Literature DB >> 23175567

Optimal Nonbipartite Matching and Its Statistical Applications.

Bo Lu1, Robert Greevy, Xinyi Xu, Cole Beck.   

Abstract

Matching is a powerful statistical tool in design and analysis. Conventional two-group, or bipartite, matching has been widely used in practice. However, its utility is limited to simpler designs. In contrast, nonbipartite matching is not limited to the two-group case, handling multiparty matching situations. It can be used to find the set of matches that minimize the sum of distances based on a given distance matrix. It brings greater flexibility to the matching design, such as multigroup comparisons. Thanks to improvements in computing power and freely available algorithms to solve nonbipartite problems, the cost in terms of computation time and complexity is low. This article reviews the optimal nonbipartite matching algorithm and its statistical applications, including observational studies with complex designs and an exact distribution-free test comparing two multivariate distributions. We also introduce an R package that performs optimal nonbipartite matching. We present an easily accessible web application to make nonbipartite matching freely available to general researchers.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23175567      PMCID: PMC3501247          DOI: 10.1198/tast.2011.08294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Stat        ISSN: 0003-1305            Impact factor:   8.710


  9 in total

1.  Substantial gains in bias reduction from matching with a variable number of controls.

Authors:  K Ming; P R Rosenbaum
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Optimal multivariate matching before randomization.

Authors:  Robert Greevy; Bo Lu; Jeffrey H Silber; Paul Rosenbaum
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Propensity score matching with time-dependent covariates.

Authors:  Bo Lu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Time to send the preemie home? Additional maturity at discharge and subsequent health care costs and outcomes.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Silber; Scott A Lorch; Paul R Rosenbaum; Barbara Medoff-Cooper; Susan Bakewell-Sachs; Andrea Millman; Lanyu Mi; Orit Even-Shoshan; Gabriel J Escobar
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  The essential role of balance tests in propensity-matched observational studies: comments on 'A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine.

Authors:  B B Hansen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Software for optimal matching in observational studies.

Authors:  E J Bergstralh; J L Kosanke; S J Jacobsen
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Matching With Doses in an Observational Study of a Media Campaign Against Drug Abuse.

Authors:  Bo Lu; Elaine Zanutto; Robert Hornik; Paul R Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.033

8.  ERROR-FREE MILESTONES IN ERROR PRONE MEASUREMENTS.

Authors:  Dylan S Small; Paul R Rosenbaum
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.083

9.  The influence of in-pregnancy smoking cessation programmes on partner quitting and women's social support mobilization: a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN89131885].

Authors:  Paul Aveyard; Terry Lawrence; Olga Evans; K K Cheng
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 3.295

  9 in total
  33 in total

1.  Adaptive pre-specification in randomized trials with and without pair-matching.

Authors:  Laura B Balzer; Mark J van der Laan; Maya L Petersen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Optimal matching with minimal deviation from fine balance in a study of obesity and surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Dan Yang; Dylan S Small; Jeffrey H Silber; Paul R Rosenbaum
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  The role of matching when adjusting for baseline differences in the outcome variable of comparative effectiveness studies.

Authors:  Carlos G Grijalva; Christianne L Roumie; Harvey J Murff; Adriana M Hung; Cole Beck; Xulei Liu; Marie R Griffin; Robert A Greevy
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.744

4.  Large, Sparse Optimal Matching with Refined Covariate Balance in an Observational Study of the Health Outcomes Produced by New Surgeons.

Authors:  Samuel D Pimentel; Rachel R Kelz; Jeffrey H Silber; Paul R Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 5.033

5.  Propensity score matching for treatment delay effects with observational survival data.

Authors:  Erinn M Hade; Giovanni Nattino; Heather A Frey; Bo Lu
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  Targeted estimation and inference for the sample average treatment effect in trials with and without pair-matching.

Authors:  Laura B Balzer; Maya L Petersen; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  A novel approach for propensity score matching and stratification for multiple treatments: Application to an electronic health record-derived study.

Authors:  Derek W Brown; Stacia M DeSantis; Thomas J Greene; Vahed Maroufy; Ashraf Yaseen; Hulin Wu; George Williams; Michael D Swartz
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  A Behavior-Based Intervention That Prevents Sexual Assault: the Results of a Matched-Pairs, Cluster-Randomized Study in Nairobi, Kenya.

Authors:  Michael Baiocchi; Benjamin Omondi; Nickson Langat; Derek B Boothroyd; Jake Sinclair; Lee Pavia; Munyae Mulinge; Oscar Githua; Neville H Golden; Clea Sarnquist
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2017-10

9.  Mortality after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Richard M Hoffman; Tatsuki Koyama; Kang-Hsien Fan; Peter C Albertsen; Michael J Barry; Michael Goodman; Ann S Hamilton; Arnold L Potosky; Janet L Stanford; Antoinette M Stroup; David F Penson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Evaluating long-term effects of a psychiatric treatment using instrumental variable and matching approaches.

Authors:  Bo Lu; Sue Marcus
Journal:  Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol       Date:  2012-10-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.