Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 PEDro's bias: summary quality scores should not be used in meta-analysis.

Literature DB >> 23177896

PEDro's bias: summary quality scores should not be used in meta-analysis.

Bruno R da Costa¹, Roger Hilfiker, Matthias Egger.

Abstract

Mesh：

Year: 2013 PMID： 23177896 DOI： 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.08.003

Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Epidemiol ISSN： 0895-4356 Impact factor: 6.437

Keyword Cloud
Cited

× No keyword cloud information.

21 in total

Review 1. Evidence synthesis for medical decision making and the appropriate use of quality scores.

Authors: Suhail A R Doi
Journal: Clin Med Res Date: 2014-01-10

Review 2. Non-pharmacological cancer pain interventions in populations with social disparities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors: Anna Santos Salas; Jorge Fuentes Contreras; Susan Armijo-Olivo; Humam Saltaji; Sharon Watanabe; Thane Chambers; Lori Walter; Greta G Cummings
Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3. Cognitive Remediation as an Adjunct Treatment for Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review.

Authors: Talia Nardo; Jennifer Batchelor; Jamie Berry; Heather Francis; Deyyan Jafar; Thomas Borchard
Journal: Neuropsychol Rev Date: 2021-04-19 Impact factor: 7.444

Review 4. The impact of physician-nurse task shifting in primary care on the course of disease: a systematic review.

Authors: Nahara A Martínez-González; Ryan Tandjung; Sima Djalali; Thomas Rosemann
Journal: Hum Resour Health Date: 2015-07-07

5. PEDro or Cochrane to Assess the Quality of Clinical Trials? A Meta-Epidemiological Study.

Authors: Susan Armijo-Olivo; Bruno R da Costa; Greta G Cummings; Christine Ha; Jorge Fuentes; Humam Saltaji; Matthias Egger
Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-10 Impact factor: 3.240

6. Quality assessment of observational studies in a drug-safety systematic review, comparison of two tools: the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the RTI item bank.

Authors: Andrea V Margulis; Manel Pladevall; Nuria Riera-Guardia; Cristina Varas-Lorenzo; Lorna Hazell; Nancy D Berkman; Meera Viswanathan; Susana Perez-Gutthann
Journal: Clin Epidemiol Date: 2014-10-10 Impact factor: 4.790

PEDro's bias: summary quality scores should not be used in meta-analysis.

Review 1. Evidence synthesis for medical decision making and the appropriate use of quality scores.

Review 2. Non-pharmacological cancer pain interventions in populations with social disparities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Review 3. Cognitive Remediation as an Adjunct Treatment for Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review.

Review 4. The impact of physician-nurse task shifting in primary care on the course of disease: a systematic review.

5. PEDro or Cochrane to Assess the Quality of Clinical Trials? A Meta-Epidemiological Study.

6. Quality assessment of observational studies in a drug-safety systematic review, comparison of two tools: the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the RTI item bank.

Review 7. XRCC1 and OGG1 Gene Polymorphisms and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review of Literature.

Review 8. Systemic Literature Review of the Use of Virtual Reality for Rehabilitation in Parkinson Disease.

Review 9. Integrated care programmes for adults with chronic conditions: a meta-review.

10. Effect of standardized training on the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: a study protocol.