Literature DB >> 23166047

Technical review of the da Vinci surgical telemanipulator.

C Freschi1, V Ferrari, F Melfi, M Ferrari, F Mosca, A Cuschieri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The da Vinci robotic surgical telemanipulator has been utilized in several surgical specialties for varied procedures, and the users' experiences have been widely published. To date, no detailed system technical analyses have been performed.
METHODS: A detailed review was performed of all publications and patents about the technical aspects of the da Vinci robotic system.
RESULTS: Published technical literature on the da Vinci system highlight strengths and weaknesses of the robot design. While the system facilitates complex surgical operations and has a low malfunction rate, the lack of haptic (especially tactile) feedback and collisions between the robotic arms remain the major limitations of the system. Accurate, preplanned positioning of access ports is essential.
CONCLUSION: Knowledge of the technical aspects of the da Vinci robot is important for optimal use. We confirmed the excellent system functionality and ease of use for surgeons without an engineering background. Research and development of the surgical robot has been predominant in the literature. Future trends address robot miniaturization and intelligent control design.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords:  da Vinci; laparoscopy; surgical robotics

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23166047     DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Robot        ISSN: 1478-5951            Impact factor:   2.547


  17 in total

Review 1.  [Standardized access options for colorectal surgery with the da Vinci Xi system].

Authors:  D Perez; A Woestemeier; T Ghadban; H Stein; M Gomez-Ruiz; J R Izbicki; B Soh Min
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  The first clinical use of domestically produced Chinese minimally invasive surgical robot system "Micro Hand S".

Authors:  Bo Yi; Guohui Wang; Jianmin Li; Juan Jiang; Zhi Son; Han Su; Shaihong Zhu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparing a Mechanical Analogue With the Da Vinci User Interface: Suturing at Challenging Angles.

Authors:  Patrick L Anderson; Ray A Lathrop; S Duke Herrell; Robert J Webster
Journal:  IEEE Robot Autom Lett       Date:  2016-02-11

4.  Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer in a single surgeon's experience: a cost analysis covering the initial 50 robotic cases with the da Vinci Si.

Authors:  Luca Morelli; Simone Guadagni; Valentina Lorenzoni; Gregorio Di Franco; Luigi Cobuccio; Matteo Palmeri; Giovanni Caprili; Cristiano D'Isidoro; Andrea Moglia; Vincenzo Ferrari; Giulio Di Candio; Franco Mosca; Giuseppe Turchetti
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-07-31       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Evaluation of contactless human-machine interface for robotic surgical training.

Authors:  Fabien Despinoy; Nabil Zemiti; Germain Forestier; Alonso Sánchez; Pierre Jannin; Philippe Poignet
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 6.  Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Farshid Amirabdollahian; Salvatore Livatino; Behrad Vahedi; Radhika Gudipati; Patrick Sheen; Shan Gawrie-Mohan; Nikhil Vasdev
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-12-01

7.  Domestically produced Chinese minimally invasive surgical robot system "Micro Hand S" is applied to clinical surgery preliminarily in China.

Authors:  Bo Yi; Guohui Wang; Jianmin Li; Juan Jiang; Zhi Son; Han Su; Shaihong Zhu; Shuxin Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Robot-like dexterity without computers and motors: a review of hand-held laparoscopic instruments with wrist-like tip articulation.

Authors:  Patrick L Anderson; Ray A Lathrop; Robert J Webster
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.166

Review 9.  Muscle activation during traditional laparoscopic surgery compared with robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jaime Hislop; Oren Tirosh; John McCormick; Romesh Nagarajah; Chris Hensman; Mats Isaksson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  How does a surgeon's brain buzz? An EEG coherence study on the interaction between humans and robot.

Authors:  Tommaso Bocci; Carlo Moretto; Silvia Tognazzi; Lucia Briscese; Megi Naraci; Letizia Leocani; Franco Mosca; Mauro Ferrari; Ferdinando Sartucci
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 3.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.