Literature DB >> 23171987

[Evaluation of 10 years experience with endo-exo femur prostheses - background, data and results].

H H Aschoff1, D L Juhnke.   

Abstract

Between 1999 and 2011 the Endo-Exo femur prosthesis has been applied to 54 patients. This comparatively new method for patient rehabilitation after upper leg amputation includes a two-step surgical procedure. The first step is an operation where the endomodule of the stem prosthesis is implanted in the bone via a press-fit technique. Then the soft tissue coat is closed to give the bone enough time for a secure osseointegration of the prosthesis. About six weeks later a stoma is cut out and the adapter for the exo-part is connected. The prosthesis is therefore intramedullary anchored and percutaneously penetrating the skin. A critical examination of this procedure has to put its main attention to the latent danger of an ascending, intramedullary infection. This may arise from the skin-penetrating stoma region at the distal stump. All data derived from patients operated in Lübeck, Germany have been evaluated focusing on reasons for objectionable operative procedures and their resulting terms of treatment. The evaluation shows that the initially high rate of stoma-associated infections of the soft tissue coat could be dramatically reduced through a change of design of the skin-penetrating parts. In between January 2009 and December 2011 (altogether 24 implants/23 patients) no operative revisions had to be undertaken because of infections of the stoma. Next to this there are more characteristics conditionally caused by the implant - like fractures of the affected extremity and other complications - presented in terms of cause-related case histories. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23171987     DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1327932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall        ISSN: 1864-6697            Impact factor:   0.923


  12 in total

1.  An animal model to evaluate skin-implant-bone integration and gait with a prosthesis directly attached to the residual limb.

Authors:  Brad J Farrell; Boris I Prilutsky; Robert S Kistenberg; John F Dalton; Mark Pitkin
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  [Endo-exo prostheses following limb-amputation].

Authors:  D-L Juhnke; H-H Aschoff
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Two-stage implantation of the skin- and bone-integrated pylon seeded with autologous fibroblasts induced into osteoblast differentiation for direct skeletal attachment of limb prostheses.

Authors:  Maxim A Shevtsov; Oleg V Galibin; Nataliya M Yudintceva; Miralda I Blinova; George P Pinaev; Anna A Ivanova; Olga N Savchenko; Dmitriy N Suslov; Igor L Potokin; Emil Pitkin; Grigory Raykhtsaum; Mark R Pitkin
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 4.  [The endo-exo prosthesis treatment concept : Improvement in quality of life after limb amputation].

Authors:  T Hoffmeister; F Schwarze; H H Aschoff
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 5.  The Compress® transcutaneous implant for rehabilitation following limb amputation.

Authors:  R L McGough; M A Goodman; R L Randall; J A Forsberg; B K Potter; B Lindsey
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 6.  [Functional rehabilitation after transfemoral amputation : Shaft prosthesis or endo-exo prosthesis?]

Authors:  Katherina Richter; Katharina Krause; Robert Rotter; Dagmar-C Fischer; Horst-H Aschoff; Thomas Mittlmeier
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 7.  Design features of implants for direct skeletal attachment of limb prostheses.

Authors:  M Pitkin
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 8.  [Transcutaneous osseointegrated prosthetic systems after major amputation of the lower extremity : A retrospective 3-year analysis].

Authors:  Marcus Örgel; Alexander Ranker; Afif Harb; Christian Krettek; Horst-Heinrich Aschoff
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Management, outcome, and novel classification system of periprosthetic fractures in patients with transcutaneous osseointegrated prosthetic systems (TOPS)-a retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  Marcus Örgel; Maximilian Petri; Alexander Ranker; Nils Wirries; Tilman Graulich; Christian Krettek; Marcel Winkelmann; Horst-Heinrich Aschoff
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 2.928

10.  Complications of bone-anchored prostheses for individuals with an extremity amputation: A systematic review.

Authors:  Robin Atallah; Ruud A Leijendekkers; Thomas J Hoogeboom; Jan Paul Frölke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.