| Literature DB >> 23166846 |
Nicole L Gottdenker1, Luis Fernando Chaves, José E Calzada, Azael Saldaña, C Ronald Carroll.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anthropogenic land use may influence transmission of multi-host vector-borne pathogens by changing diversity, relative abundance, and community composition of reservoir hosts. These reservoir hosts may have varying competence for vector-borne pathogens depending on species-specific characteristics, such as life history strategy. The objective of this study is to evaluate how anthropogenic land use change influences blood meal species composition and the effects of changing blood meal species composition on the parasite infection rate of the Chagas disease vector Rhodnius pallescens in Panama. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23166846 PMCID: PMC3499412 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001884
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Figure 1Proportion of R. pallescens vectors infected with T. cruzi in each habitat type: Contig-contiguous forest, ES-early secondary forest, MS-mid secondary forest remnant, PD-peridomestic.**
Significantly higher proportion of infected vectors p<.01 compared to vector infection rate in contiguous forests (Generalized linear mixed model: T. cruzi positive Habitat type (fixed)+ Site (random), quasibinomial errors, link = logit).
Class and order of blood meals identified in R. pallescens.
| Class | Order | No. Blood Meals | % of Total | No. |
| Mammalia | Xenarthra | 105 | 40.5 | 61 (1NA) |
| Primata | 33 | 12.7 | 25 | |
| Marsupialia | 32 | 12.4 | 29 (1NA) | |
| Artiodactyla | 22 | 8.5 | 21 | |
| Carnivora | 16 | 6.2 | 8 (2NA) | |
| Rodentia | 11 | 4.2 | 8 (2NA) | |
| Chiroptera | 10 | 3.9 | 5 | |
| Aves | Galliformes | 11 | 4.2 | 10 |
| Passeriformes | 3 | 1.2 | 3 | |
| Unidentified | 2 | 0.8 | 2 | |
| Ciconiiformes | 1 | 0.4 | 1 | |
| Falconiformes | 1 | 0.4 | 0 | |
| Reptilia | Squamata | 8 | 3.1 | 4 (1NA) |
| Amphibia | Caudata | 4 | 1.5 | 0 (1NA) |
| Total | 259 |
NA = trypanosomes not tested.
Blood meal species identified in R. pallescens.
| Class | Order | Species | No. of blood meals | % of total |
|
| Amphibia | Caudata |
| 4 | 1.54 | 0 (1NA) |
| Aves | Aves unknown1 |
| 1 | 0.39 | 1 |
| Aves | Aves unknown2 |
| 1 | 0.39 | 1 |
| Aves | Ciconiiformes |
| 1 | 0.39 | 1 |
| Aves | Falconiformes |
| 1 | 0.39 | 0 |
| Aves | Galliformes |
| 4 | 1.54 | 3 |
| Aves | Galliformes |
| 3 | 1.16 | 3 |
| Aves | Galliformes |
| 3 | 1.16 | 3 |
| Aves | Galliformes |
| 1 | 0.39 | 1 |
| Aves | Passeriformes |
| 1 | 0.39 | 1 |
| Aves | Passeriformes |
| 1 | 0.39 | 1 |
| Aves | Passeriformes |
| 1 | 0.39 | 1 |
| Mammal | Artiodactyla |
| 18 | 6.95 | 17 |
| Mammal | Artiodactyla |
| 4 | 1.54 | 4 |
| Mammal | Carnivora |
| 8 | 3.09 | 4 (1NA) |
| Mammal | Carnivora |
| 1 | 0.39 | 1 |
| Mammal | Carnivora |
| 2 | 0.77 | 3 |
| Mammal | Carnivora |
| 5 | 1.93 | 3 |
| Mammal | Chiroptera |
| 1 | 0.39 | 0 |
| Mammal | Chiroptera |
| 1 | 0.39 | 0 |
| Mammal | Chiroptera |
| 1 | 0.39 | 0 |
| Mammal | Chiroptera |
| 2 | 0.77 | 2 |
| Mammal | Chiroptera |
| 1 | 0.39 | 0 |
| Mammal | Chiroptera |
| 2 | 0.77 | 1 |
| Mammal | Chiroptera |
| 1 | 0.39 | 1 |
| Mammal | Chiroptera |
| 1 | 0.39 | 1 |
| Mammal | Marsupialia |
| 11 | 4.25 | 9 (1NA) |
| Mammal | Marsupialia |
| 1 | 0.39 | 1 |
| Mammal | Marsupialia |
| 17 | 6.56 | 16 |
| Mammal | Marsupialia |
| 3 | 1.16 | 3 |
| Mammal | Primata |
| 11 | 4.25 | 7 |
| Mammal | Primata |
| 22 | 8.49 | 18 |
| Mammal | Rodentia |
| 4 | 1.54 | 2 (1NA) |
| Mammal | Rodentia |
| 1 | 0.39 | 1 |
| Mammal | Rodentia |
| 3 | 1.16 | 2 (1NA) |
| Mammal | Rodentia |
| 3 | 1.16 | 3 |
| Mammal | Xenarthra |
| 82 | 31.66 | 49 (1NA) |
| Mammal | Xenarthra |
| 1 | 0.39 | 1 |
| Mammal | Xenarthra |
| 22 | 8.49 | 11 |
| Reptilia | Squamata |
| 1 | 0.39 | 1 |
| Reptilia | Squamata |
| 3 | 1.16 | 2 |
| Reptilia | Squamata |
| 4 | 1.54 | 1 (1NA) |
| TOTAL | 259 | 100.00 |
Proportion of blood meals by order in each habitat type.
