Literature DB >> 35122623

Yield and quality properties of silage maize and their influencing factors in China.

Mengying Zhao1,2, Yinping Feng1,2, Yue Shi1,2, Haihua Shen1,2, Huifeng Hu1, Yongkai Luo1, Longchao Xu1, Jie Kang1,2, Aijun Xing1,2, Shaopeng Wang3, Jingyun Fang4,5.   

Abstract

Silage maize (Zea mays L.) is one of the most important forages in the world, and its yield and quality properties are critical parameters for livestock production and assessment of forage values. However, relationships between its yield and quality properties and the controlling factors are not well documented. In this study, we collected 5,663 observations from 196 publications across the country to identify the relationships between yield and quality properties of silage maize and to assess the impact of management practices and climatic factors on its yield and quality in China. The average dry matter yield of silage maize was (19.98±6.93) Mg ha-1, and the average value of crude protein, ether extract, crude ash, crude fiber, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber, nitrogen-free extract, and relative feed value was 7.86%±1.71%, 2.53%±1.01%, 5.05%±1.66%, 23.97%±6.34%, 27.62%±7.12%, 51.60%±9.85%, 59.68%±7.72%, and 131.17±31.49, respectively. In general, its nutritive value decreased as its yield increased. Increasing planting density could increase the yield but inhibit the nutritive values, while increasing fertilization could benefit the nutritive values. Geographically, the yield increased and the nutritive value decreased from warm (south) to cold (north) regions. The length of growth duration was a major controlling factor for the patterns of these properties. Our findings provide insights for police-makers to make strategy for achieving high yield and good quality of silage maize and help local people to implement better management practices.
© 2022. Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  climatic factors; management practices; quality; silage maize; yield

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35122623     DOI: 10.1007/s11427-020-2023-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci China Life Sci        ISSN: 1674-7305            Impact factor:   10.372


  19 in total

1.  Effect of corn silage hybrid on dry matter yield, nutrient composition, in vitro digestion, intake by dairy heifers, and milk production by dairy cows.

Authors:  C S Ballard; E D Thomas; D S Tsang; P Mandebvu; C J Sniffen; M I Endres; M P Carter
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across 753 terrestrial plant species in China.

Authors:  Wenxuan Han; Jingyun Fang; Dali Guo; Yan Zhang
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  Mycoflora and multimycotoxin detection in corn silage: experimental study.

Authors:  David Garon; Estelle Richard; Lucile Sage; Valerie Bouchart; Didier Pottier; Pierre Lebailly
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 5.279

4.  Effect of planting density on nutritional quality of green-chopped corn for silage.

Authors:  Gonzalo Ferreira; Mauro Alfonso; Sebastián Depino; Esteban Alessandri
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 5.  Nutritive value of maize silage in relation to dairy cow performance and milk quality.

Authors:  Nazir A Khan; Peiqiang Yu; Mubarak Ali; John W Cone; Wouter H Hendriks
Journal:  J Sci Food Agric       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.638

6.  China's intercropping leads to higher grain yield gains.

Authors:  Wen-Feng Cong
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 6.038

7.  Effect of corn silage harvest maturity and concentrate type on milk fatty acid composition of dairy cows.

Authors:  N A Khan; T A Tewoldebrhan; R L G Zom; J W Cone; W H Hendriks
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.034

8.  Producing more grain with lower environmental costs.

Authors:  Xinping Chen; Zhenling Cui; Mingsheng Fan; Peter Vitousek; Ming Zhao; Wenqi Ma; Zhenlin Wang; Weijian Zhang; Xiaoyuan Yan; Jianchang Yang; Xiping Deng; Qiang Gao; Qiang Zhang; Shiwei Guo; Jun Ren; Shiqing Li; Youliang Ye; Zhaohui Wang; Jianliang Huang; Qiyuan Tang; Yixiang Sun; Xianlong Peng; Jiwang Zhang; Mingrong He; Yunji Zhu; Jiquan Xue; Guiliang Wang; Liang Wu; Ning An; Liangquan Wu; Lin Ma; Weifeng Zhang; Fusuo Zhang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Phylogenetic and growth form variation in the scaling of nitrogen and phosphorus in the seed plants.

Authors:  Andrew J Kerkhoff; William F Fagan; James J Elser; Brian J Enquist
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Impact of organic and inorganic fertilizers on the yield and quality of silage corn intercropped with soybean.

Authors:  Ali Baghdadi; Ridzwan A Halim; Ali Ghasemzadeh; Mohd Fauzi Ramlan; Siti Zaharah Sakimin
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 2.984

View more
  1 in total

1.  Replacement of Maize Silage and Soyabean Meal with Mulberry Silage in the Diet of Hu Lambs on Growth, Gastrointestinal Tissue Morphology, Rumen Fermentation Parameters and Microbial Diversity.

Authors:  Haoqi Han; Liyang Zhang; Yuan Shang; Mingyan Wang; Clive J C Phillips; Yao Wang; Chuanyou Su; Hongxia Lian; Tong Fu; Tengyun Gao
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 3.231

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.