Literature DB >> 23169447

Guidelines for reporting and using prediction tools for genetic variation analysis.

Mauno Vihinen1.   

Abstract

Computational prediction methods are widely used for the analysis of human genome sequence variants and their effects on gene/protein function, splice site aberration, pathogenicity, and disease risk. New methods are frequently developed. We believe that guidelines are essential for those writing articles about new prediction methods, as well as for those applying these tools in their research, so that the necessary details are reported. This will enable readers to gain the full picture of technical information, performance, and interpretation of results, and to facilitate comparisons of related methods. Here, we provide instructions on how to describe new methods, report datasets, and assess the performance of predictive tools. We also discuss what details of predictor implementation are essential for authors to understand. Similarly, these guidelines for the use of predictors provide instructions on what needs to be delineated in the text, as well as how researchers can avoid unwarranted conclusions. They are applicable to most prediction methods currently utilized. By applying these guidelines, authors will help reviewers, editors, and readers to more fully comprehend prediction methods and their use.
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23169447     DOI: 10.1002/humu.22253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mutat        ISSN: 1059-7794            Impact factor:   4.878


  29 in total

1.  ClinPred: Prediction Tool to Identify Disease-Relevant Nonsynonymous Single-Nucleotide Variants.

Authors:  Najmeh Alirezaie; Kristin D Kernohan; Taila Hartley; Jacek Majewski; Toby Dylan Hocking
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Proper reporting of predictor performance.

Authors:  Mauno Vihinen
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  BRCA1- and BRCA2-specific in silico tools for variant interpretation in the CAGI 5 ENIGMA challenge.

Authors:  Natàlia Padilla; Alejandro Moles-Fernández; Casandra Riera; Gemma Montalban; Selen Özkan; Lars Ootes; Sandra Bonache; Orland Díez; Sara Gutiérrez-Enríquez; Xavier de la Cruz
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 4.878

4.  On human disease-causing amino acid variants: statistical study of sequence and structural patterns.

Authors:  Marharyta Petukh; Tugba G Kucukkal; Emil Alexov
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 4.878

5.  Blind prediction of deleterious amino acid variations with SNPs&GO.

Authors:  Emidio Capriotti; Pier Luigi Martelli; Piero Fariselli; Rita Casadio
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 4.878

6.  PON-P and PON-P2 predictor performance in CAGI challenges: Lessons learned.

Authors:  Abhishek Niroula; Mauno Vihinen
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 7.  Towards precision medicine: advances in computational approaches for the analysis of human variants.

Authors:  Thomas A Peterson; Emily Doughty; Maricel G Kann
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  PON-mt-tRNA: a multifactorial probability-based method for classification of mitochondrial tRNA variations.

Authors:  Abhishek Niroula; Mauno Vihinen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  The evaluation of tools used to predict the impact of missense variants is hindered by two types of circularity.

Authors:  Dominik G Grimm; Chloé-Agathe Azencott; Fabian Aicheler; Udo Gieraths; Daniel G MacArthur; Kaitlin E Samocha; David N Cooper; Peter D Stenson; Mark J Daly; Jordan W Smoller; Laramie E Duncan; Karsten M Borgwardt
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 4.878

10.  Ranking non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms based on disease concepts.

Authors:  Hashem A Shihab; Julian Gough; Matthew Mort; David N Cooper; Ian N M Day; Tom R Gaunt
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 4.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.