| Order | Contiguous forest (N = 61) | Early secondary fragment (N = 57) | Mid secondary remnant (N = 48) | Pasture (N = 43) | Peridomicilary (N = 50) |
| MAMMALIA | |||||
| Ariodactyla (N = 22) | . | 14% (3.2%) | 12.5% (2.3%) | 7.0% (1.2%) | 10.0% (2.0%) |
| Carnivora (N = 16) | 9.8% (2.3%) | 5.3% (1.2%) | 4.2% (0.8%) | 7.0% (1.2%) | 4.0% (0.8%) |
| Chiroptera (N = 10) | . | 1.8% (0.4%) | 4.2% (0.8%) | . | 14.0% (2.8%) |
| Marsupialia (N = 32) | 4.9% (1.2%) | 7% (1.6%) | 10.4% (1.9%) |
|
|
| Primata (N = 33) |
| 10.5% (2.4%) | 4.2% (0.8%) | 7.0% (1.2%) | 10.0% (2.0%) |
| Rodentia (N = 11) | 1.6% (.4%) | 7% (1.6%) | 8.3%(1.5%) | 4.7% (0.8%) | . |
| Xenarthra (N = 105) |
|
|
|
|
|
| AVES | |||||
| Ciconiiformes (N = 1) | . | 1.8% (0.4%) | . | . | . |
| Falconiformes (N = 1) | . | . | . | 2.3% (0.4%) | |
| Galliformes (N = 11) | . | 1.8% (0.4%) | 6.3% (1.2%) | 9.3% (1.5%) | 6.0% (1.2%) |
| Passeriformes (N = 3) | . 1.8% (0.4%) | 2.1% (0.4%) | . | 2.0% (0.4%) | |
| Unknown Avian 1 (N = 1) | . | . | 2.1% (0.4%) | . | . |
| Unknown Avian 2 (N = 1) | . | 1.8% (0.4%) | . | . | . |
| REPTILIA | |||||
| Squamata (N = 8) | 1.6%(.4) | 1.8% (0.4%) | . | 4.7% (0.8%) | 8.0% (1.6%) |
| AMPHIBIA | |||||
| Caudata (N = 4) | . | 3.5% (0.8%) | . | . | 4.0% (0.8%) |
In parentheses is the proportion of total blood meals consumed.
Figure 2Regression tree analysis of Trypanosoma cruzi vector infection per site.
Non-terminal nodes are surrounded by ovals and terminal nodes are surrounded by rectangles. Explanatory variables are Habitat type (type = Contig; Contiguous forest, Past; Cattle Pasture, ES; Early secondary forest fragment, MS; Mid-secondary forest remnant ,PD; peridomiciliary). Species diversity is the Shannon-Weiner index. Mean is mean r, the maximum intrinsic rate of population increase, and kurtosis and standard deviation (sd) of the r values per site are also shown. Each of four splits (nonterminal nodes) is labeled with the variable and values that determined the split. The number of sites that corresponded to each node is shown at the node. The predicted vector infection prevalence for a site is shown at each of the six terminal nodes.
Predicted effects of Tamandua, Opossum, and Primate blood meal availability on Trypanosoma cruzi infected vectors (general linear model, quasibinomial errors).
| Blood meal species | Estimate | (SE) | z value | P |
| (Intercept) | 0.832 | 0.286 | 2.90 | 0.007 ** |
| opossum | ||||
| ( | 2.708 | 1.229 | 2.20 | 0.036* |
| primate | ||||
| ( | 0.357 | 1.079 | 0.33 | 0.743 |
| tamandua | ||||
| ( | −1.088 | 1.017 | −1.07 | 0.294 |
Significance codes : 0.001** 0.01 * 0.05 . 0.1 , 1.
Availability interpreted as proportion of blood meals identified by the above species at each site.