F H J Elsholtz1, S-R Ro2, S Shnayien2, C Erxleben2, H-C Bauknecht3, J Lenk2, L-A Schaafs2, B Hamm2, S M Niehues2. 1. From the Institute of Radiology (F.H.J.E., S.-R.R., S.S., C.E., J.L., L.-A.S., B.H., S.M.N.), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany fabian.elsholtz@charite.de. 2. From the Institute of Radiology (F.H.J.E., S.-R.R., S.S., C.E., J.L., L.-A.S., B.H., S.M.N.), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany. 3. Institute of Neuroradiology (H.-C.B.), Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System was introduced to assess the probability of recurrence in surveillance imaging after treatment of head and neck cancer. This study investigated inter- and intrareader agreement in interpreting contrast-enhanced CT after treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed CT datasets of 101 patients. Four radiologists provided the Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System reports for the primary site and neck (cervical lymph nodes). The Kendall's coefficient of concordance (W), Fleiss κ (κF), the Kendall's rank correlation coefficient (τB), and weighted κ statistics (κw) were calculated to assess inter- and intrareader agreement. RESULTS: Overall, interreader agreement was strong or moderate for both the primary site (W = 0.74, κF = 0.48) and the neck (W = 0.80, κF = 0.50), depending on the statistics applied. Interreader agreement was higher in patients with proved recurrence at the primary site (W = 0.96 versus 0.56, κF = 0.65 versus 0.30) or in the neck (W = 0.78 versus 0.56, κF = 0.41 versus 0.29). Intrareader agreement was moderate to strong or almost perfect at the primary site (range τB = 0.67-0.82, κw = 0.85-0.96) and strong or almost perfect in the neck (range τB = 0.76-0.86, κw = 0.89-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: The Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System used for surveillance contrast-enhanced CT after treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma provides acceptable score reproducibility with limitations in patients with posttherapeutic changes but no cancer recurrence.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System was introduced to assess the probability of recurrence in surveillance imaging after treatment of head and neck cancer. This study investigated inter- and intrareader agreement in interpreting contrast-enhanced CT after treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed CT datasets of 101 patients. Four radiologists provided the Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System reports for the primary site and neck (cervical lymph nodes). The Kendall's coefficient of concordance (W), Fleiss κ (κF), the Kendall's rank correlation coefficient (τB), and weighted κ statistics (κw) were calculated to assess inter- and intrareader agreement. RESULTS: Overall, interreader agreement was strong or moderate for both the primary site (W = 0.74, κF = 0.48) and the neck (W = 0.80, κF = 0.50), depending on the statistics applied. Interreader agreement was higher in patients with proved recurrence at the primary site (W = 0.96 versus 0.56, κF = 0.65 versus 0.30) or in the neck (W = 0.78 versus 0.56, κF = 0.41 versus 0.29). Intrareader agreement was moderate to strong or almost perfect at the primary site (range τB = 0.67-0.82, κw = 0.85-0.96) and strong or almost perfect in the neck (range τB = 0.76-0.86, κw = 0.89-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: The Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System used for surveillance contrast-enhanced CT after treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma provides acceptable score reproducibility with limitations in patients with posttherapeutic changes but no cancer recurrence.
Authors: Ashley H Aiken; April Farley; Kristen L Baugnon; Amanda Corey; Mark El-Deiry; Richard Duszak; Jonathan Beitler; Patricia A Hudgins Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2015-11-11 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Clayton P Smith; Stephanie A Harmon; Tristan Barrett; Leonardo K Bittencourt; Yan Mee Law; Haytham Shebel; Julie Y An; Marcin Czarniecki; Sherif Mehralivand; Mehmet Coskun; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Joanna H Shih; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2018-12-21 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Ashley H Aiken; Tanya J Rath; Yoshimi Anzai; Barton F Branstetter; Jenny K Hoang; Richard H Wiggins; Amy F Juliano; Christine Glastonbury; C Douglas Phillips; Richard Brown; Patricia A Hudgins Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2018-07-06 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: David G Pfister; Sharon Spencer; David M Brizel; Barbara Burtness; Paul M Busse; Jimmy J Caudell; Anthony J Cmelak; A Dimitrios Colevas; Frank Dunphy; David W Eisele; Jill Gilbert; Maura L Gillison; Robert I Haddad; Bruce H Haughey; Wesley L Hicks; Ying J Hitchcock; Antonio Jimeno; Merrill S Kies; William M Lydiatt; Ellie Maghami; Renato Martins; Thomas McCaffrey; Loren K Mell; Bharat B Mittal; Harlan A Pinto; John A Ridge; Cristina P Rodriguez; Sandeep Samant; David E Schuller; Jatin P Shah; Randal S Weber; Gregory T Wolf; Frank Worden; Sue S Yom; Nicole R McMillian; Miranda Hughes Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Anil K Chaturvedi; Eric A Engels; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Brenda Y Hernandez; Weihong Xiao; Esther Kim; Bo Jiang; Marc T Goodman; Maria Sibug-Saber; Wendy Cozen; Lihua Liu; Charles F Lynch; Nicolas Wentzensen; Richard C Jordan; Sean Altekruse; William F Anderson; Philip S Rosenberg; Maura L Gillison Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Andrei S Purysko; Erick M Remer; Christopher P Coppa; Hilton M Leão Filho; Chakradhar R Thupili; Joseph C Veniero Journal: Radiographics Date: 2012 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Christoph J Griessenauer; Joseph H Miller; Bonita S Agee; Winfield S Fisher; Joel K Curé; Philip R Chapman; Paul M Foreman; Wilson A M Fisher; Adam C Witcher; Beverly C Walters Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2014-03-14 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: P Wangaryattawanich; B F Branstetter; M Hughes; D A Clump; D E Heron; T J Rath Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2018-08-30 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 508.702