Literature DB >> 23150853

LI-RADS: a case-based review of the new categorization of liver findings in patients with end-stage liver disease.

Andrei S Purysko1, Erick M Remer, Christopher P Coppa, Hilton M Leão Filho, Chakradhar R Thupili, Joseph C Veniero.   

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a global health problem, with the burden of disease expected to increase in the coming years. Patients who are at increased risk for developing HCC undergo routine imaging surveillance, and once a focal abnormality is detected, evaluation with multiphasic contrast material-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging is necessary for diagnosis and staging. Currently, findings at liver imaging are inconsistently interpreted and reported by most radiologists. The Liver Imaging-Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is an initiative supported by the American College of Radiology that aims to reduce variability in lesion interpretation by standardizing report content and structure; improving communication with clinicians; and facilitating decision making (eg, for transplantation, ablative therapy, or chemotherapy), outcome monitoring, performance auditing, quality assurance, and research. Five categories that follow the diagnostic thought process are used to stratify individual observations according to the level of concern for HCC, with the most worrisome imaging features including a masslike configuration, arterial phase hyperenhancement, portal venous phase or later phase hypoenhancement, an increase of 10 mm or more in diameter within 1 year, and tumor within the lumen of a vein. LI-RADS continues to evolve and is expected to integrate a series of improvements in future versions that will positively affect the care of at-risk patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23150853     DOI: 10.1148/rg.327125026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  29 in total

1.  Differentiation of intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MR imaging.

Authors:  Rihyeon Kim; Jeong Min Lee; Cheong-Il Shin; Eun Sun Lee; Jeong Hee Yoon; Ijin Joo; Seong Ho Kim; Inpyeong Hwang; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Inter- and Intrareader Agreement of NI-RADS in the Interpretation of Surveillance Contrast-Enhanced CT after Treatment of Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  F H J Elsholtz; S-R Ro; S Shnayien; C Erxleben; H-C Bauknecht; J Lenk; L-A Schaafs; B Hamm; S M Niehues
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Solid liver masses: approach to management from the standpoint of a radiologist.

Authors:  Robert Garrett
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2013-12

4.  A novel reporting system to improve accuracy in appendicitis imaging.

Authors:  Benjamin D Godwin; Frederick T Drake; Vlad V Simianu; Jabi E Shriki; Daniel S Hippe; Manjiri Dighe; Sarah Bastawrous; Carlos Cuevas; David Flum; Puneet Bhargava
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Is there a need to standardize reporting terminology in appendicitis?

Authors:  Benjamin David Godwin; Vlad Valentin Simianu; Frederick Thurston Drake; Manjiri Dighe; David Flum; Puneet Bhargava
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.657

6.  Modified CAIPIRINHA-VIBE without view-sharing on gadoxetic acid-enhanced multi-arterial phase MR imaging for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with the CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE.

Authors:  Seung Baek Hong; Nam Kyung Lee; Suk Kim; Hyeong Il Seo; Hyun Sung Kim; Dong Uk Kim; Tae Un Kim; Hwa Seong Ryu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Performance of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for the diagnosis of LI-RADS 4 category hepatocellular carcinoma nodules with different diameters.

Authors:  Qi Tang; Cong Ma
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  PSMA-RADS Version 1.0: A Step Towards Standardizing the Interpretation and Reporting of PSMA-targeted PET Imaging Studies.

Authors:  Steven P Rowe; Kenneth J Pienta; Martin G Pomper; Michael A Gorin
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Intention to treat outcome of T1 hepatocellular carcinoma with the "wait and not ablate" approach until meeting T2 criteria for liver transplant listing.

Authors:  Neil Mehta; Monika Sarkar; Jennifer L Dodge; Nicholas Fidelman; John P Roberts; Francis Y Yao
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 10.  MRI of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update of current practices.

Authors:  Hina Arif-Tiwari; Bobby Kalb; Surya Chundru; Puneet Sharma; James Costello; Rainner W Guessner; Diego R Martin
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.