BACKGROUND: Irradiation of intraocular tumors requires dedicated techniques, such as brachytherapy with (106)Ru plaques. The currently available treatment planning system relies on the assumption that the eye is a homogeneous water sphere and on simplified radiation transport physics. However, accurate dose distributions and their assessment demand better models for both the eye and the physics. METHODS: The Monte Carlo code PENELOPE, conveniently adapted to simulate the beta decay of (106)Ru over (106)Rh into (106)Pd, was used to simulate radiation transport based on a computerized tomography scan of a patient's eye. A detailed geometrical description of two plaques (models CCA and CCB) from the manufacturer BEBIG was embedded in the computerized tomography scan. RESULTS: The simulations were firstly validated by comparison with experimental results in a water phantom. Dose maps were computed for three plaque locations on the eyeball. From these maps, isodose curves and cumulative dose-volume histograms in the eye and for the structures at risk were assessed. For example, it was observed that a 4-mm anterior displacement with respect to a posterior placement of a CCA plaque for treating a posterior tumor would reduce from 40 to 0% the volume of the optic disc receiving more than 80 Gy. Such a small difference in anatomical position leads to a change in the dose that is crucial for side effects, especially with respect to visual acuity. The radiation oncologist has to bring these large changes in absorbed dose in the structures at risk to the attention of the surgeon, especially when the plaque has to be positioned close to relevant tissues. CONCLUSION: The detailed geometry of an eye plaque in computerized and segmented tomography of a realistic patient phantom was simulated accurately. Dose-volume histograms for relevant anatomical structures of the eye and the orbit were obtained with unprecedented accuracy. This represents an important step toward an optimized brachytherapy treatment of ocular tumors.
BACKGROUND: Irradiation of intraocular tumors requires dedicated techniques, such as brachytherapy with (106)Ru plaques. The currently available treatment planning system relies on the assumption that the eye is a homogeneous water sphere and on simplified radiation transport physics. However, accurate dose distributions and their assessment demand better models for both the eye and the physics. METHODS: The Monte Carlo code PENELOPE, conveniently adapted to simulate the beta decay of (106)Ru over (106)Rh into (106)Pd, was used to simulate radiation transport based on a computerized tomography scan of a patient's eye. A detailed geometrical description of two plaques (models CCA and CCB) from the manufacturer BEBIG was embedded in the computerized tomography scan. RESULTS: The simulations were firstly validated by comparison with experimental results in a water phantom. Dose maps were computed for three plaque locations on the eyeball. From these maps, isodose curves and cumulative dose-volume histograms in the eye and for the structures at risk were assessed. For example, it was observed that a 4-mm anterior displacement with respect to a posterior placement of a CCA plaque for treating a posterior tumor would reduce from 40 to 0% the volume of the optic disc receiving more than 80 Gy. Such a small difference in anatomical position leads to a change in the dose that is crucial for side effects, especially with respect to visual acuity. The radiation oncologist has to bring these large changes in absorbed dose in the structures at risk to the attention of the surgeon, especially when the plaque has to be positioned close to relevant tissues. CONCLUSION: The detailed geometry of an eye plaque in computerized and segmented tomography of a realistic patient phantom was simulated accurately. Dose-volume histograms for relevant anatomical structures of the eye and the orbit were obtained with unprecedented accuracy. This represents an important step toward an optimized brachytherapy treatment of ocular tumors.
Authors: Indrin J Chetty; Bruce Curran; Joanna E Cygler; John J DeMarco; Gary Ezzell; Bruce A Faddegon; Iwan Kawrakow; Paul J Keall; Helen Liu; C M Charlie Ma; D W O Rogers; Jan Seuntjens; Daryoush Sheikh-Bagheri; Jeffrey V Siebers Journal: Med Phys Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Erik Stöckel; Marion Eichmann; Dirk Flühs; Holger Sommer; Eva Biewald; Norbert Bornfeld; Bernhard Spaan; Wolfgang Sauerwein Journal: Ocul Oncol Pathol Date: 2017-09-16
Authors: M Krengli; L Masini; A M Comoli; E Negri; L Deantonio; A Filomeno; G Gambaro Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Francisco J Zaragoza; Marion Eichmann; Dirk Flühs; Andrea Wittig; Wolfgang Sauerwein; Lorenzo Brualla Journal: Ocul Oncol Pathol Date: 2018-10-15
Authors: Somayeh Asadi; Mehdi Vaez-zadeh; S Farhad Masoudi; Faezeh Rahmani; Courtney Knaup; Ali S Meigooni Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2015-09-08 Impact factor: 2.102