OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the disparity between muscle metabolic rate and mitochondrial metabolism in human muscle of sedentary vs. active individuals. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Chronic activity level was characterized by a physical activity questionnaire and a triaxial accelerometer as well as a maximal oxygen uptake test. The ATP and O(2) fluxes and mitochondrial coupling (ATP/O(2) or P/O) in resting muscle as well as mitochondrial capacity (ATP(max)) were determined in vivo in human vastus lateralis muscle using magnetic resonance and optical spectroscopy on 24 sedentary and seven active subjects. Muscle biopsies were analyzed for electron transport chain content (using complex III as a representative marker) and mitochondrial proteins associated with antioxidant protection. RESULTS: Sedentary muscle had lower electron transport chain complex content (65% of the active group) in proportion to the reduction in ATP(max) (0.69 ± 0.07 vs. 1.07 ± 0.06 mM sec(-1)) as compared with active subjects. This lower ATP(max) paired with an unchanged O(2) flux in resting muscle between groups resulted in a doubling of O(2) flux per ATP(max) (3.3 ± 0.3 vs. 1.7 ± 0.2 μM O(2) per mM ATP) that reflected mitochondrial uncoupling (P/O = 1.41 ± 0.1 vs. 2.1 ± 0.3) and greater UCP3/complex III (6.0 ± 0.7 vs. 3.8 ± 0.3) in sedentary vs. active subjects. CONCLUSION: A smaller mitochondrial pool serving the same O(2) flux resulted in elevated mitochondrial respiration in sedentary muscle. In addition, uncoupling contributed to this higher mitochondrial respiration. This finding resolves the paradox of stable muscle metabolism but greater mitochondrial respiration in muscle of inactive vs. active subjects.
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the disparity between muscle metabolic rate and mitochondrial metabolism in human muscle of sedentary vs. active individuals. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Chronic activity level was characterized by a physical activity questionnaire and a triaxial accelerometer as well as a maximal oxygen uptake test. The ATP and O(2) fluxes and mitochondrial coupling (ATP/O(2) or P/O) in resting muscle as well as mitochondrial capacity (ATP(max)) were determined in vivo in human vastus lateralis muscle using magnetic resonance and optical spectroscopy on 24 sedentary and seven active subjects. Muscle biopsies were analyzed for electron transport chain content (using complex III as a representative marker) and mitochondrial proteins associated with antioxidant protection. RESULTS: Sedentary muscle had lower electron transport chain complex content (65% of the active group) in proportion to the reduction in ATP(max) (0.69 ± 0.07 vs. 1.07 ± 0.06 mM sec(-1)) as compared with active subjects. This lower ATP(max) paired with an unchanged O(2) flux in resting muscle between groups resulted in a doubling of O(2) flux per ATP(max) (3.3 ± 0.3 vs. 1.7 ± 0.2 μM O(2) per mM ATP) that reflected mitochondrial uncoupling (P/O = 1.41 ± 0.1 vs. 2.1 ± 0.3) and greater UCP3/complex III (6.0 ± 0.7 vs. 3.8 ± 0.3) in sedentary vs. active subjects. CONCLUSION: A smaller mitochondrial pool serving the same O(2) flux resulted in elevated mitochondrial respiration in sedentary muscle. In addition, uncoupling contributed to this higher mitochondrial respiration. This finding resolves the paradox of stable muscle metabolism but greater mitochondrial respiration in muscle of inactive vs. active subjects.
Authors: Catherine E Amara; Eric G Shankland; Sharon A Jubrias; David J Marcinek; Martin J Kushmerick; Kevin E Conley Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-01-10 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: David J Marcinek; Kenneth A Schenkman; Wayne A Ciesielski; Donghoon Lee; Kevin E Conley Journal: J Physiol Date: 2005-10-27 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Matthijs K C Hesselink; Paul L Greenhaff; Dimitru Constantin-Teodosiu; Eric Hultman; Wim H M Saris; Robby Nieuwlaat; Gert Schaart; Esther Kornips; Patrick Schrauwen Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: J Zoll; H Sanchez; B N'Guessan; F Ribera; E Lampert; X Bigard; B Serrurier; D Fortin; B Geny; V Veksler; R Ventura-Clapier; B Mettauer Journal: J Physiol Date: 2002-08-15 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Michael P Siegel; Shane E Kruse; Gary Knowels; Adam Salmon; Richard Beyer; Hui Xie; Holly Van Remmen; Steven R Smith; David J Marcinek Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-11-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Bryan Kestenbaum; Jorge Gamboa; Sophia Liu; Amir S Ali; Eric Shankland; Thomas Jue; Cecilia Giulivi; Lucas R Smith; Jonathan Himmelfarb; Ian H de Boer; Kevin Conley; Baback Roshanravan Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2020-03-12
Authors: Gary R Hunter; Douglas R Moellering; Stephen J Carter; Barbara A Gower; Marcas M Bamman; Lyndsey M Hornbuckle; Eric P Plaisance; Gordon Fisher Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Darcy L Johannsen; Kara L Marlatt; Kevin E Conley; Steven R Smith; Eric Ravussin Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Lauren M Sparks; Leanne M Redman; Kevin E Conley; Mary-Ellen Harper; Fanchao Yi; Andrew Hodges; Alexey Eroshkin; Sheila R Costford; Meghan E Gabriel; Cherie Shook; Heather H Cornnell; Eric Ravussin; Steven R Smith Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2017-01-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Ashwin Akki; Huanle Yang; Ashish Gupta; Vadappuram P Chacko; Toshiyuki Yano; Michelle K Leppo; Charles Steenbergen; Jeremy Walston; Robert G Weiss Journal: Age (Dordr) Date: 2013-05-22