Literature DB >> 30090854

Comparing a Mechanical Analogue With the Da Vinci User Interface: Suturing at Challenging Angles.

Patrick L Anderson1, Ray A Lathrop1, S Duke Herrell2, Robert J Webster1.   

Abstract

The da Vinci Surgical System offers a natural user interface and wrist articulation, which enable suturing and other complex surgical actions in confined spaces. However, both the one-time cost of the system and the recurring cost of the limited-use instruments remain high. This has motivated the development of several hand-held alternatives-some partially motorized, some fully mechanical-in recent years. While a few of these have been commercialized, none have yet met with broad commercial success comparable to the da Vinci robot. In this letter, we suggest a user interface-based explanation for this, and describe a new mechanical instrument that provides wrist articulation with a novel user interface. We provide results of a single-user pilot study with an experienced laparoscopic surgeon to compare the new device with a traditional wristless laparoscopic tool, a prior commercial wristed mechanical tool (the RealHand), and the da Vinci robot, in the context of suturing at challenging angles. We observe better targeting of desired suture needle entry and exit points with the new device in comparison to prior wristed and wristless mechanical instruments, with the da Vinci only slightly outperforming the new tool.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medical Robots and Systems; Surgical Robotics: Laparoscopy

Year:  2016        PMID: 30090854      PMCID: PMC6078394          DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2016.2528302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Robot Autom Lett


  13 in total

1.  Retroperitoneoscopic and laparoscopic suturing: tips and strategies for improving efficiency.

Authors:  T Frede; C Stock; J J Rassweiler; P Alken
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 2.  Robotic surgery: a current perspective.

Authors:  Anthony R Lanfranco; Andres E Castellanos; Jaydev P Desai; William C Meyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M M Reza; J A Blasco; E Andradas; R Cantero; J Mayol
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  The radius surgical system - a new device for complex minimally invasive procedures in urology?

Authors:  Thomas Frede; Ahmed Hammady; Jan Klein; Dogu Teber; Noriyuki Inaki; Masahiro Waseda; Gerhard Buess; Jens Rassweiler
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Radius surgical system and conventional laparoscopic instruments in abdominal surgery: application, learning curve and ergonomy.

Authors:  N Di Lorenzo; I Camperchioli; A L Gaspari
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 3.279

6.  Precision in stitches: Radius Surgical System.

Authors:  M Waseda; N Inaki; J R Torres Bermudez; G Manukyan; I A Gacek; M O Schurr; M Braun; G F Buess
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in adults and children: tools and techniques.

Authors:  Todd A Ponsky
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database.

Authors:  Ulrich Guller; Sheleika Hervey; Harriett Purves; Lawrence H Muhlbaier; Eric D Peterson; Steve Eubanks; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Technique of transanal endoscopic microsurgery.

Authors:  G Buess; K Kipfmüller; D Hack; R Grüssner; A Heintz; T Junginger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  6 in total

1.  A Hand-Held Non-Robotic Surgical Tool With a Wrist and an Elbow.

Authors:  Katherine E Riojas; Patrick L Anderson; Ray A Lathrop; S Duke Herrell; D Caleb Rucker; Robert J Webster Iii
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Design, Analysis and Experimental Validation of a Novel 7-Degrees of Freedom Instrument for Laparoscopic Surgeries.

Authors:  Prabhat Kumar; Sagar Talele; Suresh Deshpande; Rupesh Ghyar; Sritam Rout; Bhallamudi Ravi
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  Comparison of Laparoscopic Steerable Instruments Performed by Expert Surgeons and Novices.

Authors:  Luca Lacitignola; Rodrigo Trisciuzzi; Annarita Imperante; Laura Fracassi; Alberto Maria Crovace; Francesco Staffieri
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2020-09-15

4.  Assessment of an Articulating Laparoscopic Needle Holder (FlexDex™) Compared to a Conventional Rigid Needle Holder in 2-Dimension Vision Amongst Novices: A Randomised Controlled Study.

Authors:  Nima Motahariasl; Sayed Borna Farzaneh; Sina Motahariasl; Ilya Kokotkin; Sara Sousi; Alexander Zargaran; David Zargaran; Bijendra Patel
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2022-02-04

5.  Endoscopic surgery suturing techniques: a randomized study on learning.

Authors:  F J Voskens; E M van der Schans; J P Ruurda; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  A Fully 3D-Printed Steerable Instrument for Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Authors:  Costanza Culmone; Kirsten Lussenburg; Joost Alkemade; Gerwin Smit; Aimée Sakes; Paul Breedveld
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.623

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.