Literature DB >> 24690616

MRI phenotype in renal cancer: is it clinically relevant?

Naomi Campbell1, Andrew B Rosenkrantz, Ivan Pedrosa.   

Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is most commonly diagnosed as an incidental finding on cross-sectional imaging and represents a significant clinical challenge. Although most patients have a surgically curable lesion at the time of diagnosis, the variability in the biologic behavior of the different histologic subtypes and tumor grade of RCC, together with the increasing array of management options, creates uncertainty for the optimal clinical approach to individual patients. State-of-the-art magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides a comprehensive assessment of renal lesions that includes multiple forms of tissue contrast as well as functional parameters, which in turn provides information that helps to address this dilemma. In this article, we review this evolving and increasingly comprehensive role of MRI in the detection, characterization, perioperative evaluation, and assessment of the treatment response of renal neoplasms. We emphasize the ability of the imaging "phenotype" of renal masses on MRI to help predict the histologic subtype, grade, and clinical behavior of RCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24690616      PMCID: PMC4484274          DOI: 10.1097/RMR.0000000000000019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0899-3459


  159 in total

1.  Comparison of biexponential and monoexponential model of diffusion weighted imaging in evaluation of renal lesions: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Hersh Chandarana; Vivian S Lee; Elizabeth Hecht; Bachir Taouli; Eric E Sigmund
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 2.  Renal-cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Herbert T Cohen; Francis J McGovern
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma: comparison of imaging and pathologic findings.

Authors:  Nicole M Hindman; Morton A Bosniak; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Stephanie Lee-Felker; Jonathan Melamed
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reassess treatment effect.

Authors:  John M Hollingsworth; David C Miller; Stephanie Daignault; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  MRI assessment of early tumor response in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with sorafenib.

Authors:  Hyunseon Christine Kang; Kay-See Tan; Stephen M Keefe; Daniel F Heitjan; Evan S Siegelman; Keith T Flaherty; Peter J O'Dwyer; Mark A Rosen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Prognostic implications of the magnetic resonance imaging appearance in papillary renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Aarti Sekhar; Elizabeth M Genega; Jonathan Melamed; James S Babb; Amish D Patel; Andy Lo; Robert M Najarian; Muneeb Ahmed; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  The loss of radiographic enhancement in primary renal cell carcinoma tumors following multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase therapy is an additional indicator of response.

Authors:  C Lance Cowey; Julia R Fielding; W Kimryn Rathmell
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging-measured blood flow change after antiangiogenic therapy with PTK787/ZK 222584 correlates with clinical outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Cedric de Bazelaire; David C Alsop; Daniel George; Ivan Pedrosa; Yongyu Wang; M Dror Michaelson; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma with nonclear cell histology.

Authors:  Wassim Kassouf; Ricardo Sanchez-Ortiz; Pheroze Tamboli; Nizar Tannir; Eric Jonasch; Madhur M Merchant; Surena Matin; David A Swanson; Christopher G Wood
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Active surveillance of renal masses in elderly patients.

Authors:  Robert Abouassaly; Brian R Lane; Andrew C Novick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Renal angiomyolipoma without visible fat: Can we make the diagnosis using CT and MRI?

Authors:  Robert S Lim; Trevor A Flood; Matthew D F McInnes; Luke T Lavallee; Nicola Schieda
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  MRI evaluation of small (<4cm) solid renal masses: multivariate modeling improves diagnostic accuracy for angiomyolipoma without visible fat compared to univariate analysis.

Authors:  Nicola Schieda; Marc Dilauro; Bardia Moosavi; Taryn Hodgdon; Gregory O Cron; Matthew D F McInnes; Trevor A Flood
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Angiomyolipoma (AML) without visible fat: Ultrasound, CT and MR imaging features with pathological correlation.

Authors:  Shaheed W Hakim; Nicola Schieda; Taryn Hodgdon; Matthew D F McInnes; Marc Dilauro; Trevor A Flood
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Review of renal cell carcinoma and its common subtypes in radiology.

Authors:  Gavin Low; Guan Huang; Winnie Fu; Zaahir Moloo; Safwat Girgis
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-28

5.  Predicting common solid renal tumors using machine learning models of classification of radiologist-assessed magnetic resonance characteristics.

Authors:  Camila Lopes Vendrami; Robert J McCarthy; Carolina Parada Villavicencio; Frank H Miller
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-07-14

Review 6.  CT and MRI of small renal masses.

Authors:  Zhen J Wang; Antonio C Westphalen; Ronald J Zagoria
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  Radiomics in Kidney Cancer: MR Imaging.

Authors:  Alberto Diaz de Leon; Payal Kapur; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 8.  Correlating Preoperative Imaging with Histologic Subtypes of Renal Cell Carcinoma and Common Mimickers.

Authors:  Jennifer Gordetsky; Jessica Zarzour
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Tumor Vascularity in Renal Masses: Correlation of Arterial Spin-Labeled and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessments.

Authors:  Yue Zhang; Payal Kapur; Qing Yuan; Yin Xi; Ingrid Carvo; Sabina Signoretti; Ivan Dimitrov; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Vitaly Margulis; Naira Muradyan; James Brugarolas; Ananth J Madhuranthakam; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 2.872

10.  Comparison of biexponential and monoexponential DWI in evaluation of Fuhrman grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Lijuan Shen; Liangping Zhou; Xiaohang Liu; Xiaoqun Yang
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.630

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.