Literature DB >> 31112341

BRCA1- and BRCA2-specific in silico tools for variant interpretation in the CAGI 5 ENIGMA challenge.

Natàlia Padilla1, Alejandro Moles-Fernández2, Casandra Riera1, Gemma Montalban2, Selen Özkan1, Lars Ootes1, Sandra Bonache2, Orland Díez2,3, Sara Gutiérrez-Enríquez2, Xavier de la Cruz1,4.   

Abstract

BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) germline variants disrupting the DNA protective role of these genes increase the risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. Correct identification of these variants then becomes clinically relevant, because it may increase the survival rates of the carriers. Unfortunately, we are still unable to systematically predict the impact of BRCA1/2 variants. In this article, we present a family of in silico predictors that address this problem, using a gene-specific approach. For each protein, we have developed two tools, aimed at predicting the impact of a variant at two different levels: Functional and clinical. Testing their performance in different datasets shows that specific information compensates the small number of predictive features and the reduced training sets employed to develop our models. When applied to the variants of the BRCA1/2 (ENIGMA) challenge in the fifth Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation (CAGI 5) we find that these methods, particularly those predicting the functional impact of variants, have a good performance, identifying the large compositional bias towards neutral variants in the CAGI sample. This performance is further improved when incorporating to our prediction protocol estimates of the impact on splicing of the target variant.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioinformatics; breast cancer; functional assays; gene-specific predictor; homology-directed DNA repair (HDR); molecular diagnosis; ovarian cancer; pathogenicity predictions; protein-specific predictor; splicing predictions

Year:  2019        PMID: 31112341      PMCID: PMC6744361          DOI: 10.1002/humu.23802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mutat        ISSN: 1059-7794            Impact factor:   4.878


  48 in total

1.  Characterization of disease-associated single amino acid polymorphisms in terms of sequence and structure properties.

Authors:  Carles Ferrer-Costa; Modesto Orozco; Xavier de la Cruz
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-01-25       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Loss of protein structure stability as a major causative factor in monogenic disease.

Authors:  Peng Yue; Zhaolong Li; John Moult
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm.

Authors:  Prateek Kumar; Steven Henikoff; Pauline C Ng
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  Prevention and screening in BRCA mutation carriers and other breast/ovarian hereditary cancer syndromes: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for cancer prevention and screening.

Authors:  S Paluch-Shimon; F Cardoso; C Sessa; J Balmana; M J Cardoso; F Gilbert; E Senkus
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Reports from CAGI: The Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation.

Authors:  Roger A Hoskins; Susanna Repo; Daniel Barsky; Gaia Andreoletti; John Moult; Steven E Brenner
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 7.  BRCA1 and BRCA2: different roles in a common pathway of genome protection.

Authors:  Rohini Roy; Jarin Chun; Simon N Powell
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  ENIGMA--evidence-based network for the interpretation of germline mutant alleles: an international initiative to evaluate risk and clinical significance associated with sequence variation in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.

Authors:  Amanda B Spurdle; Sue Healey; Andrew Devereau; Frans B L Hogervorst; Alvaro N A Monteiro; Katherine L Nathanson; Paolo Radice; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Sean Tavtigian; Barbara Wappenschmidt; Fergus J Couch; David E Goldgar
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.878

9.  A classification model for BRCA2 DNA binding domain missense variants based on homology-directed repair activity.

Authors:  Lucia Guidugli; Vernon S Pankratz; Namit Singh; James Thompson; Catherine A Erding; Christoph Engel; Rita Schmutzler; Susan Domchek; Katherine Nathanson; Paolo Radice; Christian Singer; Patricia N Tonin; Noralane M Lindor; David E Goldgar; Fergus J Couch
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  PMut: a web-based tool for the annotation of pathological variants on proteins, 2017 update.

Authors:  Víctor López-Ferrando; Andrea Gazzo; Xavier de la Cruz; Modesto Orozco; Josep Ll Gelpí
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  2 in total

1.  Assessment of blind predictions of the clinical significance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants.

Authors:  Melissa S Cline; Giulia Babbi; Sandra Bonache; Yue Cao; Rita Casadio; Xavier de la Cruz; Orland Díez; Sara Gutiérrez-Enríquez; Panagiotis Katsonis; Carmen Lai; Olivier Lichtarge; Pier L Martelli; Gilad Mishne; Alejandro Moles-Fernández; Gemma Montalban; Sean D Mooney; Robert O'Conner; Lars Ootes; Selen Özkan; Natalia Padilla; Kymberleigh A Pagel; Vikas Pejaver; Predrag Radivojac; Casandra Riera; Castrense Savojardo; Yang Shen; Yuanfei Sun; Scott Topper; Michael T Parsons; Amanda B Spurdle; David E Goldgar
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 4.878

2.  Understanding and predicting the functional consequences of missense mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Authors:  Raghad Aljarf; Mengyuan Shen; Douglas E V Pires; David B Ascher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.