Literature DB >> 23160149

Randomized clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation versus conventional surgery for small saphenous varicose veins.

Nehemiah Samuel1, Daniel Carradice, Tom Wallace, Anthony Mekako, Josie Hatfield, Ian Chetter.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: No randomized clinical trial comparing treatment options for small saphenous vein (SSV) incompetence exists, and there is no clear evidence that this axis behaves the same as the great saphenous vein after treatment. This means that the existing literature base, centered on the treatment of great saphenous vein incompetence cannot simply be extrapolated to inform the management of SSV insufficiency. This trial compares the gold standard of conventional surgery and endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) in the management of SSV incompetence.
METHODS: Patients with unilateral, primary saphenopopliteal junction incompetence and SSV reflux were randomized equally into parallel groups receiving either surgery or EVLA. Patients were assessed at baseline and weeks 1, 6, 12, and 52. Outcomes included successful abolition of axial reflux on duplex, visual analog pain scores, recovery time, complication rates, Venous Clinical Severity Score, and quality of life profiling.
RESULTS: A total of 106 patients were recruited and randomized to surgery (n = 53) or EVLA (n = 53). Abolition of SSV reflux was significantly higher after EVLA (96.2%) than surgery (71.7%) (P < 0.001). Postoperative pain was significantly lower after EVLA (P < 0.05), allowing an earlier return to work and normal function (P < 0.001). Minor sensory disturbance was significantly lower in the EVLA group (7.5%) than in surgery (26.4%) (P = 0.009). Both groups demonstrated similar improvements in Venous Clinical Severity Score and quality of life.
CONCLUSION: EVLA produced the same clinical benefits as conventional surgery but was more effective in addressing the underlying pathophysiology and was associated with less periprocedural morbidity allowing a faster recovery. ( REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00841178.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23160149     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318275f4e4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  9 in total

1.  Utility of the Ginza forceps for superficial phlebectomy during endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein.

Authors:  Takeshi Baba; Takao Ohki; Yuji Kanaoka; Koji Maeda; Kenjirou Kaneko; Masayuki Hara; Kota Shukuzawa; Soichiro Fukushima
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Endovenous ablation therapy (laser or radiofrequency) or foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgical repair for short saphenous varicose veins.

Authors:  Sharath Chandra Vikram Paravastu; Margaret Horne; P Dominic F Dodd
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-29

Review 3.  S2k guidelines: diagnosis and treatment of varicose veins.

Authors:  F Pannier; T Noppeney; J Alm; F X Breu; G Bruning; I Flessenkämper; H Gerlach; K Hartmann; B Kahle; H Kluess; E Mendoza; D Mühlberger; A Mumme; H Nüllen; K Rass; S Reich-Schupke; D Stenger; M Stücker; C G Schmedt; T Schwarz; J Tesmann; J Teßarek; S Werth; E Valesky
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 1.198

4.  Mechanochemical endovenous ablation versus radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of primary small saphenous vein insufficiency (MESSI trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Doeke Boersma; Ramon R J P van Eekeren; Hans J C Kelder; Debora A B Werson; Suzanne Holewijn; Michiel A Schreve; Michel M P J Reijnen; Jean Paul P M de Vries
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Endovenous laser ablation versus mechanochemical ablation with ClariVein(®) in the management of superficial venous insufficiency (LAMA trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Clement C M Leung; Daniel Carradice; Tom Wallace; Ian C Chetter
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Mid-calf level as a puncture site is not safe enough for thermal ablation of the small saphenous vein.

Authors:  Soner Sanioglu; Halit Yerebakan; Ali Ozgen; Huseyin O Ozdemir; Nurcan K Sancar; Mustafa B Farsak
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2017-09-12

7.  Evaluation of endolaser thermoablation of the small saphenous vein under local anesthesia.

Authors:  Filipe Cézar Bertassoni de Souza; Walter Jr Boim de Araujo; Adriana Buechner de Freitas Brandao; Camila de Almeida Mazzoni; Fabiano Luiz Erzinger; Filipe Carlos Caron; Viviane Gomes Milgioransa Ruggeri
Journal:  J Vasc Bras       Date:  2021-08-02

8.  Behavioural recovery after treatment for varicose veins.

Authors:  S C Cotton; G MacLennan; J Brittenden; M Prior; J Francis
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Midterm Clinical Outcomes after Modified High Ligation and Segmental Stripping of Incompetent Small Saphenous Veins.

Authors:  Ki Pyo Hong
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-12-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.