Literature DB >> 31571522

Propensity score matching for treatment delay effects with observational survival data.

Erinn M Hade1,2,3, Giovanni Nattino1, Heather A Frey3, Bo Lu1.   

Abstract

In observational studies with a survival outcome, treatment initiation may be time dependent, which is likely to be affected by both time-invariant and time-varying covariates. In situations where the treatment is necessary for the study population, all or most subjects may be exposed to the treatment sooner or later. In this scenario, the causal effect of interest is the delay in treatment reception. A simple comparison of those receiving treatment early vs. those receiving treatment late might not be appropriate, as the timing of the treatment reception is not randomized. Extending Lu's matching design with time-varying covariates, we propose a propensity score matching strategy to estimate the treatment delay effect. The goal is to balance the covariate distribution between on-time treatment and delayed treatment groups at each time point using risk set matching. Our simulation study shows that, in the presence of treatment delay effects, the matching-based analyses clearly outperform the conventional regression analysis using the naive Cox proportional hazards model. We apply this method to study the treatment delay effect of 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17P) for patients with recurrent preterm birth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cox proportional hazards model; Treatment delay effect; covariate balance; risk set matching; time-varying covariate

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31571522      PMCID: PMC7885462          DOI: 10.1177/0962280219877908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  15 in total

1.  Causal inference on the difference of the restricted mean lifetime between two groups.

Authors:  P Y Chen; A A Tsiatis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Marginal structural models to estimate the causal effect of zidovudine on the survival of HIV-positive men.

Authors:  M A Hernán; B Brumback; J M Robins
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Propensity score matching with time-dependent covariates.

Authors:  Bo Lu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Practice bulletin no. 130: prediction and prevention of preterm birth.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Testing causal effects in observational survival data using propensity score matching design.

Authors:  Bo Lu; Dingjiao Cai; Xingwei Tong
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Matching With Doses in an Observational Study of a Media Campaign Against Drug Abuse.

Authors:  Bo Lu; Elaine Zanutto; Robert Hornik; Paul R Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate.

Authors:  Paul J Meis; Mark Klebanoff; Elizabeth Thom; Mitchell P Dombrowski; Baha Sibai; Atef H Moawad; Catherine Y Spong; John C Hauth; Menachem Miodovnik; Michael W Varner; Kenneth J Leveno; Steve N Caritis; Jay D Iams; Ronald J Wapner; Deborah Conway; Mary J O'Sullivan; Marshall Carpenter; Brian Mercer; Susan M Ramin; John M Thorp; Alan M Peaceman; Steven Gabbe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Gestational age at initiation of 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone caproate and recurrent preterm birth.

Authors:  Angela Ning; Catherine J Vladutiu; Sarah K Dotters-Katz; William H Goodnight; Tracy A Manuck
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models with time-varying covariates.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.