Literature DB >> 23175971

Determination of ash in animal feed: AOAC official method 942.05 revisited.

Nancy Thiex1, Lawrence Novotny, Andy Crawford.   

Abstract

AOAC Official Method 942.05, Ash in Animal Feed, has been applied in feed laboratories since its publication in the Official Methods of Analysis in 1942. It is a routine test with renewed interest due to the incorporation of "ash values" into modern equations for the estimation of energy content of dairy feed, beef feed, and pet food. As with other empirical methods, results obtained are a function of the test conditions. For this method, the critical conditions are the ignition time, ignition temperature, and any other furnace or weighing conditions. Complete ignition can be observed by the absence of black color (due to residual carbonaceous material) in the ash residue. To investigate performance of AOAC 942.05, 15 samples were chosen to be representative of a wide range of feed materials. These materials were tested at the conditions of AOAC 942.05 (ignition at 600 degrees C for 2 h) and similar or more rigorous conditions. The additional conditions investigated included: 600 degrees C for 4 h; 600 degrees C for 2 h, cool, and ignite 2 additional h; 600 degrees C for 2 h, cool, wet, dry, and ignite 2 additional h; 550 degrees C for 6 h; 550 degrees C for 3 h, cool, and ignite 3 additional h; and 550 degrees C for 3 h, cool, wet, dry, ignite 3 additional h. Results for all other conditions investigated were found to be significantly different from the current AOAC Method 942.05. All ignition conditions were significantly different from each other except two: 550 degrees C for 3 h, cool, ignite 3 additional h; and 550 degrees C for 3 h, cool, wet, dry, and ignite 3 additional h. Recommendations for modification to AOAC Official Method 942.05 are suggested based on statistical analysis of the data and a review of the literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23175971     DOI: 10.5740/jaoacint.12-129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AOAC Int        ISSN: 1060-3271            Impact factor:   1.913


  16 in total

1.  Effect of increasing dietary energy density during late gestation and lactation on sow performance, piglet vitality, and lifetime growth of offspring.

Authors:  Hazel B Rooney; Keelin O'driscoll; John V O'doherty; Peadar G Lawlor
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Blood and faecal biomarkers to assess dietary energy, protein and amino acid efficiency of utilization by growing and finishing pigs.

Authors:  Jordi Camp Montoro; David Solà-Oriol; Ramon Muns; Josep Gasa; Núria Llanes; Edgar Garcia Manzanilla
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2022-07-04

3.  Yield and quality properties of silage maize and their influencing factors in China.

Authors:  Mengying Zhao; Yinping Feng; Yue Shi; Haihua Shen; Huifeng Hu; Yongkai Luo; Longchao Xu; Jie Kang; Aijun Xing; Shaopeng Wang; Jingyun Fang
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 10.372

4.  Effect of fermented corn by-products on production performance, blood biochemistry, and egg quality indices of laying hens.

Authors:  Ru Yang; Anam Khalid; Fatima Khalid; Miao Ye; Yang Li; Kai Zhan; Yan Li; Wei Liu; Zaigui Wang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 3.338

5.  Combined signature of rumen microbiome and metabolome in dairy cows with different feed intake levels.

Authors:  Yeqing Q Li; Yumeng M Xi; Zedong D Wang; Hanfang F Zeng; Zhaoyu Han
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Citrus limon Peel Powder Reduces Intestinal Barrier Defects and Inflammation in a Colitic Murine Experimental Model.

Authors:  Nguyen Thi Thanh Tinh; Gertrude Cynthia Sitolo; Yoshinari Yamamoto; Takuya Suzuki
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-01-25

7.  Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Capacity in Pearling Fractions of Hulled, Partially Hull-Less and Hull-Less Food Barley Genotypes.

Authors:  Mariona Martínez-Subirà; María-Paz Romero; Alba Macià; Eva Puig; Ignacio Romagosa; Marian Moralejo
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-03-09

8.  Comprehensive Evaluation of Late Season Peach Varieties (Prunus persica L.): Fruit Nutritional Quality and Phytochemicals.

Authors:  Dasha Mihaylova; Aneta Popova; Ivelina Desseva; Ivan Manolov; Nadezhda Petkova; Radka Vrancheva; Alexander Peltekov; Anton Slavov; Argir Zhivondov
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.411

9.  Evaluating the Potential of the Defatted By-Product of Aurantiochytrium sp. Industrial Cultivation as a Functional Food.

Authors:  João Reboleira; Rafael Félix; Carina Félix; Marcelo M R de Melo; Carlos M Silva; Jorge A Saraiva; Narcisa M Bandarra; Bárbara Teixeira; Rogério Mendes; Maria C Paulo; Joana Coutinho; Marco F L Lemos
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-12-09

10.  Herbivorous fish (Medialuna ancietae) as a sustainable alternative for nutrition security in Northern Chile.

Authors:  Ivonne Lozano-Muñoz; Giorgio Castellaro; German Bueno; Jurij Wacyk
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.