PURPOSE: To assess the association between clear-cell carcinoma pathology grade at nephrectomy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tumor enhancement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective study and waived the informed consent requirement. In all, 32 patients underwent multiphase contrast-enhanced MRI prior to nephrectomy. MRI tumor enhancement was measured using two approaches: 1) the most enhancing portion of the tumor on a single slice and 2) volumetric analysis of enhancement in the entire tumor. Associations between pathological grade, tumor size, and enhancement were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test and generalized logistic regression models. RESULTS: No significant association between pathology grade and enhancement was found when measurements were made on a single slice. When measured in the entire tumor, significant associations were found between higher pathology grades and lower mean, median, top 10%, top 25%, and top 50% tumor enhancement (P < 0.001-0.002). On multivariate analysis the association between grade and enhancement remained significant (P = 0.041-0.043), but tumor size did not make an additional contribution beyond tumor enhancement alone in differentiating between tumor grades. CONCLUSION: There is significant association between tumor grade and enhancement, but only when measured in the entire tumor and not on the most enhancing portion on a single slice.
PURPOSE: To assess the association between clear-cell carcinoma pathology grade at nephrectomy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tumor enhancement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective study and waived the informed consent requirement. In all, 32 patients underwent multiphase contrast-enhanced MRI prior to nephrectomy. MRI tumor enhancement was measured using two approaches: 1) the most enhancing portion of the tumor on a single slice and 2) volumetric analysis of enhancement in the entire tumor. Associations between pathological grade, tumor size, and enhancement were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test and generalized logistic regression models. RESULTS: No significant association between pathology grade and enhancement was found when measurements were made on a single slice. When measured in the entire tumor, significant associations were found between higher pathology grades and lower mean, median, top 10%, top 25%, and top 50% tumor enhancement (P < 0.001-0.002). On multivariate analysis the association between grade and enhancement remained significant (P = 0.041-0.043), but tumor size did not make an additional contribution beyond tumor enhancement alone in differentiating between tumor grades. CONCLUSION: There is significant association between tumor grade and enhancement, but only when measured in the entire tumor and not on the most enhancing portion on a single slice.
Authors: Maximiliano Sorbellini; Michael W Kattan; Mark E Snyder; Victor Reuter; Robert Motzer; Manlio Goetzl; James McKiernan; Paul Russo Journal: J Urol Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Michael J Leveridge; Antonio Finelli; John R Kachura; Andrew Evans; Hannah Chung; Daniel A Shiff; Kimberly Fernandes; Michael A S Jewett Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-06-24 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Amnon Zisman; Allan J Pantuck; Jeffery Wieder; Debby H Chao; Fredrick Dorey; Jonathan W Said; Jean B deKernion; Robert A Figlin; Arie S Belldegrun Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: L Cindolo; A de la Taille; G Messina; L Romis; C C Abbou; V Altieri; A Rodriguez; J J Patard Journal: BJU Int Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Andreas M Hötker; Yousef Mazaheri; Andreas Wibmer; Christoph A Karlo; Junting Zheng; Chaya S Moskowitz; Satish K Tickoo; Paul Russo; Hedvig Hricak; Oguz Akin Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2017-01-17 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: F Cornelis; E Tricaud; A S Lasserre; F Petitpierre; J C Bernhard; Y Le Bras; M Yacoub; M Bouzgarrou; A Ravaud; N Grenier Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-08-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: F Cornelis; E Tricaud; A S Lasserre; F Petitpierre; J C Bernhard; Y Le Bras; M Yacoub; M Bouzgarrou; A Ravaud; N Grenier Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-02-21 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: J J Wendler; B Friebe; D Baumunk; A Blana; T Franiel; R Ganzer; B Hadaschik; T Henkel; K U Köhrmann; J Köllermann; T Kuru; S Machtens; A Roosen; G Salomon; H P Schlemmer; L Sentker; U Witzsch; U B Liehr; J Ricke; M Schostak Journal: Urologe A Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 0.639
Authors: Kousei Ishigami; Leandro V Leite; Marius G Pakalniskis; Daniel K Lee; Danniele G Holanda; David M Kuehn Journal: Springerplus Date: 2014-11-26