.