Literature DB >> 28470463

[The endo-exo prosthesis treatment concept : Improvement in quality of life after limb amputation].

T Hoffmeister1, F Schwarze1, H H Aschoff2,3.   

Abstract

Osseointegrated, percutaneous implants as the force bearer for exoprosthetics after limb amputation have been used in individual cases for clinical rehabilitation of amputees during the past years. Most experience in this field in Germany has been accumulated at the Sana Klinik in Lübeck with the so-called endo-exo prosthesis (EEP) system. The two-step implantation procedure can now be considered as reliable. Following a well-documented learning curve initial soft tissue problems concerning the cutaneous stoma can now be regarded as exceptions. The retrospective examination of the results concerning by now more than 100 patients provided with an endo-exo femoral prosthesis (EEFP) showed a very satisfying outcome concerning objective as well as subjective values, such as duration of daily use and wearing comfort of the exoprosthesis. Regaining the ability of osseoperception due to the intraosseous fixation is described by the patients as a great advantage. The step from a socket prosthesis to an EEP is felt to be a big increase in quality of life by nearly all patients included into the follow-up. Nearly all of the patients questioned would choose an endo-exo prosthesis again. Meanwhile, the success of the EEP resulted in the broadening of indications from above-knee amputations to transtibial as well as transhumeral amputations. The results are likewise encouraging. The use of EEP for the upper limbs leads to substantial improvement in the range of motion of the shoulder joint with the intramedullary anchored percutaneous implant. Furthermore, new pathbreaking possibilities in the fixation of myoelectrically controlled arm prostheses may arise from the EEP technique.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extended indications; Limb amputation; Myoelectric; Osseointegration; Osseoperception

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28470463     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-017-0350-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  7 in total

1.  Fifteen years of experience with Integral-Leg-Prosthesis: Cohort study of artificial limb attachment system.

Authors:  Dora-Lisa Juhnke; James P Beck; Sujee Jeyapalina; Horst H Aschoff
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2015

2.  [Endo-exo prostheses following limb-amputation].

Authors:  D-L Juhnke; H-H Aschoff
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period.

Authors:  P I Brånemark; B O Hansson; R Adell; U Breine; J Lindström; O Hallén; A Ohman
Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl       Date:  1977

4.  History and philosophy of attachment of prostheses to the musculo-skeletal system and of passage through the skin with inert materials.

Authors:  E F Murphy
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1973

5.  [Implantation of the endo-exo femur prosthesis to improve the mobility of amputees].

Authors:  H H Aschoff; A Clausen; K Tsoumpris; T Hoffmeister
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 6.  [Endo-exo prostheses : Osseointegrated percutaneously channeled implants for rehabilitation after limb amputation].

Authors:  H-H Aschoff; D-L Juhnke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  [Evaluation of 10 years experience with endo-exo femur prostheses - background, data and results].

Authors:  H H Aschoff; D L Juhnke
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 0.923

  7 in total
  7 in total

1.  Comparison of functional outcome and patient satisfaction between patients with socket prosthesis and patients treated with transcutaneous osseointegrated prosthetic systems (TOPS) after transfemoral amputation.

Authors:  Marcel Winkelmann; Alexander Ranker; Marcus Örgel; Frederik Schwarze; Tilman Graulich; Christian Krettek; Friederike Weidemann; Horst-Heinrich Aschoff
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 2.  Biomechanical Characterisation of Bone-anchored Implant Systems for Amputation Limb Prostheses: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alexander Thesleff; Rickard Brånemark; Bo Håkansson; Max Ortiz-Catalan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Complications of bone-anchored prostheses for individuals with an extremity amputation: A systematic review.

Authors:  Robin Atallah; Ruud A Leijendekkers; Thomas J Hoogeboom; Jan Paul Frölke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Unexpected positive intraoperative cultures (UPIC) at index osseointegration do not lead to increased postoperative infectious events.

Authors:  Jason S Hoellwarth; Taylor J Reif; Michael W Henry; Andy O Miller; Austin C Kaidi; S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2022-07-18

5.  Osseoperception in transcutaneous osseointegrated prosthetic systems (TOPS) after transfemoral amputation: a prospective study.

Authors:  Marcus Örgel; Mohamed Elareibi; Alexander Ranker; Marcel Winkelmann; Tilman Graulich; Christian Krettek; Claudia Neunaber; Horst-Heinrich Aschoff
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Variation in bone response to the placement of percutaneous osseointegrated endoprostheses: A 24-month follow-up in sheep.

Authors:  Sujee Jeyapalina; James Peter Beck; Alex Drew; Roy D Bloebaum; Kent N Bachus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Transtibial Osseointegration for Patients with Peripheral Vascular Disease: A Case Series of 6 Patients with Minimum 3-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Muhammad Adeel Akhtar; Jason Shih Hoellwarth; Shakib Al-Jawazneh; William Lu; Claudia Roberts; Munjed Al Muderis
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-06-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.