PURPOSE: To compare pulmonary vein and left atrial anatomy using three-dimensional free-breathing whole-heart magnetic resonance imaging (MR) at 3 Tesla (T) and multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three subjects (19 male, age 49 ± 12 years) underwent free-breathing 3T MR and contrast-enhanced MDCT during inspiratory breath hold. Pulmonary vein parameters (ostial areas, diameters, angles) were measured. RESULTS: All pulmonary veins and anomalies were identified by 3T MR and by MDCT. The right-sided pulmonary veins were directed more posteriorly, the right superior pulmonary vein more inferiorly, and the right inferior pulmonary vein more superiorly by 3T MR when compared with MDCT. The cross-sectional area, perimeters and minimum diameters of right-sided pulmonary vein ostia were significantly larger by MR, as were the maximum diameters of right and left inferior pulmonary veins. There were no significant differences between techniques in distance to first pulmonary vein branch. CONCLUSION: Pulmonary vein measurements demonstrated significant differences in angulations and dimensions when 3T MR is compared with MDCT. These differences likely represent hemodynamic and respiratory variation during free-breathing with MR versus breath-holding with MDCT. MR imaging at 3T during free-breathing offers an alternate method to define pulmonary vein and left atrial anatomy without exposure to radiation.
PURPOSE: To compare pulmonary vein and left atrial anatomy using three-dimensional free-breathing whole-heart magnetic resonance imaging (MR) at 3 Tesla (T) and multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three subjects (19 male, age 49 ± 12 years) underwent free-breathing 3T MR and contrast-enhanced MDCT during inspiratory breath hold. Pulmonary vein parameters (ostial areas, diameters, angles) were measured. RESULTS: All pulmonary veins and anomalies were identified by 3T MR and by MDCT. The right-sided pulmonary veins were directed more posteriorly, the right superior pulmonary vein more inferiorly, and the right inferior pulmonary vein more superiorly by 3T MR when compared with MDCT. The cross-sectional area, perimeters and minimum diameters of right-sided pulmonary vein ostia were significantly larger by MR, as were the maximum diameters of right and left inferior pulmonary veins. There were no significant differences between techniques in distance to first pulmonary vein branch. CONCLUSION:Pulmonary vein measurements demonstrated significant differences in angulations and dimensions when 3T MR is compared with MDCT. These differences likely represent hemodynamic and respiratory variation during free-breathing with MR versus breath-holding with MDCT. MR imaging at 3T during free-breathing offers an alternate method to define pulmonary vein and left atrial anatomy without exposure to radiation.
Authors: Thomas H Hauser; Susan B Yeon; Seth McClennen; George Katsimaglis; Kraig V Kissinger; Mark E Josephson; Neil M Rofsky; Warren J Manning Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2004 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Roy Beinart; Rajesh Kabra; Kevin E Heist; Dan Blendea; Conor D Barrett; Stephan B Danik; Ryan Collins; Jeremy N Ruskin; Moussa Mansour Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2011-05-24 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Ritsushi Kato; Lars Lickfett; Glenn Meininger; Timm Dickfeld; Richard Wu; George Juang; Piamsook Angkeow; Jennifer LaCorte; David Bluemke; Ronald Berger; Henry R Halperin; Hugh Calkins Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-04-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Hung-Fat Tse; Sven Reek; Carl Timmermans; Kathy Lai-Fun Lee; J Christoph Geller; Luz-Maria Rodriguez; Benoit Ghaye; Gregory M Ayers; Harry J G M Crijns; Helmut U Klein; Chu-Pak Lau Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-08-20 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Fred H M Wittkampf; Evert-Jan Vonken; Richard Derksen; Peter Loh; Birgitta Velthuis; Eric F D Wever; Lucas V A Boersma; Benno J Rensing; Maarten-Jan Cramer Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-01-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Johannes Siebermair; Eugene G Kholmovski; Douglas Sheffer; Joyce Schroeder; Leif Jensen; Mobin Kheirkhahan; Alex A Baher; Majd M Ibrahim; Theresa Reiter; Tienush Rassaf; Reza Wakili; Nassir F Marrouche; Christopher J McGann; Brent D Wilson Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 3.629
Authors: John D Groarke; Alfonso H Waller; Tomas S Vita; Gregory F Michaud; Marcelo F Di Carli; Ron Blankstein; Raymond Y Kwong; Michael Steigner Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2014-06-19 Impact factor: 5.364